An Efficiency Comparison of Regional Employment Offices Operating under Different Exogenous Conditions

SummaryThis paper investigates the technical efficiency differences of a sample of regional employment offices (REOs) across Swiss cantons. Regular job-search assistance, registration and matching of unemployed workers with job vacancies performed by employment offices are all important active labour market policies (ALMPs) which are often ignored in the literature evaluating the impact of active measures. The analysis is carried out by means of a stochastic production frontier model estimated on a panel of employment offices observed over the period between November 2000 and December 2001. The results show that the specific exogenous conditions exercise influence over the technical efficiency of each employment office. Even though these conditions affect significantly the relative performance of regional employment offices, the managerial efficiency component does remain important. Finally, the job placement process is characterised by decreasing returns to scale.

[1]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[2]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[3]  M. Lechner.  Program Heterogeneity and Propensity Score Matching: An Application to the Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policies , 2002, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[4]  John P. Martin,et al.  What Works and for Whom: A Review of OECD Countries' Experiences with Active Labour Market Policies , 2002 .

[5]  La gestion publique de l'eau en Suisse , 2006 .

[6]  J. C. van Ours,et al.  Matching employers and workers : An empirical analysis on the effectiveness of search , 1991 .

[7]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[8]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[9]  Philippe Thalmann,et al.  Gradual Introduction of Coercive Instruments in Climate Policy , 2006 .

[10]  L'eau de boisson : aspects logistiques et attitude du consommateur , 2006 .

[11]  The Matching Efficiency of Regional Labor Markets: A Stochastic Production Frontier Estimation, France 1990-1995 , 2001, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  S. Kumbhakar,et al.  Labour-Use Efficiency in Swedish Social Insurance Offices , 1995 .

[13]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Microeconometric Evaluation of the Active Labour Market Policy in Switzerland , 2000 .

[14]  F. Førsund,et al.  Slack-adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units , 1996 .

[15]  M. Lechner,et al.  A Microeconometric Evaluation of Active Labor Market Policy in Switzerland , 2001 .

[16]  J. Zweimüller,et al.  The Impact of Active Labor Market Programs and Benefit Entitlement on the Duration of Unemployment , 2000 .

[17]  Andrea Baranzini,et al.  La demande de récréation pour un parc naturel : une application au Bois de Pfyn-Finges, Suisse , 2006 .

[18]  C. Pissarides,et al.  Looking into the black box: a survey of the matching function , 2001 .

[19]  G. Battese,et al.  Prediction of firm-level technical efficiencies with a generalized frontier production function and panel data , 1988 .

[20]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods , 2002 .

[21]  J. Ramirez,et al.  Swiss unemployment policy : an evaluation of the public employment service , 2004 .

[22]  C. Lovell,et al.  On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model , 1982 .

[23]  W. Greene.  The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis , 2008 .

[24]  G. Sheldon,et al.  The Efficiency of Public Employment Services: A Nonparametric Matching Function Analysis for Switzerland , 2003 .

[25]  J. Ramirez,et al.  Unemployment and employment offices’ efficiency: What can be done? , 2006 .

[26]  Sylvain Weber,et al.  Measuring the Performance of Microfinance Institutions , 2006 .

[27]  P. Diamond,et al.  The Beveridge Curve , 1990 .

[28]  Michael Lechner,et al.  Unemployed and their caseworkers: should they be friends or foes? , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.