Firm Size Distribution and Growth

Abstract Empirical documentation of the sectoral distribution of firm size for a set of European countries reveals substantial differences. We study the relationship between productivity growth at the industry level and size structure. A positive and robust relation is found between average firm size and growth. We ask why size should matter for growth by considering the role of innovation to construct a test based on the differential effect of size on growth according to various indicators of R&D intensity. Our results indicate that larger size fosters productivity growth because it allows firms to take advantage of all the increasing returns associated with R&D. We argue that our test can be interpreted as a test of reverse causality, which lends support to the view that firm size has a causal impact on growth.

[1]  D. Audretsch.  Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity , 1998 .

[2]  Scott D. Schuh,et al.  Small Business and Job Creation: Dissecting the Myth and Reassessing Thefacts , 1993 .

[3]  Boyan Jovanovic.  Selection and the evolution of industry , 1981 .

[4]  Krishna B. Kumar,et al.  What Determines Firm Size? , 1999 .

[5]  R. Barro,et al.  International Comparisons of Educational Attainment , 1993 .

[6]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[7]  M. Carree,et al.  Industrial structure and economic growth , 1999 .

[8]  I Just Ran Four Million Regressions , 1997 .

[9]  M. Amiti.  Specialisation patterns in Europe , 1997 .

[10]  J. Steindl.  Small and big business : economic problems of the size of firms , 1947 .

[11]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  M. Amiti,et al.  Specialization patterns in Europe , 1999 .

[13]  P. S. Florence,et al.  Small and big business , 1945 .

[14]  FlRM SlZE.  INNOVATION, FIRM SIZE AND MARKET STRUCTURE: SCHUMPETERIAN HYPOTHESES AND SOME NEW THEMES , 1996 .

[15]  G. Symeonidis,et al.  Innovation, firm size and market structure , 1996 .

[16]  J. Tirole,et al.  Financial Intermediation, Loanable Funds, and The Real Sector , 1997 .

[17]  M. Carree,et al.  Small firms and economic growth in europe , 1998 .

[18]  Hugo Hopenhayn.  Entry, exit, and firm dynamics in long run equilibrium , 1992 .

[19]  R. Domènech,et al.  Instituto de Análisis Económico (CSIC) and , 2000 .

[20]  S. Davis,et al.  Explaining National Differences in the Size and Industry Distribution Employment , 1997 .

[21]  P. Peretto.  Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth , 1999 .

[22]  Andrew B. Bernard,et al.  Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement across Industries and Countries , 2001 .

[23]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[24]  Steven Klepper,et al.  A Reprise of Size and R & D , 1996 .

[25]  Raimar Richers.  The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[26]  Steven J. Davis,et al.  Small business and job creation: Dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts , 1994, Labor Markets, Employment Policy, and Job Creation.

[27]  A. Pakes,et al.  Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical Work , 1995 .

[28]  T. C. Edens,et al.  Economic Growth , 1957, The Journal of Economic History.

[29]  Firm Size, Rivalry and the Extent of the Market in Endogenous Technological Change , 1996 .

[30]  Jacob Viner,et al.  Cost curves and supply curves , 1932 .

[31]  Luigi Zingales,et al.  Financial Dependence and Growth , 1996 .

[32]  Matteo Bugamelli.  Il modello di specializzazione internazionale dell'Italia e dei principali paesi europei: omogeneit� e convergenza , 2001 .

[33]  Larry Samuelson,et al.  The Growth and Failure of U. S. Manufacturing Plants , 1989 .

[34]  A. Pakes,et al.  Computing Markov Perfect Nash Equilibria: Numerical Implications of a Dynamic Differentiated Product Model , 1992 .

[35]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of Firm Entry and Exit in U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 1988 .

[36]  P. Peretto.  Technological Change, Market Rivalry, and the Evolution of the Capitalist Engine of Growth , 1998 .

[37]  Richard C. Levin,et al.  Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers , 1988 .

[38]  Luigi Guiso,et al.  Information Spillovers and Factor Adjustment , 2000 .

[39]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Institutional Effects on the Evolution of the Size Distribution of Firms , 2007 .

[40]  J. Vickers,et al.  A Model of the Evolution of Duopoly: Does the Asymmetry between Firms Tend to Increase or Decrease? , 1993 .

[41]  X. Sala-i-Martin,et al.  I Just Ran Four Million Regressions , 1997 .