HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF SMALL MAMMALS AT TWO SPATIAL SCALES IN THE NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA

Abstract Effective management strategies require an understanding of the spatial scale at which fauna use their habitat. Toward this end, we sampled small mammals in the northern Sierra Nevada, California, over 2 years at 18 livetrapping grids among 5 forest types. Forest types were defined by overstory tree composition, and 19 microhabitat variables were measured at all trap stations. Forest type and year explained 93% of variation in abundance of North American deermice (Peromyscus maniculatus), whereas only 40% was explained by microhabitat and year. Similarly, variation in abundance of long-eared and shadow chipmunks (Neotamias quadrimaculatus and N. senex) was better explained by forest type and year (67%) than by microhabitat and year (30%). Red fir (Abies magnifica) forests supported more P. maniculatus and Neotamias species than mixed-conifer and pine–cedar forests, and more Neotamias species than mixed-fir forests. Five of 6 uncommon species were significantly associated with forest type; golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis), northern flying squirrels (Glaucomys sabrinus), and long-tailed and montane voles (Microtus longicaudus and M. montanus) were captured almost exclusively in red fir forests, whereas dusky-footed woodrats (Neotoma fuscipes) and California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) were found in pine–cedar, mixed-fir, and mixed-conifer forests. The first 2 axes of a canonical correspondence analysis on microhabitat variables explained 71% of variation in combined small mammal abundance. Microhabitat associations varied among species but were driven primarily by canopy openness, shrub cover, and shrub richness. Although much of the small mammal fauna appeared to select habitat at both spatial scales studied, canonical correspondence analysis using forest type as a covariate revealed that microhabitat explained much less variation in small mammal abundance than did forest type.

[1]  W. Zielinski,et al.  Relationship between food habits and activity patterns of pine martens , 1983 .

[2]  Jan Lepš,et al.  Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO , 2003 .

[3]  Dan Taylor,et al.  FIRE HISTORY OF A SEQUOIA-MIXED CONIFER FOREST' , 1979 .

[4]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  Plant Species Diversity in Natural and Managed Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1995 .

[5]  M. V. Price,et al.  On measuring microhabitat affinities with special reference to small mammals , 1984 .

[6]  B. Biswell,et al.  Northern Spotted Owls: Influence of Prey Base and Landscape Character , 1992 .

[7]  C. Harrington,et al.  Small mammals in young forests: implications for management for sustainability , 2001 .

[8]  J. R. Waters,et al.  Northern flying squirrel densities in fir forests of northeastern California , 1995 .

[9]  D. H. Knight,et al.  Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology , 1974 .

[10]  J. Battles,et al.  Forest Composition, Structure, and Change in an Old-Growth Mixed Conifer Forest in the Northern Sierra Nevada , 1998 .

[11]  P. R. Atsatt,et al.  Adaptation to oak and other fibrous, phenolic-rich foliage by a small mammal, Neotoma fuscipes , 1983, Oecologia.

[12]  J. Bowman,et al.  The spatial component of variation in small-mammal abundance measured at three scales , 2001 .

[13]  W. Klenner,et al.  Response of northwestern chipmunks (Tamias amoenus) to variable habitat structure in young lodgepole pine forest , 2000 .

[14]  D. Urban,et al.  MODELING THE EFFECTS OF FIRE MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVES ON SIERRA NEVADA MIXED‐CONIFER FORESTS , 2000 .

[15]  K. Martin,et al.  Small Mammal Habitat Associations at Patch and Landscape Scales in Oregon , 2002 .

[16]  D. Morris.  Patterns and scale of habitat use in two temperate-zone, small mammal faunas , 1984 .

[17]  W. Mccomb,et al.  Associations of forest-floor vertebrates with coarse woody debris in managed forests of Western Oregon , 2000 .

[18]  J. R. Waters,et al.  Abundances of Small Mammals in Fir Forests in Northeastern California , 1998 .

[19]  Herman H. Shugart,et al.  Microhabitats in a Forest-Floor Small Mammal Fauna , 1978 .

[20]  M. Morrison,et al.  Habitat use by small mammals on early-growth clear-cuttings in western Oregon , 1989 .

[21]  Bruce D. Patterson,et al.  Scale dependence and scale independence in habitat associations of small mammals in southern temperate rainforest , 1999 .

[22]  A. B. Carey,et al.  Small mammals in managed, naturally young, and old-growth forests. , 1995 .

[23]  J. Wiens.  Spatial Scaling in Ecology , 1989 .

[24]  D. S. Sullivan,et al.  SMALL MAMMALS AND STAND STRUCTURE IN YOUNG PINE, SEED-TREE, AND OLD-GROWTH FOREST, SOUTHWEST CANADA , 2000 .

[25]  M. Barbour,et al.  The Shasta red fir forest of California. , 1985 .

[26]  G. Adler.  Influence of habitat structure on demography of two rodent species in eastern Massachusetts , 1987 .

[27]  J. Lockwood,et al.  Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[28]  William J. McShea,et al.  PREDICTING PRESENCE AND ABUNDANCE OF A SMALL MAMMAL SPECIES: THE EFFECT OF SCALE AND RESOLUTION , 2000 .

[29]  B. Biswell,et al.  Ecological scale and forest development: squirrels, dietary fungi, and vascular plants in managed and unmanaged forests. , 1999 .

