Evaluation of the thin-skin approximation boundary element method for electromagnetic induction scattering problems

A conductive object subject to an applied varying magnetic field will emit a secondary magnetic field or scattered field. The scattered field is dependent on the geometry of the object and its material properties (conductivity, permeability, etc). If we can calculate the scattered field for a given geometry (the scattering problem), we can infer the material properties from the detected electromagnetic response. Our motivation is the production of induction based classifiers for object and material classification. Applications include sorting of high value scrap metal and identifying UXO from clutter in landmine clearance. To this end, we require methods of solving the scattering problem quickly and accurately. In this paper, we evaluate the thin-skin approximation boundary element method. The method offers a particularly compact formulation of the scattering problem which is quick to solve. We compare this method to the more established finite element method. We find that larger objects at higher frequencies and conductivities appear to give good agreement between the two methods. However, the agreement breaks down for smaller objects even when the frequency or conductivity is relatively high for typical induction based sensing. This is especially true when the object has a complex geometry. This imposes limitations on the practical usefulness of this approach.

[1]  Joachim Schöberl,et al.  NETGEN An advancing front 2D/3D-mesh generator based on abstract rules , 1997 .

[2]  Irma Shamatava,et al.  Theoretical analysis and range of validity of TSA formulation for application to UXO discrimination , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[3]  Antonello Tamburrino,et al.  Fast computational methods for large-scale eddy-current computation , 2002 .

[4]  Keli Sun,et al.  Simulation of electromagnetic induction scattering from targets with negligible to moderate penetration by primary fields , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Roberto D. Graglia,et al.  On the numerical integration of the linear shape functions times the 3-D Green's function or its gradient on a plane triangle , 1993 .

[6]  Ari Visa,et al.  Determination of material and geometric properties of metallic objects using the magnetic polarisability tensor , 2015, 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[7]  Walton C. Gibson,et al.  The Method of Moments in Electromagnetics , 2007 .

[8]  Anthony J. Peyton,et al.  Measurement system for determining the magnetic polarizability tensor of small metal targets , 2015, 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).

[10]  Utkarsh Ayachit,et al.  The ParaView Guide: A Parallel Visualization Application , 2015 .

[11]  Anthony J. Peyton,et al.  Three-dimensional object location and inversion of the magnetic polarizability tensor at a single frequency using a walk-through metal detector , 2013 .

[12]  Wuliang Yin,et al.  Prediction of the asymptotical magnetic polarization tensors for cylindrical samples using the boundary element method , 2015, 2015 IEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS).