Catalytic and Non-catalytic Supercritical Water Gasification of Microalgae and Glycerol

In this study, we present the gasification of microalgae (Chlorella vulgaris) and glycerol in supercritical water (SCW) using batch (quartz capillaries) and continuous flow reactors. Preliminary tests of algae gasification were done with quartz capillaries at varying operating conditions such as temperature (400−700 °C), reaction time (1−15 min), and the addition of catalysts. The dry gas composition of uncatalyzed gasification of algae in SCW mainly comprised of CO2, CO, CH4, H2, and some C2−C3 compounds. Higher temperatures, low algae concentrations, and longer residence times favored the algae gasification efficiency (GE). The addition of catalysts to the capillaries resulted in higher yields of hydrogen and lower CO yields via enhanced water−gas shift activity. The addition of catalysts accelerated the gasification efficiency up to a maximum of 84% at 600 °C and 2 min reaction time with nickel-based catalysts. Complete gasification is achieved at higher temperatures (700 °C) and with excess amounts of (Ru/TiO2) catalyst. To elucidate part of the difficulties related to the SCWG of algae, reforming of a model compound (here glycerol) in SCW was carried out in a continuous flow reactor in the presence of additives like amino acids (l-alanine, glycine, and l-proline) and alkali salt (K2CO3) and combinations thereof. The amino acids l-alanine and glycine have a minor effect on the gasification process of glycerol, and a significant reduction of the gasification efficiency was observed in the presence of l-proline. Coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent were more noticeable with glycerol−amino acid mixtures. In the absence of amino acids, the glycerol solution gasified without any coke formation and colorization of the reactor effluent. Again this effect was more pronounced in the presence of l-proline. The addition of K2CO3 enhanced the glycerol gasification efficiency and increased the hydrogen yields promoting the water−gas shift reaction.

[1]  S. Kaul,et al.  Free radical scavenging potential of L-proline: evidence from in vitro assays , 2008, Amino Acids.

[2]  E. Dinjus,et al.  Ionic reactions and pyrolysis of glycerol as competing reaction pathways in near- and supercritical water , 2002 .

[3]  M. Kluth,et al.  Hydrothermal gasification of biomass and organic wastes , 2000 .

[4]  W.P.M. van Swaaij,et al.  Hydrothermal Conversion of Biomass: I, Glucose Conversion in Hot Compressed Water , 2009 .

[5]  P. Savage,et al.  Supercritical Water Gasification of Phenol and Glycine as Models for Plant and Protein Biomass , 2008 .

[6]  R. Evans,et al.  A comparison of the Maillard reactivity of proline to other amino acids using pyrolysis-molecular beam mass spectrometry , 2004 .

[7]  G. Soave.  Equilibrium constants from a modified Redlich-Kwong equation of state , 1972 .

[8]  K. Maniatis,et al.  Gasification of biomass in supercritical water , 2002 .

[9]  Frédéric Vogel,et al.  SunCHem: an integrated process for the hydrothermal production of methane from microalgae and CO2 mitigation , 2009, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[10]  M. Barolo,et al.  Estimation of high-pressure fugacity coefficients of pure gaseous fluids by a modified SRK equation of state , 1993 .

[11]  Wolter Prins,et al.  Gasification of Model Compounds and Wood in Hot Compressed Water , 2006 .

[12]  A. Kruse.  Hydrothermal biomass gasification , 2009 .

[13]  Frédéric Vogel,et al.  Catalytic gasification of algae in supercritical water for biofuel production and carbon capture , 2009 .

[14]  Andrea Kruse,et al.  Influence of Proteins on the Hydrothermal Gasification and Liquefaction of Biomass. 2. Model Compounds , 2007 .

[15]  Y. Chisti.  Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[16]  W. V. Swaaij,et al.  Catalytic gasification of dry and wet biomass , 2009 .

[17]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Thermodynamic modeling and analysis of biomass gasification for hydrogen production in supercritical water , 2007 .

[18]  Herbert Vogel,et al.  Hydrothermal reactions of alanine and glycine in sub- and supercritical water , 2007 .

[19]  R. J. Divilio,et al.  Biomass gasification in supercritical water , 2000 .

[20]  Koichi Fujie,et al.  Reaction Kinetics of Amino Acid Decomposition in High-Temperature and High-Pressure Water , 2004 .

[21]  M. Barolo,et al.  Estimation of Chemical Equilibria in High-Pressure Gaseous Systems by a Modified Redlich-Kwong-Soave Equation of State , 1995 .

[22]  A. Kruse,et al.  Char and Coke Formation as Unwanted Side Reaction of the Hydrothermal Biomass Gasification , 2008 .

[23]  Andrea Kruse,et al.  Supercritical water gasification , 2008 .

[24]  W.P.M. van Swaaij,et al.  A high-throughput screening technique for conversion in hot compressed water , 2004 .

[25]  D. Meier,et al.  High-Throughput Screening Technique for Conversion in Hot Compressed Water: Quantification and Characterization of Liquid and Solid Products , 2007 .

[26]  P. Savage,et al.  Noncatalytic Gasification of Lignin in Supercritical Water , 2008 .

[27]  B. G. Kyle,et al.  Chemical and process thermodynamics , 1984 .

[28]  Morgan Fröling,et al.  Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub- and supercritical water technologies , 2008 .

[29]  T. Minowa,et al.  A novel microalgal system for energy production with nitrogen cycling , 1999 .

[30]  V. Sricharoenchaikul,et al.  Assessment of black liquor gasification in supercritical water. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[31]  J. Benemann,et al.  Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy's Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae; Close-Out Report , 1998 .

[32]  Tomoaki Minowa,et al.  Biomass gasification in near- and super-critical water: Status and prospects , 2005 .

[33]  Juan Carlos Serrano-Ruiz,et al.  Catalytic Conversion of Biomass to Monofunctional Hydrocarbons and Targeted Liquid-Fuel Classes , 2008, Science.

[34]  W. Mok,et al.  HYDROGEN PRODUCTION BY GASIFICATION OF GLUCOSE AND WET BIOMASS IN SUPERCRITICAL WATER , 1990 .