Enhancing the effectiveness of multi-agent cooperation for green manufacturing: Dynamic co-evolution mechanism of a green technology innovation system based on the innovation value chain

Abstract A virtuous cycle of the green technology innovation (GTI) system (GTIS) can not only effectively serve GTI subjects in the system but also fully improve green manufacturing and reduce environmental pollution. The essence of the GTIS evolution of manufacturing enterprises (MEs) under multi-agent cooperation (MEUMAC) is encouraged by governments and led by MEs, which jointly promote the process of GTIS from low-end to high-end through interaction with universities, research institutions, supply chains, intermediaries and consumers. MEs cooperate with multiple GTI subjects to continuously improve the GTI level of MEUMAC, and the subsystems of the GTIS interact and coordinate dynamically. To promote the upgrade of the GTIS under multi-agent cooperation, the dynamic co-evolution mechanism of the GTIS needs to be explored. Innovation process is a value chain that transforms from knowledge creation to product promotion based on the innovation value chain. Based on system theory, this process can be solved through five parts: input, processing, output, feedback and upgrade. The structure and evolution path of the GTIS were analysed based on the innovation value chain theory and system theory. Logistic symbiotic response system is a typical system with self-organization characteristics, and the development law of the GTIS of MEUMAC is similar with the symbiotic system. Hence, an evolution model based on a Logistic model was constructed to determine state and control variables. The results show that the evolution of the GTIS of MEUMAC is the spatial advancement and temporal evolution of the system under the action of internal and external subjects, which is ultimately manifested as the process of the GTI performance output. The operation status of green technology is a key factor in the dynamic co-evolution of the GTIS of MEUMAC, which is the order parameter of the system. Environmental regulation policies (ERPs) have a strong positive incentive effect on the dynamic co-evolution of the GTIS of MEUMAC. Regarding the current ERPs, the effect intensity of different policies is command regulation, market regulation, public participation regulation and voluntary action regulation. The results of this study not only help MEs to optimize the implementation process of the GTIS and provide practical guidance to formulate ERPs but also extend the theoretical system of co-evolution and enrich the innovation value chain theory.

[1]  Andrew P. McCoy,et al.  Diffusion of green building technologies in new housing construction , 2015 .

[2]  K. Motohashi,et al.  University-industry interaction and product innovation performance of Guangdong manufacturing firms: the roles of regional proximity and research quality of universities , 2020, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[3]  Ching‐Hsun Chang The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation , 2011 .

[4]  C. Braumann,et al.  General population growth models with Allee effects in a random environment , 2017 .

[5]  F. Zhang,et al.  The effects of organizational controls on innovation modes: An ambidexterity perspective , 2017, Journal of Management & Organization.

[6]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  External learning, market dynamics, and radical innovation: Evidence from China's high-tech firms , 2012 .

[7]  Janice Jones,et al.  Doing well by doing good: a study of university-industry interactions, innovationess and firm performance in sustainability-oriented Australian SMEs , 2017 .

[8]  M. Porter,et al.  Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship , 1995 .

[9]  H. Buhaug,et al.  Green economy, degradation narratives, and land-use conflicts in Tanzania , 2020 .

[10]  Mitsutsugu Hamamoto,et al.  Environmental regulation and the productivity of Japanese manufacturing industries , 2006 .

[11]  Shenggang Ren,et al.  Can environmental regulation promote the coordinated development of economy and environment in China’s manufacturing industry?–A panel data analysis of 28 sub-sectors , 2017 .

[12]  H. Ren,et al.  Cooperative Innovation Evolutionary Game Analysis of Industrialized Building Supply Chain , 2018 .

[13]  Junhong Bai,et al.  Market segmentation, resource misallocation and environmental pollution , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[14]  D. Slepniov,et al.  Technology Transmission Across National Innovation Systems: The Role of Danish Suppliers in Upgrading the Wind Energy Industry in China , 2018, The European Journal of Development Research.

[15]  Chih-Hai Yang,et al.  Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan's manufacturing industries , 2012 .

