Can single molecule localization microscopy be used to map closely spaced RGD nanodomains?

Cells sense and respond to nanoscale variations in the distribution of ligands to adhesion receptors. This makes single molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) an attractive tool to map the distribution of ligands on nanopatterned surfaces. We explore the use of SMLM spatial cluster analysis to detect nanodomains of the cell adhesion-stimulating tripeptide arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD). These domains were formed by the phase separation of block copolymers with controllable spacing on the scale of tens of nanometers. We first determined the topology of the block copolymer with atomic force microscopy (AFM) and then imaged the localization of individual RGD peptides with direct stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (dSTORM). To compare the data, we analyzed the dSTORM data with DBSCAN (density-based spatial clustering application with noise). The ligand distribution and polymer topology are not necessary identical since peptides may attach to the polymer outside the nanodomains and/or coupling and detection of peptides within the nanodomains is incomplete. We therefore performed simulations to explore the extent to which nanodomains could be mapped with dSTORM. We found that successful detection of nanodomains by dSTORM was influenced by the inter-domain spacing and the localization precision of individual fluorophores, and less by non-specific absorption of ligands to the substratum. For example, under our imaging conditions, DBSCAN identification of nanodomains spaced further than 50 nm apart was largely independent of background localisations, while nanodomains spaced closer than 50 nm required a localization precision of ~11 nm to correctly estimate the modal nearest neighbor distance (NDD) between nanodomains. We therefore conclude that SMLM is a promising technique to directly map the distribution and nanoscale organization of ligands and would benefit from an improved localization precision.

[1]  Zhiqun Lin,et al.  A Rapid Route to Arrays of Nanostructures in Thin Films , 2002 .

[2]  H. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Optimized localization-analysis for single-molecule tracking and super-resolution microscopy , 2010, Nature Methods.

[3]  L G Griffith,et al.  Cell adhesion and motility depend on nanoscale RGD clustering. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[4]  Peter Kner,et al.  Wavefront correction using machine learning methods for single molecule localization microscopy , 2015, Photonics West - Biomedical Optics.

[5]  Michael D. Mason,et al.  Ultra-high resolution imaging by fluorescence photoactivation localization microscopy. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[6]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) , 2006, Nature Methods.

[7]  R. Hochstrasser,et al.  Wide-field subdiffraction imaging by accumulated binding of diffusing probes , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Johannes B. Woehrstein,et al.  Multiplexed 3D Cellular Super-Resolution Imaging with DNA-PAINT and Exchange-PAINT , 2014, Nature Methods.

[9]  Jerry Chao,et al.  A comparative study of high resolution microscopy imaging modalities using a three-dimensional resolution measure. , 2009, Optics express.

[10]  T. Südhof,et al.  Ultrahigh-resolution imaging reveals formation of neuronal SNARE/Munc18 complexes in situ , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Imaging Intracellular Fluorescent Proteins at Nanometer Resolution , 2006, Science.

[12]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Conformational states of the kinase Lck regulate clustering in early T cell signaling , 2012, Nature Immunology.

[13]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of order and disorder in RGD nanopatterns on cell adhesion. , 2009, Nano letters.

[14]  Katharina Gaus,et al.  Single-Molecule Sensors: Challenges and Opportunities for Quantitative Analysis. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[15]  David Baddeley,et al.  Visualization of Localization Microscopy Data , 2010, Microscopy and Microanalysis.

[16]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  Kinetically constrained block copolymer self-assembly a simple method to control domain size , 2009 .

[17]  Shikuan Yang,et al.  Surface patterning using templates: concept, properties and device applications. , 2011, Chemical Society reviews.

[18]  K. Gaus,et al.  Spacing of integrin ligands influences signal transduction in endothelial cells. , 2011, Biophysical journal.

[19]  R. Hayward,et al.  Fluorescence imaging of nanoscale domains in polymer blends using stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). , 2014, Optics express.

[20]  David J. Williamson,et al.  Bayesian cluster identification in single-molecule localization microscopy data , 2015, Nature Methods.

[21]  J. Spatz,et al.  Block Copolymer Micelle Nanolithography , 2003 .

[22]  C. S. Chen,et al.  Geometric control of cell life and death. , 1997, Science.

