Eye movements elicited by transparent stimuli

A transparent motion condition occurs when two different motion vectors appear at the same region of an image. Such transparency during self-motion has shown demonstrable effects on perception and on the underlying neurophysiology in the cortical and subcortical structures of primates. Presumably such stimulus conditions also influence oculomotor behavior. We investigated smooth-pursuit performance, using a transparent stimulus consisting of two oppositely-moving patterns. We found slight reduction in the mean eye velocity tracking a transparent pattern, compared with that when tracking a unidirectional pattern. Additionally, we investigated the behavior of the optokinetic system to transparency, demonstrating that it elicits antagonistic optokinetic nystagmus, with distinctly reduced gain of the slow phases. Furthermore, we observed, during optokinetic stabilization of transparent stimuli, directional dominances demonstrating that subjects preferably followed one direction. Presenting a transparent stimulus with oppositely moving patterns and different velocities we found a general velocity dominance demonstrating that patterns with a certain velocity are preferred. Performing all experiments under dichoptic conditions produced results comparable with those found under transparent stimulus conditions.

[1]  P. Enoksson STUDIES IN OPTOKINETIC BINOCULAR RIVALRY WITH A NEW DEVICE * , 1968, Acta ophthalmologica.

[2]  E. L. Keller,et al.  Smooth-pursuit initiation in the presence of a textured background in monkey , 1986, Vision Research.

[3]  F A Miles,et al.  Effects of stationary textured backgrounds on the initiation of pursuit eye movements in monkeys. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  R A Andersen,et al.  The response of area MT and V1 neurons to transparent motion , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[5]  Robert Jefferson Snowden,et al.  Motions in orthogonal directions are mutually suppressive , 1989 .

[6]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Human optokinetic nystagmus in response to moving binocularly disparate stimuli , 1987, Vision Research.

[7]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. II. Differentiation of retinal from extraretinal inputs. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  P ENOKSSON,et al.  BINOCULAR RIVALRY AND MONOCULAR DOMINANCE STUDIED WITH OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS , 1963, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Binocular motion rivalry in macaque monkeys: Eye dominance and tracking eye movements , 1990, Vision Research.

[10]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Human smooth and saccadic eye movements during voluntary pursuit of different target motions on different backgrounds. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Quantitative analysis of visual receptive fields of neurons in nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal nucleus of the accessory optic tract in macaque monkey. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  Eileen Kowler,et al.  Voluntary selection of the target for smooth eye movement in the presence of superimposed, full-field stationary and moving stimuli , 1984, Vision Research.

[13]  B. Cohen,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the velocity characteristics of optokinetic nystagmus and optokinetic after‐nystagmus , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Mutual repulsion between moving visual targets. , 1979, Science.

[15]  P ENOKSSON,et al.  A METHOD FOR INVESTIGATION OF OCULAR DOMINANCE BASED ON OPTOKINETIC NYSTAGMUS , 1961, Acta ophthalmologica.

[16]  H. Komatsu,et al.  Relation of cortical areas MT and MST to pursuit eye movements. III. Interaction with full-field visual stimulation. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  R. Snowden Suppressive interactions between moving patterns: Role of velocity , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  P. Walker Binocular rivalry : Central or peripheral selective processes? , 1978 .

[19]  R. Blake A Neural Theory of Binocular Rivalry , 1989 .

[20]  A. Mood,et al.  The statistical sign test. , 1946, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[21]  L. Sachs,et al.  Statistische Auswertungsmethoden , 2005, Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde.

[22]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[23]  B Moulden,et al.  Thresholds for Movement Direction: Two Directions are Less Detectable than One , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[24]  B. Julesz,et al.  Cooperative phenomena in apparent movement perception of random-dot cinematograms , 1984, Vision Research.

[25]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception , 1973, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Robert Fox,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus as an objective indicator of binocular rivalry , 1975, Vision Research.

[27]  J. Outerbridge,et al.  Inter-saccadic interval analysis of optokinetic nystagmus. , 1974, Vision research.

[28]  I. Howard,et al.  Visual pursuit over textured backgrounds in different depth planes , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[29]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Responses of monkey nucleus of the optic tract neurons during pursuit and fixation , 1991, Neuroscience Research.

[30]  C Maioli,et al.  Optokinetic nystagmus: modeling the velocity storage mechanism , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[31]  Brian J. Murphy,et al.  Slow oculomotor control in the presence of moving backgrounds , 1975, Vision Research.