[16]  A. Isaksen,et al.  Regional industrial restructuring resulting from individual and system agency , 2018, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.

[17]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Environment and Directed Technical Change , 2009, The American economic review.

[18]  Ying Wang,et al.  Reinforcing green competitive advantage through green production, creativity and green brand image: Implications for cleaner production in China , 2020 .

[19]  Ying Wang,et al.  Process optimization of the University-Industry-Research collaborative innovation from the perspective of knowledge management , 2018, Cognitive Systems Research.

[20]  E. Sarmento,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Job Creation, and Growth in Fast-Growing Firms in Portugal: Is There a Role for Policy? , 2015 .

[21]  Joshua P. Meltzer,et al.  A Carbon Tax as a Driver of Green Technology Innovation and the Implications for International Trade , 2014 .

[22]  K. Fichter,et al.  The diffusion of environmental product and service innovations: Driving and inhibiting factors , 2019, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions.

[23]  Antonio Hidalgo,et al.  Diffusion of eco-innovations: A review , 2014 .

[24]  R. Zhao,et al.  Strategic green technology innovation in a two-stage alliance: Vertical collaboration or co-development? , 2019 .

[25]  Javier Aguilera-Caracuel,et al.  Green Innovation and Financial Performance , 2013 .

[26]  Jun Tanimoto,et al.  Coevolutionary, coexisting learning and teaching agents model for prisoner’s dilemma games enhancing cooperation with assortative heterogeneous networks , 2013 .

[27]  Yi Ruan,et al.  Government׳s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: The case of the electric bike in China , 2014 .

[28]  C. Rammer,et al.  Determinants of Eco-innovations by Type of Environmental Impact: The Role of Regulatory Push/Pull, Technology Push and Market Pull , 2011 .

[29]  S. Managi,et al.  Decomposition analysis of sustainable green technology inventions in China , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[30]  He Xu,et al.  Analyzing the environmental and economic impact of industrial transfer based on an improved CGE model: Taking the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region as an example , 2020, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[31]  N. Zhang,et al.  Preventing COVID-19 from the perspective of industrial information integration: Evaluation and continuous improvement of information networks for sustainable epidemic prevention , 2020, Journal of Industrial Information Integration.

[32]  A. Bellucci,et al.  University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries , 2014 .

[33]  S. Singh,et al.  Green innovation and organizational performance: The influence of big data and the moderating role of management commitment and HR practices , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[34]  Smita B. Brunnermeier,et al.  Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries , 2003 .

[35]  P. Driessen,et al.  Evaluating environmental policy instruments mixes; a methodology illustrated by noise policy in the Netherlands , 2014 .

[36]  C. Ghisetti,et al.  Green Technologies and Environmental Productivity: A Cross-sectoral Analysis of Direct and Indirect Effects in Italian Regions , 2017 .

[37]  Lopin Kuo,et al.  The impacts of government policies on green utilization diffusion and social benefits – A case study of electric motorcycles in Taiwan , 2018, Energy Policy.

[38]  Charbel José Chiappetta Jabbour,et al.  Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[39]  Minna Saunila,et al.  Sustainability as a driver of green innovation investment and exploitation , 2017 .

[40]  M. Valente,et al.  The role of finance in environmental innovation diffusion: An evolutionary modeling approach , 2019, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

[41]  Aihua Wu,et al.  Impact of specific investments, governance mechanisms and behaviors on the performance of cooperative innovation projects , 2017 .

[42]  H. Vollebergh,et al.  The Role of Standards in Eco-innovation: Lessons for Policymakers , 2013, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[43]  Marcelo Seido Nagano,et al.  Information culture and its influences in knowledge creation: Evidence from university teams engaged in collaborative innovation projects , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[44]  Yi Su,et al.  Simulation Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in a Knowledge Alliance Based on a Circular Surface Radiator Model , 2020, Complex..

[45]  Zhiying Liu,et al.  Performance evaluation of China's high-tech innovation process: Analysis based on the innovation value chain , 2018, Technovation.