Neuromuscular biomechanical modeling to understand knee ligament loading.

PURPOSE This article examines our use of EMG-driven neuromuscular biomechanical models to study how muscles stabilize the knee. EMG can be used to establish which activation patterns are used by people for knee stabilization. However, it does not reveal the effectiveness of these patterns. The EMG-driven models provide quantitative comparisons of the effectiveness of the different knee-stabilizing activation patterns. METHODS Subjects performed static tasks and common sporting maneuvers that challenged knee joint stability. EMG, joint posture and motion, and external forces and moments were measured during these tasks. These data were used to calibrate the EMG-driven neuromuscular biomechanical model. We then used the model to predict the role of muscles in supporting varus and valgus moments at the knee. RESULTS We found specific muscle activation patterns to support varus and valgus moments. The most potent activation pattern to stabilize the knee is when the hamstrings or quadriceps are required to generate flexion or extension moments, respectively. The next most effective knee-stabilizing pattern is cocontraction of the hamstring and quadriceps. The small biarticular muscles at the knee provided the least support of varus and valgus moments. In the sporting tasks, sidestepping was found to place the anterior cruciate ligament at high risk of injury. We found that the muscles are the main defense against knee ligament injuries in these tasks. CONCLUSION Traditional biomechanical and neurophysiological methods have shown that there are specific activation patterns used to stabilize the knee. By also using the EMG-driven neuromuscular biomechanical model, we have shown how effective muscles are in stabilizing the knee. This modeling method provides a new tool to understand knee joint stabilization.