3-D Electrical Impedance Tomography for Piecewise Constant Domains With Known Internal Boundaries

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a badly posed inverse problem, but can be stabilized if one assumes that the conductivity is piecewise constant, with a relatively small number of distinct regions, and that the region boundaries are known, for example from prior anatomical imaging. With this assumption, we introduce a three-dimensional (3-D) boundary element method (BEM) model for the forward EIT map from injected currents to measured voltages, and 3-D inverse solutions for both BEM and the finite element method (FEM) which explicitly take into account the parameterization implied by the known boundary locations. We develop expressions for the Jacobians for both methods, since they are nonlinear, to more rapidly solve the inverse problem. We show simulation results in a torso geometry with the heart and lungs as inhomogeneities. In a simulation study, we could reconstruct the conductive values of some internal organs of a human torso with more than 92% accuracy even with inaccurate internal boundary locations, a randomized rather than constant conductivity profile (with the standard deviation of the Gaussian-distributed conductivities set to 20% of their mean values), signal to measurement noise of 50 dB, and with different meshes used for the forward and inverse problems. BEM and FEM perform similarly, leading to the conclusion that the choice between them should be based on secondary considerations such as computational efficiency or the need to model conductivity anisotropies

[1]  Ramani Duraiswami,et al.  Efficient 2D and 3D electrical impedance tomography using dual reciprocity boundary element techniques , 1998 .

[2]  M. P. Nash,et al.  Noninvasive Electrical Imaging of the Heart: Theory and Model Development , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. Newell,et al.  Theory and performance of an adaptive current tomography system. , 1988, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[4]  S. Vavasis Stable finite elements for problems with wild coefficients , 1996 .

[5]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  SCIRun/BioPSE: integrated problem solving environment for bioelectric field problems and visualization , 2004, 2004 2nd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro (IEEE Cat No. 04EX821).

[7]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[8]  K. T. Ng,et al.  Anatomically constrained electrical impedance tomography for anisotropic bodies via a two-step approach , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[9]  Dana H. Brooks,et al.  Spherical harmonics for shape-based inverse problems as applied to electrical impedance tomography , 2006, Electronic Imaging.

[10]  Arto Voutilainen,et al.  Estimation of non-stationary region boundaries in EIT—state estimation approach , 2001 .

[11]  William R B Lionheart,et al.  A Matlab toolkit for three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a contribution to the Electrical Impedance and Diffuse Optical Reconstruction Software project , 2002 .

[12]  David Isaacson,et al.  A deformable-radius B-spline method for shape-based inverse problems, as applied to electrical impedance tomography , 2005, Proceedings. (ICASSP '05). IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2005..

[13]  Simon J. Cox,et al.  Efficient Non-Linear 3D Electrical Tomography Reconstruction , 2001 .

[14]  Jan C. de Munck,et al.  The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Thomas F. Coleman,et al.  An Interior Trust Region Approach for Nonlinear Minimization Subject to Bounds , 1993, SIAM J. Optim..

[16]  Marko Vauhkonen,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography and prior information , 1997 .

[17]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Statistical inverse problems: discretization, model reduction and inverse crimes , 2007 .

[18]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography of complex conductivity distributions with noncircular boundary , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[19]  R. Barr,et al.  Relating Epicardial to Body Surface Potential Distributions by Means of Transfer Coefficients Based on Geometry Measurements , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  Model Studies with the Inversely Calculated lsochrones of Ventricular Depolarization , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Martin Hanke,et al.  Recent progress in electrical impedance tomography , 2003 .

[22]  P D Wolf,et al.  Estimation of tissue resistivities from multiple-electrode impedance measurements. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  C.R. Johnson,et al.  The effects of inhomogeneities and anisotropies on electrocardiographic fields: a 3-D finite-element study , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[24]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Control applications of nonlinear convex programming , 1998 .

[25]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2002, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[26]  M. N. Morrow,et al.  The Effects of Thoracic Inhomogeneities on the Relationship Between Epicardial and Torso Potentials , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  William R B Lionheart EIT reconstruction algorithms: pitfalls, challenges and recent developments. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[28]  B H Brown,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography (EIT): a review , 2003, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[29]  Robert V. Kohn,et al.  Determining conductivity by boundary measurements , 1984 .

[30]  Ramani Duraiswami,et al.  Boundary element techniques for efficient 2-D and 3-D electrical impedance tomography , 1997 .

[31]  E. Loli Piccolomini,et al.  The conjugate gradient regularization method in Computed Tomography problems , 1999, Appl. Math. Comput..

[32]  J. D. Munck,et al.  The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[33]  Armand Wirgin,et al.  The inverse crime , 2004, math-ph/0401050.

[34]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Existence and uniqueness for electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1992 .

[35]  J. D. Munck A linear discretization of the volume conductor boundary integral equation using analytically integrated elements (electrophysiology application) , 1992 .

[36]  L M Heikkinen,et al.  A MATLAB package for the EIDORS project to reconstruct two-dimensional EIT images. , 2001, Physiological measurement.

[37]  David Isaacson,et al.  Electric current computed tomography eigenvalues , 1990 .

[38]  Fetsje Bijma,et al.  In vivo measurement of the brain and skull resistivities using an EIT-based method and realistic models for the head , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[39]  D. Djajaputra Electrical Impedance Tomography: Methods, History and Applications , 2005 .