Standardized automated training of rhesus monkeys for neuroscience research in their housing environment.

Teaching nonhuman primates the complex cognitive behavioral tasks that are central to cognitive neuroscience research is an essential and challenging endeavor. It is crucial for the scientific success that the animals learn to interpret the often complex task rules and reliably and enduringly act accordingly. To achieve consistent behavior and comparable learning histories across animals, it is desirable to standardize training protocols. Automatizing the training can significantly reduce the time invested by the person training the animal. In addition, self-paced training schedules with individualized learning speeds based on automatic updating of task conditions could enhance the animals' motivation and welfare. We developed a training paradigm for across-task unsupervised training (AUT) of successively more complex cognitive tasks to be administered through a stand-alone housing-based system optimized for rhesus monkeys in neuroscience research settings (Calapai A, Berger M, Niessing M, Heisig K, Brockhausen R, Treue S, Gail A. Behav Res Methods 5: 1-11, 2016). The AUT revealed interindividual differences in long-term learning progress between animals, helping to characterize learning personalities, and commonalities, helping to identify easier and more difficult learning steps in the training protocol. Our results demonstrate that 1) rhesus monkeys stay engaged with the AUT over months despite access to water and food outside the experimental sessions but with lower numbers of interaction compared with conventional fluid-controlled training; 2) with unsupervised training across sessions and task levels, rhesus monkeys can learn tasks of sufficient complexity for state-of-the-art cognitive neuroscience in their housing environment; and 3) AUT learning progress is primarily determined by the number of interactions with the system rather than the mere exposure time. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate that highly structured training of behavioral tasks, as used in neuroscience research, can be achieved in an unsupervised fashion over many sessions and task difficulties in a monkey housing environment. Employing a predefined training strategy allows for an observer-independent comparison of learning between animals and of training approaches. We believe that self-paced standardized training can be utilized for pretraining and animal selection and can contribute to animal welfare in a neuroscience research environment.

[1]  Julia Fischer,et al.  Old World Monkeys Compare to Apes in the Primate Cognition Test Battery , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  J. Hatfield,et al.  Within-session responding as a function of post-session feedings , 1991, Behavioural Processes.

[3]  D A Washburn,et al.  Testing primates with joystick-based automated apparatus: Lessons from the Language Research Center’s Computerized Test System , 1992, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[4]  K. Westlund Training is enrichment—And beyond , 2014 .

[5]  Kevin J Black,et al.  An Automated Motion Detection and Reward System for Animal Training , 2015, Cureus.

[6]  S. Schapiro,et al.  A Comparison of Positive Reinforcement Training Techniques in Owl and Squirrel Monkeys: Time Required to Train to Reliability , 2013, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[7]  D. Gaffan,et al.  Asymmetry of attentional set in rhesus monkeys learning colour and shape discriminations , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  J. Capitanio,et al.  Considerations in the selection and conditioning of Old World monkeys for laboratory research: animals from domestic sources. , 2006, ILAR journal.

[9]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Combining spatial and feature-based attention within the receptive field of MT neurons , 2009, Vision Research.

[10]  Stefan Treue,et al.  An Attention-Sensitive Memory Trace in Macaque MT Following Saccadic Eye Movements , 2016, PLoS biology.

[11]  R. Andersen,et al.  Neural Dynamics in Monkey Parietal Reach Region Reflect Context-Specific Sensorimotor Transformations , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  J. Coyle,et al.  Touchscreen assays of learning, response inhibition, and motivation in the marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[13]  A C Roberts,et al.  Performance norms for a rhesus monkey neuropsychological testing battery: acquisition and long-term performance. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  R. C. Newberry Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments , 1995 .

[15]  Dietmar Schroeder,et al.  Long-term decoding of movement force and direction with a wireless myoelectric implant. , 2016, Journal of neural engineering.

[16]  S. P. Wise,et al.  Set-related neuronal activity in the premotor cortex of rhesus monkeys: effects of changes in motor set , 1985, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  H. Buchanan-Smith,et al.  Is Mixed-Species Living Cognitively Enriching? Enclosure Use and Welfare in Two Captive Groups of Tufted Capuchins (Sapajus apella) and Squirrel Monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) , 2017 .

[18]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) complex learning skills reassessed , 2006, International Journal of Primatology.

[19]  J. Fagot,et al.  Relational matching in baboons (Papio papio) with reduced grouping requirements. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[20]  D J Nutt,et al.  Home cage presentation of complex discrimination tasks to marmosets and rhesus monkeys , 1999, Laboratory animals.

[21]  Stephanie Westendorff,et al.  The Cortical Timeline for Deciding on Reach Motor Goals , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  David A. Washburn,et al.  Video-task assessment of learning and memory in macaques (Macaca mulatta): effects of stimulus movement on performance. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[23]  J. Call,et al.  Monkeys and apes: are their cognitive skills really so different? , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[24]  R. Andersen,et al.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex , 1997, Nature.

[25]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Modulation of preparatory neuronal activity in dorsal premotor cortex due to stimulus-response compatibility. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  R. Hampton,et al.  Automated cognitive testing of monkeys in social groups yields results comparable to individual laboratory-based testing , 2013, Animal Cognition.

[27]  M. Bashaw,et al.  Maximizing the effectiveness of environmental enrichment: Suggestions from the experimental analysis of behavior , 2007 .

[28]  David A. Washburn,et al.  The NASA/LRC computerized test system , 1990, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[29]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis , 2007, Science.

[30]  E. Visalberghi,et al.  Identity concept learning in matching-to-sample tasks by tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[31]  M. Banks,et al.  Effects of environmental and pharmacological manipulations on a novel delayed nonmatching-to-sample ‘working memory’ procedure in unrestrained rhesus monkeys , 2015, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[32]  Mark H. Tuszynski,et al.  Age-related cognitive deficits in rhesus monkeys mirror human deficits on an automated test battery , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[33]  Alexander Gail,et al.  Planning Movements in Visual and Physical Space in Monkey Posterior Parietal Cortex. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  An automated system for positive reinforcement training of group-housed macaque monkeys at breeding and research facilities , 2017, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  P. Pierre,et al.  Moving evidence into practice: cost analysis and assessment of macaques’ sustained behavioral engagement with videogames and foraging devices , 2016, American journal of primatology.

[36]  Jack Bergman,et al.  A novel touch-sensitive apparatus for behavioral studies in unrestrained squirrel monkeys , 2012, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[37]  G. Sackett,et al.  A computer touch screen system and training procedure for use with primate infants: Results from pigtail monkeys (Macaca nemestrina). , 2008, Developmental psychobiology.

[38]  K. Grant,et al.  Ranking Cognitive Flexibility in a Group Setting of Rhesus Monkeys with a Set-Shifting Procedure , 2017, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[39]  Christian Klaes,et al.  Choosing Goals, Not Rules: Deciding among Rule-Based Action Plans , 2011, Neuron.

[40]  A. Gail,et al.  A cage-based training, cognitive testing and enrichment system optimized for rhesus macaques in neuroscience research , 2017, Behavior research methods.

[41]  Emily D. Klein,et al.  An efficient computerized testing method for the capuchin monkey (Cebus apella): Adaptation of the LRC-CTS to a socially housed nonhuman primate species , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[42]  J. Fagot,et al.  Automated testing of cognitive performance in monkeys: Use of a battery of computerized test systems by a troop of semi-free-ranging baboons (Papio papio) , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Jeffrey C. Erlich,et al.  Requirement of Prefrontal and Midbrain Regions for Rapid Executive Control of Behavior in the Rat , 2015, Neuron.

[44]  W. Schultz,et al.  Refinement of the use of food and fluid control as motivational tools for macaques used in behavioural neuroscience research: Report of a Working Group of the NC3Rs , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  J. McComas,et al.  Dynamic changes in reinforcer effectiveness: theoretical, methodological, and practical implications for applied research. , 2003, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[46]  H. Harlow,et al.  The formation of learning sets. , 1949, Psychological review.

[47]  J. Fagot,et al.  Automatic testing of cognitive performance in baboons maintained in social groups , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[48]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Multifocal Attention Filters Targets from Distracters within and beyond Primate MT Neurons' Receptive Field Boundaries , 2011, Neuron.