[30]  Robert W. Day,et al.  Comparisons of Treatments After an Analysis of Variance in Ecology , 1989 .

[31]  W. Edge,et al.  Small Mammal Survival and Downed Wood at Multiple Scales in Managed Forests , 2004 .

[32]  D. A. Sutton.  Problems of Taxonomy and Distribution in Four Species of Chipmunks , 1995 .

[33]  S. Demarais,et al.  Spatial Scale Dependence of Rodent Habitat Use , 1999 .

[34]  Lisa C. Bradley,et al.  Revised checklist of North American mammals north of Mexico , 1975 .

[35]  M. Barbour,et al.  Tree regeneration following clearcut logging in red fir forests of California. , 1998 .

[36]  R. Hemmes,et al.  Use of California bay foliage by wood rats for possible fumigation of nest-borne ectoparasites , 2002 .

[37]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Ecological Scale and Habitat Use , 1987 .

[38]  Brenda S. Horn,et al.  Small Mammal Populations and Food Selection in Relation to Timber Harvest Practices in the Western Cascade Mountains , 1983 .

[39]  Douglas H. Johnson.  THE COMPARISON OF USAGE AND AVAILABILITY MEASUREMENTS FOR EVALUATING RESOURCE PREFERENCE , 1980 .

[40]  P. Wood,et al.  Summer Microhabitat Selection by Foraging Allegheny Woodrats (Neotoma magister) in a Managed Forest , 2002 .

[41]  T. P. Sullivan,et al.  Relations of Small Mammal Populations to Even-Aged Shelterwood Systems in Sub-Boreal Spruce Forest , 1998 .

[42]  Gordon L. Kirkland,et al.  Guidelines for the Capture, Handling, and Care of Mammals as Approved by the American Society of Mammalogists , 1998 .

[43]  T. Lawlor.  Mammal Community Dynamics: Faunal composition and distribution of mammals in western coniferous forests , 2003 .

[44]  A. B. Carey.  SCIURIDS IN PACIFIC NORTHWEST MANAGED AND OLD-GROWTH FORESTS' , 1995 .

[45]  S. B. Wall,et al.  SCATTER-HOARDING BEHAVIOR OF DEER MICE ( PEROMYSCUS MANICULATUS) , 2001 .

[46]  J. Ferron,et al.  Short-term use of different residual forest structures by three sciurid species in a clear-cut boreal landscape , 2001 .

[47]  John A. Bissonette,et al.  The Influence of Spatial Scale and Scale-Sensitive Properties on Habitat Selection by American Marten , 1997 .

[48]  B. Noon,et al.  Dusky-footed woodrat abundance in different-aged forests in northwestern California , 1993 .

[49]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Macrohabitat and Microhabitat Affinities of Small Mammals in a Fragmented Landscape on the Upper Coastal Plain of Virginia , 2001 .

[50]  D. Rizzo,et al.  Present and past old-growth forests of the Lake Tahoe Basin, Sierra Nevada, US , 2002 .

[51]  C. Maser,et al.  Interactions among squirrels, mycorrhizal fungi, and coniferous forests in Oregon , 1988 .

[52]  S. Pyare,et al.  PATTERNS OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL-FUNGI CONSUMPTION BY SMALL MAMMALS IN REMNANT OLD-GROWTH FORESTS OF THE SIERRA NEVADA , 2001 .

[53]  Charles B. Halpern,et al.  The structure and dynamics of Abies magnifica forests in the southern Cascade Range, USA , 1991 .

[54]  M. Palmer.  PUTTING THINGS IN EVEN BETTER ORDER: THE ADVANTAGES OF CANONICAL CORRESPONDENCE ANALYSIS' , 1993 .

[55]  S. B. Wall.  Cache site selection by chipmunks (Tamias spp.) and its influence on the effectiveness of seed dispersal in Jeffrey pine (Pinus jeffreyi) , 1993, Oecologia.

[56]  Julian D Olden,et al.  Toward a Mechanistic Understanding and Prediction of Biotic Homogenization , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[57]  J. R. Waters,et al.  Mammal Community Dynamics: Ecology and conservation of arboreal rodents of western coniferous forests , 2003 .

[58]  D. Kelt,et al.  Quantitative Habitat Associations of Small Mammals in a Temperate Rainforest in Southern Chile: Empirical Patterns and the Importance of Ecological Scale , 1994 .

[59]  Ter Braak,et al.  Canoco reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user''s guide: software for canonical community ord , 2002 .

[60]  E. Jorgensen.  SMALL MAMMAL USE OF MICROHABITAT REVIEWED , 2004 .

[61]  Distribution and abundance of Neotoma in western Oregon and Washington , 1999 .

[62]  R. Wagner,et al.  Clearcutting and burning of northern spruce‐fir forests: implications for small mammal communities , 1999 .

[63]  J. Linsdale,et al.  The Dusky-Footed Wood Rat , 1952 .

[64]  J. W. Wagtendonk,et al.  An Overview of Fire in the Sierra Nevada , 1996 .

[65]  D. Beesley.  Reconstructing the landscape: an environmental history, 1820-1960 , 1996 .

[66]  W R.,et al.  Comparisons of Treatments After an Analysis of Variance in Ecology , 2007 .