Temporal feature estimation during walking using miniature accelerometers: an analysis of gait improvement after hip arthroplasty

A new method for the detection of gait cycle phases using only two miniature accelerometers together with a light, portable digital recorder is proposed. Each subject is asked to walk on a walkway at his/her own preferred speed. Gait analysis was performed using an original method of computing the values of temporal parameters from accelerometer signals. First, to validate the accelerometric method, measurements are taken on a group of healthy subjects. No significant differences are observed between the results thus obtained and those from pressure sensors attached under the foot. Then, measurements using only accelerometers are performed on a group of 12 patients with unilateral hip osteo-arthritis. The gait analysis is carried out just before hip arthroplasty and again, three, six and nine months afterwards. A mean decrease of 88% of asymmetry of stance time and especially a mean decrease of 250% of asymmetry of double support time are observed, nine months after the operation. These results confirm the validity of the proposed method for healthy subjects and its efficiency for functional evaluation of gait improvement after arthroplasty.

[1]  G. Andersson,et al.  Hip assessment: a comparison of nine different methods. , 1972, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[2]  L Klenerman,et al.  Gait analysis in the assessment of functional performance before and after total hip replacement. , 1981, Journal of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Giancarlo Ferrigno,et al.  Elite: A Digital Dedicated Hardware System for Movement Analysis Via Real-Time TV Signal Processing , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[4]  D Graupe,et al.  A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation. , 1987, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[5]  M. Liang,et al.  Comparisons of Five Health Status Instruments for Orthopedic Evaluation , 1990, Medical care.

[6]  G. Harris,et al.  Foot pressure distribution during walking and shuffling. , 1991, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  B H Jones,et al.  Ambulatory foot contact monitor to estimate metabolic cost of human locomotion. , 1994, Journal of applied physiology.

[8]  K. Aminian,et al.  Estimation of speed and incline of walking using neural network , 1994, Conference Proceedings. 10th Anniversary. IMTC/94. Advanced Technologies in I & M. 1994 IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technolgy Conference (Cat. No.94CH3424-9).

[9]  K Aminian,et al.  Incline, speed, and distance assessment during unconstrained walking. , 1995, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  P Shekelle,et al.  Differences between Patients' and Physicians' Evaluations of Outcome after Total Hip Arthroplasty* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[11]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Gait Changes in Older Adults: Predictors of Falls or Indicators of Fear? , 1997, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[12]  R. Whalen,et al.  Prediction of human gait parameters from temporal measures of foot-ground contact. , 1997, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[13]  Z O Abu-Faraj,et al.  A Holter-type, microprocessor-based, rehabilitation instrument for acquisition and storage of plantar pressure data. , 1997, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[14]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  Motion Analysis in Clinical Practice Using Ambulatory Accelerometry , 1998, CAPTECH.

[15]  V. Macellari,et al.  Multistep pressure platform as a stand-alone system for gait assessment , 1996, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[16]  A. L. Evans,et al.  Recording accelerations in body movements , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[17]  S. Hirokawa,et al.  Gait analysis using a measuring walkway for temporal and distance factors , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.