Detecting Problems in Military Expenditure Data Using Digital Analysis

The UN asks governments to report key figures of their annual military budgets with the aim of creating trust among member states. This goal can only be achieved if the data reported is accurate. However, although there are many reasons for governments to falsify data, the UN does not check for manipulation. In this paper, we apply Benford’s law to the military expenditure data of 27 states taken from the UN register. Our analysis of the first digits shows that the states with the greatest deviations from the expected Benford distribution and therefore the lowest data quality are the USA and the UK.

[1]  Bernd Beber,et al.  What the Numbers Say: A Digit-Based Test for Election Fraud , 2012, Political Analysis.

[2]  Bernhard Rauch,et al.  Fact and Fiction in EU-Governmental Economic Data , 2011 .

[3]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud , 2011, Political Analysis.

[4]  W. Mebane.  Comment on “Benford's Law and the Detection of Election Fraud” , 2011, Political Analysis.

[5]  W. Krämer.  The Cult of Statistical Signi ficance - What Economists Should and Should Not Do To Make Their Data Talk , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[6]  Ben Jann,et al.  Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection: Facts and Legends , 2010 .

[7]  Walter R. Mebane,et al.  Fraud in the 2009 Presidential Election in Iran? , 2010 .

[8]  Karl-Heinz Tödter,et al.  Benford’s Law as an Indicator of Fraud in Economics , 2009 .

[9]  Stefan Günnel,et al.  Does Benford’s Law hold in economic research and forecasting? , 2009 .

[10]  Manuela Möller,et al.  Measuring the Quality of Auditing Services with the Help of Benford’s Law - An Empirical Analysis and Discussion of this Methodical Approach , 2009 .

[11]  C. Watrin,et al.  Benford’s Law: an instrument for selecting tax audit targets? , 2008 .

[12]  George G. Judge,et al.  Detecting Problems in Survey Data Using Benford’s Law , 2007, The Journal of Human Resources.

[13]  Kenneth M. Dye.  Corruption and Fraud Detection by Public Sector Auditors , 2007 .

[14]  Brian J. Gaines,et al.  Breaking the (Benford) Law , 2007 .

[15]  Charles C. Moul,et al.  The Political Economy of Numbers: On the Application of Benford's Law to International Macroeconomic Statistics , 2007 .

[16]  Andreas Diekmann,et al.  Not the First Digit! Using Benford's Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientif ic Data , 2007 .

[17]  David C. Yang,et al.  Auditing, integral approach to quarterly reporting, and cosmetic earnings management , 2006 .

[18]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Automatie Identification of Faked and Fraudulent Interviews in the German SOEP , 2005, Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch.

[19]  L. Guan,et al.  Anomalies and Unusual Patterns in Reported Earnings: Japanese Managers Round Earnings , 2004 .

[20]  Ricardo J. Rodríguez.  Reducing False Alarms in the Detection of Human Influence on Data , 2004 .

[21]  J. Kinnunen,et al.  Who Is Miss World in Cosmetic Earnings Management? A Cross‐National Comparison of Small Upward Rounding of Net Income Numbers among Eighteen Countries , 2003 .

[22]  T. V. Caneghem,et al.  The impact of audit quality on earnings rounding-up behaviour: some UK evidence , 2002 .

[23]  T. Caneghem,et al.  Earnings Management Induced by Cognitive Reference Points , 2002 .

[24]  B. Schmeiser,et al.  Survival Distributions Satisfying Benford's Law , 2000 .

[25]  Matti Keloharju,et al.  Earnings cosmetics in a tax-driven accounting environment: evidence from Finnish public firms , 2000 .

[26]  G. Dhaene,et al.  On the hypothesis of psychological barriers in stock markets and Benford's Law , 1998 .

[27]  M. Nigrini,et al.  The Use of Benford's Law as an Aid in Analytical Procedures , 1997 .

[28]  E. Ley.  On the Peculiar Distribution of the U.S. Stock Indexes' Digits , 1996 .

[29]  T. Hill.  A Statistical Derivation of the Significant-Digit Law , 1995 .

[30]  H. Varian,et al.  Are there Psychological Barriers in the Dow-Jones Index? , 1994 .

[31]  R. A. Raimi.  The First Digit Problem , 1976 .

[32]  Roger S. Pinkham,et al.  On the Distribution of First Significant Digits , 1961 .

[33]  G. Pastor,et al.  Benford's Law and Macroeconomic Data Quality , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[34]  Charles Tiefer.  The Iraq Debacle: The Rise and Fall of Procurement-Aided Unilateralism as a Paradigm of Foreign War , 2007 .

[35]  Walter R. Mebane,et al.  Election Forensics: The Second-digit Benford's Law Test and Recent American Presidential Elections , 2006 .

[36]  D. Giles,et al.  BENFORD ’ S LAW AND NATURALLY OCCURRING PRICES IN CERTAIN ebaY AUCTIONS * , 2005 .

[37]  M. Nigrini.  An Assessment of the Change in the Incidence of Earnings Management Around the Enron‐Andersen Episode , 2005 .

[38]  Cindy Durtschi,et al.  The effective use of Benford's Law to assist in detecting fraud in accounting data , 2004 .

[39]  Jacob K. Thomas.  UNUSUAL PATTERNS IN REPORTED EARNINGS , 1988 .

[40]  Simon Newcomb,et al.  Note on the Frequency of Use of the Different Digits in Natural Numbers , 1881 .