Fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA

Previous attempts to quantify topographic controls on vegetation have often been frustrated by issues concerning the number of variables of interest and the tendency of classification methods to create discrete classes though species have overlapping property sets (niches). Methods of fuzzy k-means classification have been used to address class overlap in ecological and geographical data but previously their usefulness has been limited when data sets are large or include artefacts that may occur through the derivation of topo-climatic attributes from gridded digital elevation models. This paper presents ways to overcome these limitations using GIS, spatial sampling methods, fuzzy k-means classification, and statistical modelling of the derived stream topology. Using data from a ca. 3600 km2 forested site in the Greater Yellowstone Area, we demonstrate the creation of meaningful, spatially coherent topo-climatic classes through a fuzzy k-means classification of topo-climatic data derived from 100 m gridded digital elevation models (DEMs); these classes were successfully extrapolated to adjacent areas covering a total of ca. 10 000 km2. Independently derived land cover data and middle infrared corrected Landsat TM derived estimates of Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (M_NDVI) at 575 independently sampled sites were used to evaluate the topo-climatic classes and test their extrapolation to the larger area. Relations between topo-climatic classes and land cover were tested by χ2 analysis which demonstrated strong associations between topo-climatic class and 11 of the 15 cover classes. Relations between M_NDVI and topo-climatic classes proved to be stronger than relations between M_NDVI and the independent cover classes. We conclude that the fuzzy k-means procedure yields sensible and stable topo-climatic classes that can be used for the rapid mapping of large areas. The value of these methods for quantifying topographic controls on biodiversity and the strength of their relations with computed NDVI values warrant further investigation.

[1]  A Koestler,et al.  Ghost in the Machine , 1970 .

[2]  R. Webster,et al.  COMPUTER‐BASED SOIL MAPPING OF SMALL AREAS FROM SAMPLE DATA , 1972 .

[3]  W. Romme,et al.  FIRE AND LANDSCAPE DIVERSITY IN SUBALPINE FORESTS OF YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK , 1982 .

[4]  J. Bezdek,et al.  FCM: The fuzzy c-means clustering algorithm , 1984 .

[5]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[6]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  The application of fuzzy c-means cluster analysis and non-linear mapping to geochemical datasets: examples from Portugal , 1988 .

[7]  Michael F. Hutchinson,et al.  Assessing representativeness of places for conservation reservation and heritage listing , 1988 .

[8]  M. Hutchinson.  A new procedure for gridding elevation and stream line data with automatic removal of spurious pits , 1989 .

[9]  Norman L. Christensen,et al.  Interpreting the Yellowstone Fires of 1988Ecosystem responses and management implications , 1989 .

[10]  David W. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[11]  D. Despain.  Yellowstone Vegetation: Consequences of Environment and History in a Natural Setting , 1990 .

[12]  I. Moore,et al.  Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications , 1991 .

[13]  K. Albrecht.  Problems of modelling and forecasting on the basis of phenomenological investigations , 1992 .

[14]  Ruprecht Düll,et al.  Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa , 1992 .

[15]  I. Moore,et al.  Length-slope factors for the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation: simplified method of estimation , 1992 .

[16]  David J. Mulla,et al.  Geostatistical Tools for Modeling and Interpreting Ecological Spatial Dependence , 1992 .

[17]  S. Running,et al.  Forest ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: Sensitivity to remotely-sensed leaf area index estimates , 1993 .

[18]  Michael F. Goodchild,et al.  GIS and land-surface-subsurface modeling. , 1993 .

[19]  D. Tilman.  Competition and Biodiversity in Spatially Structured Habitats , 1994 .

[20]  J. Franklin.  Predictive vegetation mapping: geographic modelling of biospatial patterns in relation to environmental gradients , 1995 .

[21]  Derek Karssenberg,et al.  Integrating dynamic environmental models in GIS: The development of a Dynamic Modelling language , 1996, Trans. GIS.

[22]  R. W. Fitzgerald,et al.  Temporal context in floristic classification , 1996 .

[23]  P. Lagacherie,et al.  Fuzzy k-means clustering of fields in an elementary catchment and extrapolation to a larger area , 1997 .

[24]  Trevor J. Davis,et al.  Modelling Uncertainty in Natural Resource Analysis Using Fuzzy Sets and Monte Carlo Simulation: Slope Stability Prediction , 1997, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[25]  P.F.M. van Gaans,et al.  Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries , 1997 .

[26]  Richard L. Church,et al.  Selecting conservation reserves using species‐covering models: Adapting the ARC/INFO GIS , 1997, Trans. GIS.

[27]  P. Burrough,et al.  Principles of geographical information systems , 1998 .

[28]  Daniel W. McKenney,et al.  Towards a Spatial Model of Boreal Forest Ecosystems: The Role of Digital Terrain Analysis , 2000 .

[29]  P. John,et al.  Effect of data source, grid resolution, and flow-routing method on computed topographic attributes , 2000 .

[30]  Janet Franklin,et al.  Terrain variables used for predictive mapping of vegetation communities in southern California , 2000 .

[31]  Peter A. Burrough,et al.  High-resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means , 2000, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[32]  M. Austin,et al.  New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures , 1984, Vegetatio.