Simple Neural Networks that Optimize Decisions

We review simple connectionist and firing rate models for mutually inhibiting pools of neurons that discriminate between pairs of stimuli. Both are two-dimensional nonlinear stochastic ordinary differential equations, and although they differ in how inputs and stimuli enter, we show that they are equivalent under state variable and parameter coordinate changes. A key parameter is gain: the maximum slope of the sigmoidal activation function. We develop piecewise-linear and purely linear models, and one-dimensional reductions to Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes that can be viewed as linear filters, and show that reaction time and error rate statistics are well approximated by these simpler models. We then pose and solve the optimal gain problem for the Ornstein–Uhlenbeck processes, finding explicit gain schedules that minimize error rates for time-varying stimuli. We relate these to time courses of norepinephrine release in cortical areas, and argue that transient firing rate changes in the brainstem nucleus locus coeruleus may be responsible for approximate gain optimization.

[1]  D. Wilkin,et al.  Neuron , 2001, Brain Research.

[2]  L Sirovich,et al.  A population approach to cortical dynamics with an application to orientation tuning , 2000, Network.

[3]  Adrienne L. Fairhall,et al.  Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code , 2001, Nature.

[4]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. , 2006, Psychological review.

[5]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Mechanisms underlying dependencies of performance on stimulus history in a two-alternative forced-choice task , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[6]  Petra Boxler How to construct stochastic center manifolds on the level of vector fields , 1991 .

[7]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  The locus coeruleus , adaptive gain , and the optimization of simple decision tasks , 2004 .

[8]  Kurt Wiesenfeld,et al.  Bifurcations in fluctuating systems: The center-manifold approach , 1983 .

[9]  J. Andel Sequential Analysis , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[11]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  David McLaughlin,et al.  Coarse-Grained Reduction and Analysis of a Network Model of Cortical Response: I. Drifting Grating Stimuli , 2002, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[13]  William Bialek,et al.  Reading a Neural Code , 1991, NIPS.

[14]  James L. McClelland On the time relations of mental processes: An examination of systems of processes in cascade. , 1979 .

[15]  E. Lehmann Testing Statistical Hypotheses , 1960 .

[16]  G. Aston-Jones,et al.  Locus coeruleus neurons in monkey are selectively activated by attended cues in a vigilance task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  P. Holmes,et al.  MODELING A SIMPLE CHOICE TASK: STOCHASTIC DYNAMICS OF MUTUALLY INHIBITORY NEURAL GROUPS , 2001 .

[18]  Christof Koch,et al.  Adaptive Neural Coding Dependent on the Time-Varying Statistics of the Somatic Input Current , 1999, Neural Computation.

[19]  B. Øksendal Stochastic Differential Equations , 1985 .

[20]  W. Newsome,et al.  Neural basis of a perceptual decision in the parietal cortex (area LIP) of the rhesus monkey. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  R.N. Bracewell,et al.  Signal analysis , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[22]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A parallel distributed processing approach to automaticity. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  Anders Krogh,et al.  Introduction to the theory of neural computation , 1994, The advanced book program.

[24]  Jean,et al.  The Computer and the Brain , 1989, Annals of the History of Computing.

[25]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The time course of perceptual choice: the leaky, competing accumulator model. , 2001, Psychological review.

[26]  J. Cohen,et al.  The role of locus coeruleus in the regulation of cognitive performance. , 1999, Science.

[27]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  A Theory of Memory Retrieval. , 1978 .

[28]  M. Stone Models for choice-reaction time , 1960 .

[29]  V. Araújo Random Dynamical Systems , 2006, math/0608162.

[30]  J D Cohen,et al.  A network model of catecholamine effects: gain, signal-to-noise ratio, and behavior. , 1990, Science.

[31]  P. Holmes,et al.  Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields , 1983, Applied Mathematical Sciences.

[32]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[33]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Simplified dynamics in a model of noradrenergic modulation of cognitive performance , 2002, Neural Networks.

[34]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  Psychology and neurobiology of simple decisions , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[36]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[37]  Donald J. Woodward,et al.  Phasic activation of the locus coeruleus enhances responses of primary sensory cortical neurons to peripheral receptive field stimulation , 1998, Brain Research.

[38]  K. H. Britten,et al.  Responses of neurons in macaque MT to stochastic motion signals , 1993, Visual Neuroscience.

[39]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Progress in the use of interactive models for understanding attention and performance , 1994 .

[40]  M. Shadlen,et al.  Response of Neurons in the Lateral Intraparietal Area during a Combined Visual Discrimination Reaction Time Task , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Amit,et al.  Quantitative study of attractor neural networks retrieving at low spike rates: II. Low-rate retrieval in symmetric networks , 1991 .

[42]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[43]  Bard Ermentrout,et al.  Reduction of Conductance-Based Models with Slow Synapses to Neural Nets , 1994, Neural Computation.

[44]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  Spiking Neuron Models , 2002 .

[45]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Effects of synaptic noise and filtering on the frequency response of spiking neurons. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[46]  Daniel J. Amit,et al.  Quantitative Study of Attractor Neural Network Retrieving at Low Spike Rates: I , 1991 .

[47]  F. AbbottPhysics FIRING-RATE MODELS FOR NEURAL POPULATIONSL , 1991 .

[48]  S. Shreve,et al.  Stochastic differential equations , 1955, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[49]  Wayne A. Wickelgren,et al.  Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics , 1977 .

[50]  Philip Holmes,et al.  The Influence of Spike Rate and Stimulus Duration on Noradrenergic Neurons , 2004, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[51]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Connectionist and diffusion models of reaction time. , 1999, Psychological review.

[52]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures , 1988, Neural Networks.

[53]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[54]  Michael L. Platt,et al.  Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex , 1999, Nature.

[55]  John R. Anderson The Adaptive Character of Thought , 1990 .

[56]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[57]  J. Gold,et al.  Banburismus and the Brain Decoding the Relationship between Sensory Stimuli, Decisions, and Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[58]  Frances S. Chance,et al.  Gain Modulation from Background Synaptic Input , 2002, Neuron.

[59]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and Control of Action by the Frontal Lobes , 2002, Neuron.