Iran Aerospace Industries KM Approach Based on a Comparative Study: A Benchmarking on Successful Practices

Purpose – The main objective of this article is to develop a knowledge management approach in Iran aerospace industries based on the findings through the analysis of successful practices in knowledge management area.Design/Methodology/Approach – A qualitative case study technique has been used in this paper for data collection and analysis. For that, “grounded theory” research approach has been selected by which the collected data from successful organizations in KM adoption are categorized and analyzed. The extracted concepts were deployed in Iran aerospace industries to present a KM approach through benchmarking.Findings – The overall results from the case studies analysis were positive, thus reflecting the appropriateness for benchmarking. The extracted concepts clarify how to develop knowledge management approach in an organization. This approach has been applied in a large case study in Iran and is supported by practical implementation in AIO, one of the most important high-tech industries in Iran.Practical Implications – This paper provides a helpful roadmap for practitioners in implementing knowledge management through out the organizations and especially in large scale ones. This helps to ensure that the essential issues are covered during design and implementation phase. For academics, it provides a common language for them to deploy a KM approach in the organizations.Originality/Value – This study is probably the first to provide a benchmarked integrated KM approach based on the critical success factors extracted by analysis a multi case study research. This study further opens up new lines of research and highlights implications for knowledge management efforts through benchmarking. It gives valuable information and guidelines which hopefully will help the leaders to deploy knowledge management in their organizations.

[1]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[2]  Peyman Akhavan,et al.  Mapping Network Warfare Techniques to KM: Applying Lessons and Theories from the Most Demanding Arena of All , 2006 .

[3]  Greg Laugero,et al.  Managing Knowledge , 1998 .

[4]  P. Senge.  The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[5]  B. Glaser.  Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in the Methodology of Grounded Theory , 1978 .

[6]  William J. Gostic.  Aerospace supply chain management , 1998 .

[7]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[8]  B. Glaser.  The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted With Description , 2001 .

[9]  B. Glaser.  Doing grounded theory : issues and discussions , 1998 .

[10]  Karen Locke.  Grounded Theory in Management Research , 2000 .

[11]  Helmut Krcmar,et al.  A strategy for knowledge management , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[12]  Murray E. Jennex,et al.  Case Studies In Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[13]  Syed Omar Sharifuddin Syed-Ikhsan,et al.  Benchmarking knowledge management in a public organisation in Malaysia , 2004 .

[14]  Guy A. Boy,et al.  Knowledge Management in the Design of Safety-Critical Systems , 2003 .

[15]  Malee V. Lucas,et al.  Architectural innovation in product development through early supplier integration , 1998 .

[16]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Measuring intangible corporate assets: Linking business strategy with intellectual capital , 2000 .

[17]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Knowledge Mangement in Pursuit of Performance: Insights from Nortel Networks , 2002, MIS Q..

[18]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory , 2017 .

[19]  A. Graham,et al.  A question of balance: Case studies in strategic knowledge management , 1996 .

[20]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[21]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .