Probability theories in general and quantum theory in particular

Abstract We consider probability theories in general. In the first part of the paper, various constraints are imposed and classical probability and quantum theory are recovered as special cases. Quantum theory follows from a set of five reasonable axioms. The key axiom which gives us quantum theory rather than classical probability theory is the continuity axiom, which demands that there exists a continuous reversible transformation between any pair of pure states. In the second part of this paper, we consider in detail how the measurement process works in both the classical and the quantum case. The key differences and similarities are elucidated. It is shown how measurement in the classical case can be given a simple ontological interpretation which is not open to us in the quantum case. On the other hand, it is shown that the measurement process can be treated mathematically in the same way in both theories even to the extent that the equations governing the state update after measurement are identical. The difference between the two cases is seen to be due not to something intrinsic to the measurement process itself but, rather, to the nature of the set of allowed states and, therefore, ultimately to the continuity axiom.

[1]  C. Rovelli,et al.  Relational Quantum Mechanics , 2006 .

[2]  D. A. Edwards The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics , 1979, Synthese.

[3]  W. H. Zurek Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information , 1990 .

[4]  Nicolaas P. Landsman,et al.  Mathematical Topics Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics , 1998 .

[5]  C. Fuchs Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more) , 2002, quant-ph/0205039.

[6]  A. Zeilinger A Foundational Principle for Quantum Mechanics , 1999, Synthese Library.

[7]  K. Kraus,et al.  States, effects, and operations : fundamental notions of quantum theory : lectures in mathematical physics at the University of Texas at Austin , 1983 .

[8]  G. Ludwig Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories. III , 1968 .

[9]  Jeffrey Bub,et al.  Characterizing Quantum Theory in Terms of Information-Theoretic Constraints , 2002 .

[10]  L. Hardy Quantum Theory From Five Reasonable Axioms , 2001, quant-ph/0101012.

[11]  H. Dishkant,et al.  Logic of Quantum Mechanics , 1976 .

[12]  Günter Dähn,et al.  Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories. IV , 1968 .

[13]  William K. Wootters,et al.  Quantum mechanics without probability amplitudes , 1986 .

[14]  Bob Coecke,et al.  Current research in operational quantum logic : algebras, categories, languages , 2000 .

[15]  Luigi Accardi Can mathematics help solving the interpretational problems of quantum theory? , 1995 .

[16]  Fivel How interference effects in mixtures determine the rules of quantum mechanics. , 1994, Physical Review A. Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics.

[17]  J. Schwinger THE GEOMETRY OF QUANTUM STATES. , 1960, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Morrow,et al.  Foundations of Quantum Mechanics , 1968 .

[19]  Günther Ludwig,et al.  Attempt of an axiomatic foundation of quantum mechanics and more general theories, II , 1967 .

[20]  Lucien Hardy,et al.  Why Quantum Theory , 2001, quant-ph/0111068.