Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural Model

Residents in the State of Nevada hold strong opinions about the federal government`s proposal to site the nation`s first high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain. The model developed in this study is designed to examine the relationship between public perceptions of risk, trust in risk management, and potential economic impacts of the current repository program using a confirmatory multivariate method known as covariance structure analysis. The data used to test the model was collected in a 1989 statewide survey of Nevada residents. The results indicate that, for a statewide sample, perceptions of potential economic benefits do not have a significant role in predicting support or opposition to the repository program. On the other hand, risk perceptions and the level of trust in repository management are closely related to each other and to positions on Yucca Mountain. Trust directly influences risk perceptions which, in turn, have a direct effect on the attitude toward the repository, and an indirect effect through perceived stigma effects. 45 refs., 2 figs., 5 tabs.

[1]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived Risk, Trust, and the Politics of Nuclear Waste , 1991, Science.

[2]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  James Flynn,et al.  Risk Perception, Trust, and Nuclear Waste: Lessons from Yucca Mountain , 1991 .

[4]  P. Slovic,et al.  Yucca Mountain Socioeconomic Project: The 1991 Nevada State telephone survey: Key findings , 1991 .

[5]  R Kemp,et al.  Why Not in My Backyard? A Radical Interpretation of Public Opposition to the Deep Disposal of Radioactive Waste in the United Kingdom , 1990 .

[6]  A. Titus.  Bullfrog County: A Nevada Response to Federal Nuclear-Waste Disposal Policy , 1990 .

[7]  Joseph G. Morone,et al.  The Demise of Nuclear Energy?: Lessons for Democratic Control of Technology , 1989 .

[8]  Michael R. Edelstein,et al.  Contaminated Communities: The Social And Psychological Impacts Of Residential Toxic Exposure , 1989 .

[9]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  EQS : structural equations program manual , 1989 .

[10]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Nevada's Predicament Public Perceptions of Risk from the Proposed Nuclear Waste Repository , 1988 .

[11]  John L. Campbell,et al.  Collapse of an Industry: Nuclear Power and the Contradictions of U.S. Policy. , 1988 .

[12]  William Samuelson,et al.  Status quo bias in decision making , 1988 .

[13]  David A. Bella,et al.  Technocracy and trust: nuclear waste controversy , 1988 .

[14]  David A. Bella,et al.  Establishing Trust: Nuclear Waste Disposal , 1988 .

[15]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[16]  S. Rayner,et al.  How Fair Is Safe Enough? The Cultural Approach to Societal Technology Choice1 , 1987 .

[17]  C. Fornell.  A Second generation of multivariate analysis : classification of methods and implications for marketing research , 1985 .

[18]  P. Bentler.  MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS WITH LATENT VARIABLES: CAUSAL MODELING , 1980 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .