Efficiently Approximating the Pareto Frontier: Hydropower Dam Placement in the Amazon Basin

Real–world problems are often not fully characterized by a single optimal solution, as they frequently involve multiple competing objectives; it is therefore important to identify the so-called Pareto frontier, which captures solution trade-offs. We propose a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme based on Dynamic Programming (DP) for computing a polynomially succinct curve that approximates the Pareto frontier to within an arbitrarily small > 0 on treestructured networks. Given a set of objectives, our approximation scheme runs in time polynomial in the size of the instance and 1/ . We also propose a Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) scheme to approximate the Pareto frontier. The DP and MIP Pareto frontier approaches have complementary strengths and are surprisingly effective. We provide empirical results showing that our methods outperform other approaches in efficiency and accuracy. Our work is motivated by a problem in computational sustainability concerning the proliferation of hydropower dams throughout the Amazon basin. Our goal is to support decision-makers in evaluating impacted ecosystem services on the full scale of the Amazon basin. Our work is general and can be applied to approximate the Pareto frontier of a variety of multiobjective problems on tree-structured networks.

[1]  Yang Yu,et al.  Pareto Ensemble Pruning , 2015, AAAI.

[2]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Dam choices: Analyses for multiple needs , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Selection Hyper-heuristics Can Provably Be Helpful in Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization , 2016, PPSN.

[4]  Rina Dechter,et al.  Bucket elimination: A unifying framework for probabilistic inference , 1996, UAI.

[5]  Vasco M. Manquinho,et al.  Introducing Pareto Minimal Correction Subsets , 2017, SAT.

[6]  K. Tockner,et al.  A global boom in hydropower dam construction , 2014, Aquatic Sciences.

[7]  Clinton N. Jenkins,et al.  Proliferation of Hydroelectric Dams in the Andean Amazon and Implications for Andes-Amazon Connectivity , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Matthias Ehrgott,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making for engineering , 2008 .

[9]  Laura L. Hess,et al.  An explicit GIS-based river basin framework for aquatic ecosystem conservation in the Amazon , 2016 .

[10]  J. Lundberg,et al.  Balancing hydropower and biodiversity in the Amazon, Congo, and Mekong , 2016, Science.

[11]  Xavier Gandibleux,et al.  A survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization , 2000, OR Spectr..

[12]  C. Gomes.  Computational Sustainability: Computational methods for a sustainable environment, economy, and society , 2009 .

[13]  David P. Williamson,et al.  The Design of Approximation Algorithms , 2011 .

[14]  Yang Yu,et al.  An analysis on recombination in multi-objective evolutionary optimization , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Dario Izzo,et al.  The asynchronous island model and NSGA-II: study of a new migration operator and its performance , 2013, GECCO '13.

[16]  Oliver Giel,et al.  Expected runtimes of a simple multi-objective evolutionary algorithm , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[17]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Rounded Dynamic Programming for Tree-Structured Stochastic Network Design , 2014, AAAI.

[18]  Kaye M. Shedlock,et al.  The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map , 2000 .

[19]  S. Levin,et al.  Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  Shlomo Zilberstein,et al.  Stochastic Network Design in Bidirected Trees , 2014, NIPS.

[21]  Mihalis Yannakakis,et al.  On the approximability of trade-offs and optimal access of Web sources , 2000, Proceedings 41st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science.