Derandomization of auctions

We study the problem of designing seller-optimal auctions, i.e. auctions where the objective is to maximize revenue. Prior to this work, the only auctions known to be approximately optimal in the worst case employed randomization. Our main result is the existence of deterministic auctions that approximately match the performance guarantees of these randomized auctions. We give a fairly general derandomization technique for turning any randomized mechanism into an asymmetric deterministic one with approximately the same revenue. In doing so, we bypass the impossibility result for symmetric deterministic auctions and show that asymmetry is nearly as powerful as randomization for solving optimal mechanism design problems. Our general construction involves solving an exponential-sized flow problem and thus is not polynomial-time computable. To complete the picture, we give an explicit polynomial-time construction for derandomizing a specific auction with good worst-case revenue. Our results are based on toy problems that have a flavor similar to the hat problem from [3].

[1]  Peter Winkler Games People Don � t Play , .

[2]  H. Moulin,et al.  Strategyproof sharing of submodular costs:budget balance versus efficiency , 2001 .

[3]  Jason D. Hartline,et al.  From optimal limited to unlimited supply auctions , 2005, EC '05.

[4]  William J. Cook,et al.  Combinatorial optimization , 1997 .

[5]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Competitiveness via consensus , 2003, SODA '03.

[6]  Y. Shoham,et al.  Truth revelation in rapid, approximately efficient combinatorial auctions , 2001 .

[7]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Online learning in online auctions , 2003, SODA '03.

[8]  Todd Ebert,et al.  Applications of recursive operators to randomness and complexity , 1998 .

[9]  Heribert Vollmer,et al.  On the Autoreducibility of Random Sequences , 2000, SIAM J. Comput..

[10]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions , 2002, EC '99.

[11]  M. R. Rao,et al.  Combinatorial Optimization , 1992, NATO ASI Series.

[12]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[13]  Maria-Florina Balcan,et al.  Mechanism design via machine learning , 2005, 46th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'05).

[14]  H. Moulin Incremental cost sharing: Characterization by coalition strategy-proofness , 1999 .

[15]  Avrim Blum,et al.  Near-optimal online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[16]  J. Mirrlees An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation an Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation L Y 2 , 2022 .

[17]  Andrew V. Goldberg,et al.  Competitive auctions and digital goods , 2001, SODA '01.

[18]  R. Tennant Algebra , 1941, Nature.

[19]  Amos Fiat,et al.  Competitive generalized auctions , 2002, STOC '02.

[20]  Alastair Macaulay,et al.  You can leave your hat on , 2005 .

[21]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  Computing with strategic agents , 2005 .