Negative ECG-gated cardiac CT in patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department: 1-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this article is to determine the frequency of adverse cardiac events during the year following a negative cardiac CT angiogram in a population of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-to-moderate risk chest pain. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Eighty-one consecutive patients who had standard of care evaluation for low-to-moderate risk chest pain in the emergency department were enrolled and consented to have a cardiac CT angiogram added to their workup and to have follow-up for 1 year. Eleven patients were excluded, six because their cardiac CT examinations were unsuccessful, four because of a positive cardiac CT angiogram result, and one was lost to follow-up. Seventy patients with negative cardiac CT angiographic results (< 50% stenosis) were included and were interviewed in detail at 3, 6, and 12 months about intervening cardiac events, diagnostic testing, and therapy. Electronic medical records were also reviewed at each time point. RESULTS None of the 70 patients reported an adverse cardiac event over the 12-month follow-up period. At 1 year, the cause of chest pain was unknown in 49 patients, gastrointestinal in nine patients, anxiety in seven patients, musculoskeletal in three patients, and other in two patients. Three of four patients with 50% or greater stenosis on their cardiac CT had subsequent cardiac catheterization and stent placement. CONCLUSION In patients with low-to-moderate risk chest pain evaluated in the emergency department, adverse cardiac events may be rare during the 12 months following a negative cardiac CT angiogram.

[1]  W. Baxt,et al.  One-year outcomes following coronary computerized tomographic angiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[2]  L. Mitsumori,et al.  Low-risk patients with chest pain in the emergency department: negative 64-MDCT coronary angiography may reduce length of stay and hospital charges. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  H. Hod,et al.  Usefulness of routine use of multidetector coronary computed tomography in the "fast track" evaluation of patients with acute chest pain. , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  L. Mitsumori,et al.  Whole-chest 64-MDCT of emergency department patients with nonspecific chest pain: Radiation dose and coronary artery image quality with prospective ECG triggering versus retrospective ECG gating. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  W. Baxt,et al.  Coronary computed tomographic angiography for rapid discharge of low-risk patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, Annals of emergency medicine.

[7]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. , 2008, European heart journal.

[8]  F. Lin,et al.  Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multidetector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. , 2008, Radiology.

[9]  M. Weinstein,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of coronary MDCT in the triage of patients with acute chest pain. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  R. Khare,et al.  Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. , 2008, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[11]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[12]  Practicality, safety and accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography in the evaluation of low TIMI‐risk score chest pain patients: A pilot study , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[13]  William W O'Neill,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of multi-slice coronary computed tomography for evaluation of acute chest pain. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  R. Nowak,et al.  Modified Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) risk score to risk stratify patients in the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome , 2007, Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis.

[15]  W. Baxt,et al.  Computed tomography coronary angiography for rapid disposition of low-risk emergency department patients with chest pain syndromes. , 2007, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[16]  Brian O'Neil,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography compared with stress nuclear imaging in emergency department low-risk chest pain patients. , 2007, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  L. Shaw,et al.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  S. Goodacre,et al.  Cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies for patients with acute, undifferentiated chest pain , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[19]  E. Antman,et al.  The TIMI risk score for unstable angina/non-ST elevation MI: A method for prognostication and therapeutic decision making. , 2000, JAMA.

[20]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.