A Comparison of Learner Intent and Behaviour in Live and Archived MOOCs.

The advent of massive open online courses (MOOCs) has created opportunities for learning that are clearly in high demand, but the direction in which MOOCs should evolve to best meet the interests and needs of learners is less apparent. Motivated by our interest in whether there are potential and purpose for archived MOOCs to be used as learning resources beyond and between instructor-led live-sessions, we examined the use of a statistics MOOC and a computer science MOOC, both of which were made available as archived-courses after a live-session and for which enrolment continued to grow while archived. Using data collected from surveys of learner demographics and intent, the course database of major learner activity, and the detailed clickstream of all learner actions, we compared the demographics, intent, and behaviour of live- and archived-learners. We found that archived-learners were interested in the live-MOOC and that their patterns of use of course materials, such as the number and sequence of videos they watched, the number of assessments they completed, their demonstration of self-regulatory behaviour, and their rate of participation in the discussion forums, were similar to the live-learners. In addition, we found evidence of learners drawing on an archived-MOOC for use as reference material. Anticipated areas of impact of this work include implications for the future development of MOOCs as resources for self-study and professional development, and in support of learner success in other courses.

[1]  Terry Anderson,et al.  E-Learning in the 21st Century: A Community of Inquiry Framework for Research and Practice , 2016 .

[2]  Avner Caspi,et al.  Comparing Perceived Formal and Informal Learning in Face-to-Face versus Online Environments , 2010 .

[3]  Erik Skramstad,et al.  Teaching Presence and Communication Timeliness in Asynchronous Online Courses. , 2012 .

[4]  Traci Sitzmann,et al.  The Influence of Goal Orientation Dimensions on Time to Train in a Self-Paced Training Environment , 2009 .

[5]  P. Pintrich.  The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. , 2000 .

[6]  Richard A. Schwier,et al.  Participant Engagement in a Non-Formal, Self-Directed and Blended Learning Environment , 2009 .

[7]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[8]  Sukon Kanchanaraksa,et al.  Massive Open Online Courses in Public Health , 2013, Front. Public Health.

[9]  Jason Rhode,et al.  Interaction Equivalency in Self-Paced Online Learning Environments: An Exploration of Learner Preferences , 2009 .

[10]  P. Pintrich,et al.  Handbook of self-regulation , 2000 .

[11]  Min Liu,et al.  Understanding MOOCs as an Emerging Online Learning Tool: Perspectives From the Students , 2013 .

[12]  J. Dobrovolny.  How Adults Learn from Self‐Paced, Technology‐Based Corporate Training: New focus for learners, new focus for designers , 2006 .

[13]  Bridget D. Arend,et al.  The importance of course design, feedback, and facilitation: student perceptions of the relationship between teaching presence and cognitive presence , 2012 .

[14]  Patrick R. Lowenthal,et al.  Context Matters: A Description and Typology of the Online Learning Landscape , 2009 .

[15]  Panagiotis Adamopoulos,et al.  What makes a great MOOC? An interdisciplinary analysis of student retention in online courses , 2013, ICIS.

[16]  Yoav Bergner,et al.  Who does what in a massive open online course? , 2014, Commun. ACM.

[17]  David E. Pritchard,et al.  Studying Learning in the Worldwide Classroom Research into edX's First MOOC. , 2013 .

[18]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[19]  Girish Balakrishnan,et al.  Predicting Student Retention in Massive Open Online Courses using Hidden Markov Models , 2013 .

[20]  Toru Iiyoshi,et al.  Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge , 2008 .

[21]  Terry Anderson,et al.  Self Paced Learners Meet Social Software: An Exploration of Learners’ Attitudes, Expectations and Experience , 2010 .

[22]  Douglas H. Fisher,et al.  Wrapping a MOOC: Student Perceptions of an Experiment in Blended Learning , 2013 .

[23]  B. Zimmerman.  Investigating Self-Regulation and Motivation: Historical Background, Methodological Developments, and Future Prospects , 2008, American Educational Research Journal.

[24]  Thomas M. Duffy,et al.  Online learning: Learner characteristics and their approaches to managing learning , 2009 .

[25]  Andrew D. Ho,et al.  Changing “Course” , 2014 .

[26]  T. Anderson.  Getting the Mix Right Again: An Updated and Theoretical Rationale for Interaction , 2003 .

[27]  K.C. Sheridan,et al.  The Indicators of Instructor Presence that are Important to Students in Online Courses Los Indicadores de la Presencia del Instructor Que son Importantes para los Alumnos de Cursos Online , 2010 .

[28]  Betty Collis,et al.  E-learning by design , 2004 .