Structural biology of allergens.

One of the major challenges of molecular allergy is to predict the allergenic potential of a protein, particularly in novel foods. Two aspects have to be distinguished: immunogenicity and cross-reactivity. Immunogenicity reflects the potential of a protein to induce IgE antibodies, whereas cross-reactivity is the reactivity of (usually preexisting) IgE antibodies with the target protein. In addition to these two issues, the relation between IgE-binding potential and clinical symptoms is of interest. This is influenced by physical properties (eg, stability and size) and immunologic properties (affinity and epitope valence). Discussions on immunogenicity and cross-reactivity of allergens rely on the establishment of structural similarities and differences among allergens and between allergens and nonallergens. For comparisons between the 3-dimensional protein folds, the representation as 2-dimensional proximity plots provides a convenient visual aid. Analysis of approximately 40 allergenic proteins (or parts of these proteins), of which the protein folds are either known or can be predicted on the basis of homology, indicates that most of these can be classified into 4 structural families: (1) antiparallel beta-strands: the immunoglobulin-fold family (grass group 2, mite group 2), serine proteases (mite group 3, 6, and 9), and soybean-type trypsin inhibitor (Ole e 1, grass group 11); (2) antiparallel beta-sheets intimately associated with one or more alpha-helices: tree group 1, lipocalin, profilin, aspartate protease (cockroach group 2); (3) (alpha+beta) structures, in which the alpha- and beta-structural elements are not intimately associated: mite group 1, lysozyme/lactalbumin, vespid group 5; and (4) alpha-helical: nonspecific lipid transfer protein, seed 2S protein, insect hemoglobin, fish parvalbumin, pollen calmodulin, mellitin from bee venom, Fel d 1 chain 1, serum albumin. Allergens with parallel beta-strands (in combination with an alpha-helix linking the two strands, a motif commonly found in, for example, nucleotide-binding proteins) seem to be underrepresented. The conclusion is that allergens have no characteristic structural features other than that they need to be able to reach (and stimulate) immune cells and mast cells. Within this constraint, any antigen may be allergenic, particularly if it avoids activation of T(H)2-suppressive mechanisms (CD8 cells and T(H)1 cells).

[1]  T. Lee,et al.  IgE production, antigen-induced airway inflammation and airway hyperreactivity in the brown Norway rat: the effects of ricin. , 1995, Immunology.

[2]  C. Sander,et al.  Protein structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  D. Beezhold,et al.  Cloning and characterization of a latex allergen (Hev b 7): homology to patatin, a plant PLA2 , 1998, Clinical and experimental immunology.

[4]  G. Stewart Dust mite allergens , 1995, Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology.

[5]  P. Thompson,et al.  Der p 1 facilitates transepithelial allergen delivery by disruption of tight junctions. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  H. Sewell,et al.  A mite subversive: cleavage of CD23 and CD25 by Der p 1 enhances allergenicity. , 1998, Immunology today.

[7]  C Sander,et al.  Dictionary of recurrent domains in protein structures , 1998, Proteins.

[8]  L. C. Loon,et al.  The families of pathogenesis-related proteins, their activities, and comparative analysis of PR-1 type proteins , 1999 .

[9]  H. Sewell,et al.  The Cysteine Protease Activity of the Major Dust Mite Allergen Der P 1 Selectively Enhances the Immunoglobulin E Antibody Response , 1999, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[10]  E. Padlan,et al.  X-ray crystallography of antibodies. , 1996, Advances in protein chemistry.

[11]  R. Mäntyjärvi,et al.  Important Animal Allergens Are Lipocalin Proteins: Why Are They Allergenic? , 1999, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[12]  R. Ree,et al.  Crossreactive carbohydrate determinants , 1997, Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology.

[13]  G. Reese,et al.  Why are some proteins allergenic? Implications for biotechnology. , 1996, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[14]  S. Wagner,et al.  Cloning of the Patatin–Like Latex Allergen Hev b 7, Its Expression in the Yeast Pichia pastoris and Its Immunological Characterization , 1999, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[15]  N. Kerkvliet,et al.  Toxicology of protein allergenicity: prediction and characterization. , 1999, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[16]  A. Fedorov,et al.  The molecular basis for allergen cross-reactivity: crystal structure and IgE-epitope mapping of birch pollen profilin. , 1997, Structure.

[17]  B. Baldo,et al.  Penicillins and cephalosporins as allergens — structural aspects of recognition and cross‐reactions , 1999, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[18]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP: a structural classification of proteins database , 1998, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  H. Sewell,et al.  The interaction between the dust mite antigen Der p 1 and cell‐signalling molecules in amplifying allergic disease , 1999, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[20]  R. Jaussi,et al.  Humoral and cell-mediated autoimmunity in allergy to Aspergillus fumigatus , 1996, Journal of Experimental Medicine.

[21]  Jérôme Gouzy,et al.  Recent improvements of the ProDom database of protein domain families , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[22]  T Reunala,et al.  Identification of patatin as a novel allergen for children with positive skin prick test responses to raw potato. , 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[23]  Chris Sander,et al.  Protein folds and families: sequence and structure alignments , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  S. Taylor,et al.  Assessment of the allergenic potential of foods derived from genetically engineered crop plants. , 1996, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[25]  J. Tainer,et al.  Purification and crystallization of a schistosomal glutathione S‐Transferase , 1995, Proteins.

[26]  N. Kalsheker,et al.  On the potential significance of the enzymatic activity of mite allergens to immunogenicity. Clues to structure and function revealed by molecular characterization , 1997, Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology.

[27]  T. Bhat,et al.  Crystallographic refinement of the three-dimensional structure of the FabD1.3-lysozyme complex at 2.5-A resolution. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[28]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[29]  Shmuel Pietrokovski,et al.  The Blocks database--a system for protein classification , 1996, Nucleic Acids Res..

[30]  P. Hufnagl,et al.  Characterization of IgE–Reactive Autoantigens in Atopic Dermatitis , 1999, International Archives of Allergy and Immunology.

[31]  W. R. Peterson,et al.  Cloning and sequencing of a gene encoding a 2S albumin seed storage protein precursor from English walnut (Juglans regia), a major food allergen. , 1998, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology.

[32]  R. Valenta,et al.  Identification of profilin as a novel pollen allergen; IgE autoreactivity in sensitized individuals. , 1991, Science.

[33]  M. Sundaralingam,et al.  Crystallographic analysis of the three-dimensional structure of baboon alpha-lactalbumin at low resolution. Homology with lysozyme. , 1987, The Biochemical journal.

[34]  Roy L. Fuchs,et al.  Stability of food allergens to digestion in vitro , 1996, Nature Biotechnology.