Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: 5 years' experience in a community hospital.

OBJECTIVE This study reports the results of a percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy program in a community hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS We reviewed the prospectively collected results of our imaging-guided core biopsy program during its first 5 years (1994-1998). A total of 1333 lesions (94% of which were Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) assessment category 4) were sampled in 1183 patients. Patients with BI-RADS assessment category 5 lesions were referred to surgeons. Stereotactic guidance was used for the core biopsy of 506 lesions, and sonography was used to guide the predominantly 16-gauge needle core biopsy of 827 solid masses. RESULTS One hundred forty-seven cancers were diagnosed in 1333 biopsies, resulting in a positive yield of 11%. Of 1020 patients with benign, concordant core biopsy results, 981 (96%) had at least one follow-up imaging examination within 36 months of the biopsy. Nineteen (2%) of these 1020 patients had a suspicious change at follow-up; 18 of these patients underwent surgical excision with benign findings. No cancers were found at imaging follow-up or by tumor registry linkage. All malignant core biopsy results were confirmed as malignant at surgical excision (positive predictive value 100%). Twenty-two patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia at core biopsy had subsequent surgery, and 12 (55%) of them were found to have cancer at surgery. CONCLUSION An imaging-guided core biopsy program, developed and implemented by a small group of radiologists in a community hospital, can achieve successful results and provide an important service to patients and a cost-effective alternative to surgical biopsy. Our program emphasized sonographic guidance and achieved high follow-up compliance.

[1]  L. Liberman,et al.  Palpable breast masses: is there a role for percutaneous imaging-guided core biopsy? , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[2]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Clinical outcome of doubtful mammographic findings. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[4]  L. Liberman,et al.  Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. , 1997, Radiology.

[5]  I Tocino,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic core needle biopsy: analysis by means of mammographic findings. , 1997, Radiology.

[6]  C. J. Rosenquist,et al.  Needle core biopsy guided with mammography: a study of cost-effectiveness. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  L L Fajardo,et al.  Stereotactic core-needle breast biopsy: a multi-institutional prospective trial. , 2001, Radiology.

[8]  D. March,et al.  Use of breast core biopsy in the United States: results of a national survey. , 1997, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  I Tocino,et al.  Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate. , 1999, Radiology.

[10]  K. Hopper,et al.  Stereotactic breast biopsy with a biopsy gun. , 1990, Radiology.

[11]  W. P. Evans,et al.  Percutaneous core biopsy of the breast: effect of operator experience and number of samples on diagnostic accuracy. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  F. Margolin Detecting early breast cancer. Experience in a community hospital , 1989, Cancer.

[13]  L. Liberman,et al.  US-guided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. , 1998, Radiology.

[14]  P. Dempsey,et al.  Needle-localization biopsy of the breast: impact of a selective core needle biopsy program on yield. , 1995, Radiology.

[15]  Needle choice for sonographically guided core biopsy. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  H. E. Reynolds,et al.  Core needle biopsy of challenging benign breast conditions: a comprehensive literature review. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  J. Meyer,et al.  Large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. , 1999, JAMA.

[18]  G. W. Eklund,et al.  Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. , 1994, Radiology.

[19]  G. Farr,et al.  Image-guided core-needle breast biopsy is an accurate technique to evaluate patients with nonpalpable imaging abnormalities. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[20]  A. Richardson,et al.  Large-needle core biopsy: nonmalignant breast abnormalities evaluated with surgical excision or repeat core biopsy. , 1998, Radiology.

[21]  F. Margolin,et al.  Microcystic Calcifications at Stereotactic Breast Biopsy , 1999, The breast journal.

[22]  L. Adler,et al.  Embolization for the treatment of adenomyosis. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  M. Guenin Full disclosure of breast biopsy options. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  R. J. Jackman,et al.  Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. , 1999, Radiology.

[25]  D. Ikeda,et al.  Compliance with recommended follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.