Zero-Adjective contrast in much-less ellipsis: the advantage for parallel syntax

ABSTRACT This paper explores the processing of sentences with a much less coordinator (I don’t own a pink hat, much less a red one). This understudied ellipsis sentence, one of several focus-sensitive coordination structures, imposes syntactic and semantic conditions on the relationship between the correlate (a pink hat) and the remnant (a red one). We present the case of zero-adjective contrast, in which an NP remnant introduces an adjective without an overt counterpart in the correlate (I don’t own a hat, much less a red one). Although zero-adjective contrast could in principle ease comprehension by limiting the possible relationships between the remnant and correlate to entailment, we find that zero-adjective contrast is avoided in production and taxing in online processing. Results from several studies support a processing model in which syntactic parallelism is the primary guide for determining contrast in ellipsis structures, even when violating parallelism would assist in computing semantic relationships.

[1]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Bert Cappelle,et al.  An afterthought on let alone , 2015 .

[3]  William A. Ladusaw,et al.  Sluicing and logical form , 1995 .

[4]  Muffy E. A. Siegel,et al.  Gapping and interpretation , 1984 .

[5]  Michael Walsh Dickey,et al.  Comprehension of elided structure: Evidence from sluicing , 2011 .

[6]  David I. Beaver,et al.  Sense and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines Meaning , 2008 .

[7]  Alan Garnham,et al.  Late Closure in Context , 1998 .

[8]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Information Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist , 2018, Language and speech.

[9]  Jason Merchant,et al.  Fragments and ellipsis , 2005 .

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[11]  Richard K. Larson,et al.  On the syntax of disjunction scope , 1985 .

[12]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Processing the noun phrase versus sentence coordination ambiguity: Thematic information does not completely eliminate processing difficulty , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  C. Clifton,et al.  Focus, Accent, and Argument Structure: Effects on Language Comprehension , 1995, Language and speech.

[14]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Potato not Pope: human brain potentials to gender expectation and agreement in Spanish spoken sentences , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  Frank Keller,et al.  Syntactic priming in comprehension: Parallelism effects with and without coordination , 2010 .

[16]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[17]  L Frazier,et al.  Processing Coordinate Structures , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[18]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  Parallel structure: A source of facilitation in sentence comprehension , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[21]  Maziar Toosarvandani,et al.  Letting negative polarity alone for let alone , 2008 .

[22]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Syntactic processing: Evidence from dutch , 1987 .

[23]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Processing Coordination Ambiguity , 2010, Language and speech.

[24]  P. Boersma Praat : doing phonetics by computer (version 5.1.05) , 2009 .

[25]  Carson T. Schütze,et al.  Disambiguation Preferences in Noun Phrase Conjunction Do Not Mirror Corpus Frequency , 1999 .

[26]  R. Levy Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.

[27]  Adrian Staub,et al.  The Effect of Lexical Predictability on Eye Movements in Reading: Critical Review and Theoretical Interpretation , 2015, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[28]  Jelena Mirkovic,et al.  Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[29]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[30]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Parsing Coordinates and Ellipsis: Copy α , 2001 .

[31]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Jesse A. Harris Processing let alone coordination in silent reading , 2016 .

[33]  K Carlson,et al.  The Effects of Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Gapping Structures , 2001, Language and speech.

[34]  Lisa Gruenberg A Beautiful Day , 2014 .

[35]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Comprehension of Sluiced Sentences. , 1998 .

[36]  Michael K. Tanenhaus,et al.  A note on parallelism effects in processing deep and surface verb-phrase anaphora , 1995 .

[37]  A. Kratzer Severing the External Argument from its Verb , 1996 .

[38]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence from German , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[39]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood: An Event-Related Potential Study of Lexical Relationships and Prediction in Context. , 2009, Journal of memory and language.

[40]  Pia Knoeferle,et al.  Conjunction meaning can modulate parallelism facilitation: Eye-tracking evidence from German clausal coordination , 2014 .

[41]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing , 1996 .

[42]  Elisabeth Selkirk,et al.  Phonology and syntax , 1984 .

[43]  Charles Clifton,et al.  Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of utterances , 2002 .

[44]  Katherine A. DeLong,et al.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Matthew Walenski,et al.  The role of parallelism in the real-time processing of anaphora , 2012, Language and cognitive processes.

[46]  Matthew Ong Strict and sloppy reflexives in VP-ellipsis , 2013 .

[47]  Katy Carlson,et al.  Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences , 2002 .

[48]  Jesse A. Harris,et al.  Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in “let alone” ellipsis , 2016, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[49]  Bernhard Schwarz,et al.  On the Syntax of either...or , 1999 .

[50]  Michael Frazier,et al.  Pseudo Noun Phrase Coordination , 2012 .