Matrix induced autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee: Comparison between osteochondritis dissecans and osteonecrosis and effect of chondrocyte thickness on prognosis.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was compare the clinical success of treatments for avascular necrosis and osteochondritis dissecans in cases who underwent matrix autologous chondrocyte implantations, and evaluate cartilage thickness on the clinical outcomes after implantation. METHODS A total of 37 patients (29 men, and 8 women; mean age: 23.8 years (16-38)) were treated prospectively with a two-stage matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation (avascular necrosis, n=21; osteochondritis dissecans, n=18). Clinical improvements and follows-up were assessed based on the patients' International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) scores with simultaneous cartilage thickness measurement using short-TI inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging. The patients were divided into four subgroups based on their clinical scores, as group D <65 points, Group C 65-83 points, Group B 84-90 and Group A ≥90. RESULTS The mean ICRS score was 28.33±7.14 in the preoperative period in the avascular necrosis group, which increased to 70.88±12.61 at 60 months; while the mean ICRS score increased from 29.75±7.15 preoperatively to 87.58±12.83 at 60 months in the osteochondritis dissecans group. A statistically significant difference in the ICRS scores was noted between the two groups, and also between the ICRS scores and cartilage thicknesses of the subgroups (p<0.05). CONCLUSION Our study results revealed that greater clinical improvement was achieved in patients with osteochondritis dissecans undergoing matrix autologous chondrocyte implantation than in those with avascular necrosis. In addition, cartilage thickness greater than 3.7 mm following an autologous chondrocyte transplantation showed excellent clinical improvement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, Therapeutic Study.

[1]  Xiaojuan Li,et al.  Longitudinal analysis of T1ρ and T2 quantitative MRI of knee cartilage laminar organization following microfracture surgery. , 2012, The Knee.

[2]  T. Ackland,et al.  Arthroscopic matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation: 2-year outcomes. , 2012, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[3]  D. Samartzis,et al.  Effectiveness of autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review of controlled trials. , 2010, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[4]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Treatment of Symptomatic Cartilage Defects of the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  S Trattnig,et al.  Multimodal approach in the use of clinical scoring, morphological MRI and biochemical T2-mapping and diffusion-weighted imaging in their ability to assess differences between cartilage repair tissue after microfracture therapy and matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation: a pilot stu , 2009, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[6]  K. Scheffler,et al.  Magnetization transfer contrast and T2 mapping in the evaluation of cartilage repair tissue with 3T MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[7]  Wilhelm Horger,et al.  Quantitative T2 Mapping of Matrix-Associated Autologous Chondrocyte Transplantation at 3 Tesla: An In Vivo Cross-Sectional Study , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[8]  T. Sasho,et al.  Evaluation of reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans: histology, biochemistry, and MR imaging , 2007, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[9]  J S Jurvelin,et al.  Evaluation of cartilage repair in the distal femur after autologous chondrocyte transplantation using T2 relaxation time and dGEMRIC. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  Jiake Xu,et al.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): biological and histological assessment. , 2007, Tissue engineering.

[11]  George Tomlinson,et al.  Cartilage T2 assessment: differentiation of normal hyaline cartilage and reparative tissue after arthroscopic cartilage repair in equine subjects. , 2006, Radiology.

[12]  Herwig Imhof,et al.  Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. , 2004, European journal of radiology.

[13]  Lars Engebretsen,et al.  Articular Cartilage Lesions in 993 Consecutive Knee Arthroscopies , 2004, The American journal of sports medicine.

[14]  Bert R. Mandelbaum,et al.  Articular Cartilage Lesions of the Knee , 1998, The American journal of sports medicine.

[15]  H. Mankin,et al.  The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. , 1982, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.