Negative ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-year follow-up.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] W. Baxt,et al. One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[2] L. Mitsumori,et al. Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[3] H. Hod,et al. Usefulness of routine use of multidetector coronary computed tomography in the "fast track" evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.
[4] L. Mitsumori,et al. Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[5] Fabian Bamberg,et al. Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[6] W. Baxt,et al. Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.
[7] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.
[8] F. Lin,et al. Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2008, Radiology.
[9] M. Weinstein,et al. Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.
[10] R. Khare,et al. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[11] Fuminari Tatsugami,et al. Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.
[12] Practicality, safety and accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in the evaluation of low TIMI‐risk score chest pain patients: A pilot study , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.
[13] William W O'Neill,et al. A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[14] R. Nowak,et al. Modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome , 2007, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.
[15] W. Baxt,et al. Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[16] Brian O'Neil,et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.
[17] L. Shaw,et al. Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.
[18] S. Goodacre,et al. Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.
[19] E. Antman,et al. The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.
[20] R. Frye,et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.