"The less I trust, the less I contribute (or not)?": The effects of trust, accountability and self-monitoring in social dilemmas

The present research examined the influence of trust, accountability, and self-monitoring on individual decision makers' willingness to contribute in a give-some game and in an experimental public goods dilemma. Previous research has shown that trust and contributions are positively related such that high trusters generally contribute more than low trusters. The present research questions the pervasiveness of this relation by arguing that low trusters may increase their contributions to the same level as those of high trusters, but only under circumstances where their decisions are highly identifiable to their interaction partner(s). Both studies showed that strong perceptions of trust, high accountability and high self-monitoring influenced contributions positively. In line with predictions, individuals low in trust contributed up to the same level as high trusters when accountability was high rather than low. Moreover, this interaction between trust and accountability was only found among those classified as high self-monitors. Our results suggest that the well-known positive relation between trust and contributions may take a different form when situational cues and individual predispositions are taken into account. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Siegfried Dewitte,et al.  Effect of Trust and Accountability in Mixed-Motive Situations , 2002, The Journal of social psychology.

[2]  David De Cremer,et al.  Trust and fear of exploitation in a public goods dilemma , 1999 .

[3]  C. Parks,et al.  High And Low Trusters' Responses To Fear in a Payoff Matrix , 1995 .

[4]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Social Comparison Processes , 1954 .

[5]  N. Kerr.  Norms in social dilemmas , 1995 .

[6]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Effects of public and private self-awareness on deindividuation and aggression. , 1982 .

[7]  B. Rosen,et al.  Effects of opportunity to communicate and visibility of individual decisions on behavior in the common interest. , 1974 .

[8]  David M. Messick,et al.  INDIVIDUAL ADAPTATIONS AND STRUCTURAL-CHANGE AS SOLUTIONS TO SOCIAL DILEMMAS , 1983 .

[9]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[10]  T. Yamagishi.  The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good , 1986 .

[11]  Elizabeth Newton,et al.  The Social Context of Negotiation , 1993 .

[12]  Melvin J. Kimmel,et al.  Twenty Years of Experimental Gaming: Critique,Synthesis, and Suggestions for the Future , 1977 .

[13]  M. Snyder.  Public Appearances, Private Realities: The Psychology of Self-Monitoring , 1986 .

[14]  Willem Burgers,et al.  Properties of Trust: An Analytical View , 1997 .

[15]  H. Kelley.  The proper study of social psychology , 2000 .

[16]  Gareth R. Jones,et al.  The experience and evolution of trust: Implications for cooperation and teamwork , 1998 .

[17]  P. V. Lange,et al.  The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation. , 1999 .

[18]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[19]  A. van Witteloostuijn,et al.  The impact of personality on behavior in five Prisoner's Dilemma games , 1999 .

[20]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[21]  D. Hocevar,et al.  Self-monitoring and student integration of community college students. , 1998, The Journal of social psychology.

[22]  T. Schelling,et al.  The Strategy of Conflict. , 1961 .

[23]  C. Parks,et al.  The Predictive Ability of Social Values in Resource Dilemmas and Public Goods Games , 1994 .

[24]  P. Tetlock.  Accountability: The neglected social context of judgment and choice. , 1985 .

[25]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social value orientation and intelligence: A test of the goal prescribes rationality principle , 1991 .

[26]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Understanding personality and social behavior: A functionalist strategy: Vol. 1 , 1998 .

[27]  H. Reis,et al.  On Mediating Equity, Equality, and Self-Interest: The Role of Self-Presentation in Social Exchange. , 1976 .

[28]  The quest for similar instances and simultaneous possibilities : Metaphors in social dilemma research , 1996 .

[29]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: When Norms Do and Do not Affect Behavior , 2000 .

[30]  W. H. Jones,et al.  Measuring Levels of Trust , 1997 .

[31]  D. Cremer,et al.  Social identification effects in social dilemmas : a transformation of motives , 1999 .

[32]  M. Snyder.  Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. , 1974 .

[33]  Mark Levine,et al.  On the consequences of deindividuation manipulations for the strategic communication of self: Identifiability and the presentation of social identity. , 1994 .

[34]  T. Tyler,et al.  A Relational Model of Authority in Groups , 1992 .

[35]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan , 1994 .

[36]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[37]  R. Baron.  Personality and organizational conflict: Effects of the type a behavior pattern and self-monitoring☆ , 1989 .

[38]  Paul A. M. Van Lange,et al.  Social Value Orientations and Impressions of Partner's Honesty and Intelligence: A Test of the Might Versus Morality Effect , 1994 .

[39]  M. Foddy,et al.  Trust and the Consumption of a Deteriorating Common Resource , 1987 .

[40]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[41]  W. Hays,et al.  Statistics (3rd ed.). , 1982 .

[42]  K. Dirks.  The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. , 1999, The Journal of applied psychology.

[43]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Presentation Theory: Self-Construction and Audience Pleasing , 1987 .

[44]  K. Aquino,et al.  The Effects of Resource Distribution, Voice, and Decision Framing on the Provision of Public Goods , 1992 .

[45]  John Orbell,et al.  The Minimal Contributing Set as a Solution to Public Goods Problems , 1983, American Political Science Review.

[46]  T. Yamagishi,et al.  Motivational bases of the public goods problem. , 1986 .

[47]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. , 1996 .

[48]  William H. Ross,et al.  MULTIPLE MEANINGS OF TRUST IN NEGOTIATION THEORY AND RESEARCH: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND INTEGRATIVE MODEL , 1996 .

[49]  S. Gangestad,et al.  On the nature of self-monitoring: matters of assessment, matters of validity. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  P. Tetlock.  The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model , 1992 .

[51]  M. Nicholson.  The Resolution of Conflict , 1967 .

[52]  R. Baumeister.  Self-esteem : the puzzle of low self-regard , 1993 .

[53]  Eric van Dijk,et al.  Coordination rules in asymmetric social dilemmas: a comparison between public good dilemmas and resource dilemmas , 1995 .

[54]  J. Rotter.  Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness, and gullibility. , 1980 .

[55]  P. Tetlock,et al.  Accounting for the effects of accountability. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.