[23]  Mark Schvartzman,et al.  Nanolithographic control of the spatial organization of cellular adhesion receptors at the single-molecule level. , 2011, Nano letters.

[24]  M. Heilemann,et al.  Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence imaging with conventional fluorescent probes. , 2008, Angewandte Chemie.

[25]  S. van de Linde,et al.  Quantitative Super-Resolution Microscopy of Nanopipette-Deposited Fluorescent Patterns. , 2015, ACS nano.

[26]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell interactions with hierarchically structured nano-patterned adhesive surfaces. , 2009, Soft matter.

[27]  J. Lippincott-Schwartz,et al.  Interferometric fluorescent super-resolution microscopy resolves 3D cellular ultrastructure , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  C. Bustamante,et al.  Counting single photoactivatable fluorescent molecules by photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  P. Gönczy,et al.  Resolution Doubling in 3D-STORM Imaging through Improved Buffers , 2013, PloS one.

[30]  E. Zamir,et al.  Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell-matrix adhesions. , 2001, Journal of cell science.

[31]  Astrid Magenau,et al.  PALM imaging and cluster analysis of protein heterogeneity at the cell surface , 2010, Journal of biophotonics.

[32]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  Recent applications of SEM and AFM for assessing topography of metal and related coatings — a review , 2011 .

[33]  Ricardo Henriques,et al.  PALM and STORM: Unlocking live‐cell super‐resolution , 2011, Biopolymers.

[34]  Benjamin Geiger,et al.  Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Matthew D. Lew,et al.  Three-dimensional superresolution colocalization of intracellular protein superstructures and the cell surface in live Caulobacter crescentus , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. , 2011, Nano letters.

[37]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  SR-Tesseler: a method to segment and quantify localization-based super-resolution microscopy data , 2015, Nature Methods.

[38]  T. Munro,et al.  Nanoscale presentation of cell adhesive molecules via block copolymer self-assembly. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[39]  Christian Eggeling,et al.  Breaking the diffraction barrier in fluorescence microscopy by optical shelving. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[40]  Mike Heilemann,et al.  Super-resolution imaging with small organic fluorophores. , 2009, Angewandte Chemie.

[41]  E. Gouaux,et al.  Dynamic superresolution imaging of endogenous proteins on living cells at ultra-high density. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[42]  Jake Olivier,et al.  Bicycle Helmet Wearing Is Not Associated with Close Motor Vehicle Passing: A Re-Analysis of Walker, 2007 , 2013, PloS one.

[43]  Markus Sauer,et al.  Eight years of single-molecule localization microscopy , 2014, Histochemistry and Cell Biology.

[44]  Joachim P. Spatz,et al.  Micro‐Nanostructured Interfaces Fabricated by the Use of Inorganic Block Copolymer Micellar Monolayers as Negative Resist for Electron‐Beam Lithography , 2003 .

[45]  Justin J. Cooper-White,et al.  Changing ligand number and type within nanocylindrical domains through kinetically constrained self-assembly - impacts of ligand 'redundancy' on human mesenchymal stem cell adhesion and morphology. , 2014, Biomaterials science.

[46]  Daniel Choquet,et al.  Integrins β1 and β3 exhibit distinct dynamic nanoscale organizations inside focal adhesions , 2012, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  Joachim P Spatz,et al.  Activation of integrin function by nanopatterned adhesive interfaces. , 2004, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[48]  J. Hubbell,et al.  An RGD spacing of 440 nm is sufficient for integrin alpha V beta 3- mediated fibroblast spreading and 140 nm for focal contact and stress fiber formation , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[49]  W. Webb,et al.  Precise nanometer localization analysis for individual fluorescent probes. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[50]  J. Cooper-White,et al.  Modulation of stem cell adhesion and morphology via facile control over surface presentation of cell adhesion molecules. , 2014, Biomacromolecules.

[51]  Y. Yamauchi,et al.  Electron microscopic study on aerosol-assisted synthesis of aluminum organophosphonates using flexible colloidal PS-b-PEO templates. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[52]  C. Hawker,et al.  Block Copolymer Nanolithography: Translation of Molecular Level Control to Nanoscale Patterns , 2009, Advanced materials.