Two different methods to correct the initial conditions applied to the storm of 27 December 1999 over southern France

In strong baroclinic flows, small errors in the initial conditions may grow rapidly and lead to large forecast errors even at very short ranges. It is therefore of crucial importance that these initial conditions are determined carefully. In this paper we use two different but complementary methods to improve the operational analysis of a storm that caused loss of life and much material damage in France on 27 December 1999. The first method is based on the adjoint technique: an adjoint model-run provides the sensitivity of one aspect of the forecast (the cost function) to the initial conditions. We then apply a correction whose shape is the sensitivity so that the corrected initial state better fits the observations. The second method is based on the Quasi-Geostrophic Potential Vorticity (QGPV) inversion. A misfit between the model analysis and satellite pictures (water vapour Meteosat images, for example) leads to the subjective modification of some of the features of the potential vorticity field. The analysis is modified using the wind and temperature corrections provided by the inversion of the QGPV correction. Both methods significantly improve the forecast and may provide valuable guidance for forecasters in real time. Copyright © 2004 Royal Meteorological Society.

[1]  S. Petterssen.  a General Survey of Factors Influencing Development at Sea Level. , 1955 .

[2]  F. Ayrault,et al.  North Atlantic ultra high frequency variability , 1995 .

[3]  Francisco Martín,et al.  Use of potential vorticity fields, Meteosat water vapour imagery and pseudo water vapour images for evaluating numerical model behaviour , 2001 .

[4]  F. Kucharski,et al.  Upper‐level barotropic growth as a precursor to cyclogenesis during FASTEX , 2000 .

[5]  Jean-Noël Thépaut,et al.  Combined use of sensitivity information and observations to improve meteorological forecasts: A feasibility study applied to the 'Christmas storm' case , 2000 .

[6]  J. Schmetz,et al.  Estimation of the Upper Tropospheric Relative Humidity Field from METFOSAT Water Vapor Image Data , 1988 .

[7]  Z. Pu,et al.  Using forecast sensitivity patterns to improve future forecast skill , 1997 .

[8]  Ronald Gelaro,et al.  Relationship between singular vectors and transient features in the background flow , 2001 .

[9]  F. Molteni,et al.  The ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System: Methodology and validation , 1996 .

[10]  H. Davies,et al.  Misforecasts of Synoptic Systems: Diagnosis via PV Retrodiction , 1997 .

[11]  Meral Demirtas,et al.  Sensitivity of Short-Range Weather Forecasts to Local Potential Vorticity Modifications , 1999 .

[12]  Roberto Buizza,et al.  The Singular-Vector Structure of the Atmospheric Global Circulation , 1995 .

[13]  A. Chédin,et al.  Depiction of upper-level precursors of the December 1999 storms from TOVS observations , 2003 .

[14]  Da‐Lin Zhang,et al.  An Application of Potential Vorticity Inversion to Improving the Numerical Prediction of the March 1993 Superstorm , 1998 .

[15]  S. Petterssen,et al.  On the development of extratropical cyclones , 1971 .

[16]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Sensitivity of forecast errors to initial conditions , 1996 .