Low-light-level image super-resolution reconstruction based on iterative projection photon localization algorithm

Abstract. The intensified charge-coupled device (ICCD) is widely used in the field of low-light-level (LLL) imaging. The LLL images captured by ICCD suffer from low spatial resolution and contrast, and the target details can hardly be recognized. Super-resolution (SR) reconstruction of LLL images captured by ICCDs is a challenging issue. The dispersion in the double-proximity-focused image intensifier is the main factor that leads to a reduction in image resolution and contrast. We divide the integration time into subintervals that are short enough to get photon images, so the overlapping effect and overstacking effect of dispersion can be eliminated. We propose an SR reconstruction algorithm based on iterative projection photon localization. In the iterative process, the photon image is sliced by projection planes, and photons are screened under the constraints of regularity. The accurate position information of the incident photons in the reconstructed SR image is obtained by the weighted centroids calculation. The experimental results show that the spatial resolution and contrast of our SR image are significantly improved.

[1]  S. Suzuki,et al.  A computer simulation study on electron multiplication of parallel‐plate electron multipliers , 1993 .

[2]  B. Manley,et al.  The Mechanism of Channel Electron Multiplication , 1966 .

[3]  I. Tolic-Nørrelykke,et al.  A divide and conquer strategy for the maximum likelihood localization of low intensity objects. , 2014, Optics express.

[4]  Shmuel Peleg,et al.  Robust super-resolution , 2001, Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2001.

[5]  E. Eberhardt,et al.  Gain model for microchannel plates. , 1979, Applied optics.

[6]  A. Bovik,et al.  Image quality assessment , 2019, Machine Learning for Tomographic Imaging.

[7]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[8]  Thomas S. Huang,et al.  Image Super-Resolution Via Sparse Representation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Xiaoou Tang,et al.  Learning a Deep Convolutional Network for Image Super-Resolution , 2014, ECCV.

[10]  David Dussault,et al.  Noise performance comparison of ICCD with CCD and EMCCD cameras , 2004, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[11]  J. Lapington,et al.  Spatial charge cloud distribution of microchannel plates , 1989 .

[12]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Normalized and differential convolution , 1993, Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[13]  B. C. Carter,et al.  Tracking single particles: a user-friendly quantitative evaluation , 2005, Physical biology.

[14]  Ralf Widenhorn,et al.  Temperature dependence of dark current in a CCD , 2002, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[15]  R. Bell,et al.  Noise figure of the MCP image intensifier tube , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[16]  R. Widenhorn,et al.  Exposure Time Dependence of Dark Current in CCD Imagers , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[17]  Yoram Bresler,et al.  Structured Overcomplete Sparsifying Transform Learning with Convergence Guarantees and Applications , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[18]  Alessandro Foi,et al.  Image Denoising by Sparse 3-D Transform-Domain Collaborative Filtering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[19]  Michael Elad,et al.  Restoration of a single superresolution image from several blurred, noisy, and undersampled measured images , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[20]  Michael Elad,et al.  On Single Image Scale-Up Using Sparse-Representations , 2010, Curves and Surfaces.

[21]  Klamer Schutte,et al.  Robust Fusion of Irregularly Sampled Data Using Adaptive Normalized Convolution , 2006, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[22]  Michal Irani,et al.  Improving resolution by image registration , 1991, CVGIP Graph. Model. Image Process..

[23]  Roger Y. Tsai,et al.  Multiframe image restoration and registration , 1984 .

[24]  W. Webb,et al.  Automated detection and tracking of individual and clustered cell surface low density lipoprotein receptor molecules. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Maria Petrou,et al.  Robust Bayesian Estimation and Normalized Convolution for Super-resolution Image Reconstruction , 2007, 2007 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[26]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  H Stark,et al.  High-resolution image recovery from image-plane arrays, using convex projections. , 1989, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[28]  Miguel Enrique Bravo-Zanoguera,et al.  Use of the Modulation Transfer Function to Measure Quality of Digital Cameras , 2006, 16th International Conference on Electronics, Communications and Computers (CONIELECOMP'06).