Search patterns and absorptive capacity : a comparison of low- and high-technology firms from thirteen European countries

Searching for externally available knowledge has been characterised as a vital part of the innovation process. Previous research has, however, almost exclusively focused on hightechnology environments, largely ignoring the substantial low- and medium-technology sectors of modern economies. We argue that low- and high-technology firms differ in their search patterns and that these moderate the relationship between innovation inputs and outputs. Based on a sample of 4,500 firms from 13 European countries we find that search patterns in low-technology industries focus on market knowledge while they are built around differences in technology sourcing activities for high-technology industries.

[1]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[2]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[3]  Nabil Amara,et al.  Effects of Sources of Information on Novelty of Innovation in Canadian Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from the 1999 Statistics Canada Innovation Survey , 2002 .

[4]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[5]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[6]  Eric W. K. Tsang.  Transaction Cost and Resource-Based Explanations of Joint Ventures: A Comparison and Synthesis , 2000 .

[7]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Knowledge, Strategy, and the Theory of the Firm , 1996 .

[8]  B. Kogut,et al.  INTERFIRM COOPERATION AND STARTUP INNOVATION IN THE BIOTECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY. , 1993 .

[9]  Mark Dodgson,et al.  External Linkages and Innovation in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises , 1991 .

[10]  A. Jaffe.  Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms&Apos; Patents, Profits and Market Value , 1986 .

[11]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[12]  K. Brockhoff.  Industrial research for future competitiveness , 1997 .

[13]  Bronwyn H. Hall.  Corporate Restructuring and Investment Horizons in the United States, 1976–1987 , 1994 .

[14]  J. Fagerberg.  Innovation: A Guide to the Literature , 2003 .

[15]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[16]  Patrick Waelbroeck,et al.  Assessing spillovers from universities to firms: evidence from French firm-level data , 2003 .

[17]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  External technology integration in product and process development , 2004 .

[18]  Bronwyn H Hall,et al.  Corporate Restructuring and Investment Horizons , 1991 .

[19]  W. Mitchell,et al.  Learning from competing partners: outcomes and durations of scale and link alliances in Europe, North America and Asia , 2000 .

[20]  K. Pavitt.  Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[21]  A. Link,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Propensity of Academics to Engage In Informal University Technology Transfer , 2007 .

[22]  Ulrich Kaiser.  An empirical test of models explaining research expenditures and research cooperation: evidence for the German service sector , 2002 .

[23]  J. Marshall.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2004 .

[24]  Lori Rosenkopf.  BEYOND LOCAL SEARCH : BOUNDARY-SPANNING , EXPLORATION AND IMPACT IN THE OPTICAL DISC INDUSTRY Running Head : “ Beyond Local Search ” , 2000 .

[25]  A. Link,et al.  Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. , 2004 .

[26]  G. Day.  The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations , 1994 .

[27]  E. H. Bowman,et al.  Strategy through the Option Lens: An Integrated View of Resource Investments and the Incremental-Choice Process , 1993 .

[28]  O. Gassmann,et al.  Organization of industrial R&D on a global scale , 1998 .

[29]  K. Brockhoff.  Technological progress and the market value of firms , 1999 .

[30]  H. Gemünden,et al.  Technological interweavement: a means of achieving innovation success , 1992 .

[31]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[32]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Fortune favors the prepared firm , 1994 .

[33]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation and Peformance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[34]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[35]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[36]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[37]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .

[38]  J. Vermunt,et al.  Technical Guide for Latent GOLD Choice 4 . 0 : Basic and Advanced 1 , 2006 .

[39]  M. Rothschild,et al.  The Economics of Patents , 2002 .

[40]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[41]  Nancy Gallini,et al.  The Economics of Patents: Lessons from Recent U.S. Patent Reform , 2002 .

[42]  K. R. Conner.  A Historical Comparison of Resource-Based Theory and Five Schools of Thought Within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm? , 1991 .

[43]  Boris Durisin,et al.  Absorptive capacity: Valuing a reconceptualization , 2007 .

[44]  John Van Reenen,et al.  Patents, Real Options and Firm Performance , 2002 .

[45]  Geoffrey J. McLachlan,et al.  Finite Mixture Models , 2019, Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application.

[46]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[47]  M. Peters.  Education Policy in the Age of Knowledge Capitalism , 2003 .

[48]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[49]  M. Nadiri,et al.  Innovations and Technological Spillovers , 1993 .

[50]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[51]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[52]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms , 2005 .

[53]  R. Katila,et al.  SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: A LONGITUDINAL STUDY OF SEARCH BEHAVIOR AND NEW PRODUCT INTRODUCTION , 2002 .

[54]  S. Mullainathan,et al.  Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data , 2001 .

[55]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Co-evolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and Knowledge Environment: Organizational Forms and Combinative Capabilities , 1999 .

[56]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[57]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[58]  W. Mitchell,et al.  The effect of introducing important incremental innovations on market share and business survival , 1995 .

[59]  B. Kogut,et al.  Exploring internal stickiness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm , 2007 .

[60]  Robert A. Frosch,et al.  The Customer for R&D Is Always Wrong! , 1996 .

[61]  E. Levitas,et al.  Signaling the Strategic Value of Knowledge , 2004 .

[62]  D. Third.  OECD/Eurostat . Oslo Manual-Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Paris, France: , 2005 .

[63]  M. Tushman,et al.  Resource recombinations in the firm: knowledge structures and the potential for schumpeterian innovation , 1998 .

[64]  J. Liebeskind,et al.  Keeping Organizational Secrets: Protective Institutional Mechanisms and their Costs , 1997 .

[65]  R. Puryear,et al.  Strategic sourcing: from periphery to the core. , 2005, Harvard business review.

[66]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[67]  Balaji R. Koka,et al.  The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct , 2006 .

[68]  J. Hagenaars,et al.  Applied Latent Class Analysis , 2003 .

[69]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Managing customer oriented research , 2002, Int. J. Technol. Manag..