Interfunctional conflict, conflict resolution styles, and new product success: a four-culture comparison

This paper develops a model relating innovation success to the level of interfunctional conflict and conflict resolution methods. The model suggests a concave relationship between performance and the level of interfunctional conflict among marketing, R&D, and manufacturing. It also conjectures that both national culture and the level of interfunctional conflict influence the effectiveness of different conflict resolution methods. An empirical test of the proposed framework involves a survey of 968 marketing managers from Japan, Hong Kong, the United States, and Great Britain. The results provide general support for the model's predictions and reveal several significant cross-national differences.

[1]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[2]  L. Pondy.  Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. , 1967 .

[3]  D. Wilemon,et al.  Diagnosing conflict determinants in project management , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[4]  R. Kilmann,et al.  Comparison of Four Instruments Measuring Conflict Behavior , 1978 .

[5]  Richard W. Cheston,et al.  Conflict Resolution: What Works? , 1979 .

[6]  L. Bourgeois.  Performance and consensus , 1980 .

[7]  W. Souder.  Disharmony between R&D and marketing , 1981 .

[8]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing the Innovating Organization , 1982 .

[9]  R. Lewicki,et al.  Managing conflict at organizational interfaces , 1982 .

[10]  M. Rahim,et al.  A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. , 1983, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[11]  L. Bourgeois.  STRATEGIC GOALS, PERCEIVED UNCERTAINTY, AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE IN VOLATILE ENVIRONMENTS , 1985 .

[12]  E. Lind,et al.  Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. , 1986 .

[13]  Linda L. Putnam,et al.  Conflict and negotiation. , 1987 .

[14]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Marketing's Interaction with Other Functional Units: A Conceptual Framework and Empirical Evidence , 1987 .

[15]  Robert W. Ruekert,et al.  Interactions between marketing and R&D departments in implementing different business strategies , 1987 .

[16]  Kwok Leung,et al.  Some Determinants of Conflict Avoidance , 1988 .

[17]  I. Vertinsky,et al.  Does Culture Matter? A Cross-Cultural Study of Executives’ Choice, Decisiveness, and Risk Adjustment in International Marketing , 1988 .

[18]  R. Baron.  Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior pattern and self-monitoring☆ , 1989 .

[19]  H. Triandis.  Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. , 1989, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[20]  J. Jaccard,et al.  Interaction effects in multiple regression , 1992 .

[21]  Robert A. Baron,et al.  Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective , 1991 .

[22]  Stella Ting-Toomey,et al.  CULTURE, FACE MAINTENANCE, AND STYLES OF HANDLING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICT: A STUDY IN FIVE CULTURES , 1991 .

[23]  D. Dougherty.  Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms , 1992 .

[24]  A. Griffin,et al.  Patterns of Communication Among Marketing, Engineering and Manufacturing-A Comparison Between Two New Product Teams , 1992 .

[25]  K. Thomas.  Conflict and negotiation processes in organizations. , 1992 .

[26]  Charles R. Schwenk,et al.  Effects of Consensus and Devill's Advocacy On Strategic Decision‐Making , 1993 .

[27]  Abbie Griffin,et al.  The Voice of the Customer , 1993 .

[28]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  Determinants of R&D—marketing integration in high-tech Japanese firms , 1993 .

[29]  M. Parry,et al.  R&D-marketing integration in Japanese high-technology firms: Hypotheses and empirical evidence , 1993 .

[30]  Victoria L. Crittenden,et al.  Reducing conflict between marketing and manufacturing , 1993 .

[31]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  Effects of Devil′s Advocacy and Dialectical Inquiry on Individuals versus Groups , 1994 .

[32]  Geert Hofstede,et al.  Management scientists are human , 1994 .

[33]  Linda L. Putnam.  PRODUCTIVE CONFLICT: NEGOTIATION AS IMPLICIT COORDINATION , 1994 .

[34]  J. Norton,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: a comparison of practices in the Japanese and American chemical industries , 1994 .

[35]  Yair Aharoni,et al.  Is Management Science International: In Search of Universal Rules , 1994 .

[36]  C. Fiol.  Consensus, diversity, and learning in organizations. , 1994 .

[37]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[38]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[39]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. , 1995 .

[40]  K. Sivakumar,et al.  National Culture and New Product Development: An Integrative Review , 1996 .

[41]  Mark E. Parry,et al.  What separates Japanese new product winners from losers , 1996 .

[42]  L. H. Pelled.  Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory , 1996 .

[43]  J. Hauser,et al.  Integrating R&D and marketing: A review and analysis of the literature , 1996 .

[44]  M. Parry,et al.  A Cross-National Comparative Study of New Product Development Processes: Japan and the United States , 1997 .

[45]  M. Parry,et al.  The Determinants of Japanese New Product Successes , 1997 .

[46]  X. Song,et al.  The Impact of Strategy on Conflict: A Cross- National Comparative Study of U.S. and Japanese firms , 1997 .

[47]  Jinhong Xie,et al.  The Impact of Cross‐Functional Joint Involvement Across Product Development Stages: An Exploratory Study , 1998 .