27th Annual Inter national Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society

Only a small minority of mobile healthcare technologies that have been successful in pilot studies have subsequently been integrated into healthcare systems. Understanding the reasons behind this discrepancy is crucial if such technologies are to be adopted. We believe that the mismatch is due to a breakdown in the relation between technical soundness of the original mobile health (mHealth) device design, and integration into healthcare provision workflows. Quantitative workflow modelling provides an opportunity to test this hypothesis. In this paper we present our current progress in developing a clinical workflow model for mobile eye assessment in low-income settings. We test the model for determining the appropriateness of design parameters of a mHealth device within this workflow, by assessing their impact on the entire clinical workflow

[1]  Guido Biffi Gentili,et al.  A versatile microwave plethysmograph for the monitoring of physiological parameters , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Andrew W. Appel,et al.  Standard ML of New Jersey , 1991, PLILP.

[3]  Richard E. Haskell,et al.  Transient signal propagation in lossless, isotropic plasmas , 1967 .

[4]  Sunil Kumar Agrawal,et al.  Gravity-Balancing Leg Orthosis and Its Performance Evaluation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[5]  A. Medl,et al.  Time Frequency and Wavelets in Biomedical Signal Processing , 1998, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[6]  J.E. Monzon.  The cultural approach to telemedicine in Latin American homes , 2000, Proceedings 2000 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine. ITAB-ITIS 2000. Joint Meeting Third IEEE EMBS International Conference on Information Technol.

[7]  K Bachmann,et al.  [Prenatal recording of fetal heart action with magnetocardiography]. , 1998, Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.

[8]  E. Todeva.  Networks , 2007 .