CT-MRI image fusion for delineation of volumes in three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

The objective of this study was to assess the utility of CT-MRI image fusion software and compare both prostate volume and localization with CT and MRI studies. We evaluated the differences in clinical volumes in patients undergoing three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. After several tests performed to ensure the quality of image fusion software, eight patients suffering from prostate adenocarcinoma were submitted to CT and MRI studies in the treatment position within an immobilization device before the start of radiotherapy. The clinical target volume (CTV) (prostate plus seminal vesicles) was delineated on CT and MRI studies and image fusion was obtained from the superimposition of anatomical fiducial markers. A comparison of dose-volume histograms relative to CTV, rectum, bladder and femoral heads was performed for both studies. Image fusion showed a mean overestimation of CTV of 34% with CT compared with MRI. Along the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior direction, CTV was a mean 5 mm larger with CT study compared with MRI. The dose-volume histograms resulting from CT and MRI comparison showed that it is possible to spare a mean 10% of rectal volume and approximately 5% of bladder and femoral heads, respectively. This study confirmed an overestimation of CTV with CT images compared with MRI. Because this finding only allows a minimal sparing of organs at risk, considering the organ motion during each radiotherapy session and the excellent outcomes of prostate cancer treatment with CT based target identification, we are still reluctant to reduce the CTV to that identified by MRI.

[1]  M van Herk,et al.  Definition of the prostate in CT and MRI: a multi-observer study. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  Mageras,et al.  Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. , 1992, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[3]  H M Sandler,et al.  Localization of the prostatic apex for radiation therapy using implanted markers. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  Consensus statement: the Management of Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. , 1988, NCI monographs : a publication of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  H M Pollack,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate gland , 1990, Urologic radiology.

[6]  R Mohan,et al.  The biological basis and clinical application of three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy in carcinoma of the prostate. , 1994, Seminars in oncology.

[7]  P H Bland,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate: MR images obtained with body coils do not accurately reflect tumor volume. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[8]  G E Hanks,et al.  Initial clinical assessment of CT-MRI image fusion software in localization of the prostate for 3D conformal radiation therapy. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification and predictors of prostate position variability in 50 patients evaluated with multiple CT scans during conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Hanks Ge External-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: patterns of care studies in the United States. , 1988 .

[11]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Variation in prostate position quantitation and implications for three-dimensional conformal treatment planning. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): considerations and applications in radiotherapy treatment planning. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  H. Hricak,et al.  Prostate volumes defined by magnetic resonance imaging and computerized tomographic scans for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  R. Herfkens,et al.  Determining the volume of prostatic carcinoma: value of MR imaging with an external-array coil. , 1993, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  D P Dearnaley,et al.  Comparison of MRI with CT for the radiotherapy planning of prostate cancer: a feasibility study. , 1999, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  J R Thornbury,et al.  Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.