Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions

Attention is believed to be biased toward threatening objects or faces. Therefore, we tested whether angry face stimuli would capture attention even when they are irrelevant to the task. Observers searched for a neutral face with a tilted nose. On some trials, the target was shown together with an irrelevant angry or happy face and we measured the N2pc (an electrophysiological marker of attentional selectivity) to

[1]  Agnieszka Wykowska,et al.  Irrelevant Singletons in Visual Search Do Not Capture Attention but Can Produce Nonspatial Filtering Costs , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  C. Darwin The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[4]  G. Crombez,et al.  Competing for attentional priority: temporary goals versus threats. , 2013, Emotion.

[5]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[6]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[7]  J. Eastwood,et al.  Differential attentional guidance by unattended faces expressing positive and negative emotion , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  A. Calder,et al.  Configural coding of facial expressions: The impact of inversion and photographic negative , 2005 .

[9]  James Elder,et al.  The effect of contour closure on the rapid discrimination of two-dimensional shapes , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  O. Lipp,et al.  Visual search for schematic emotional faces: Angry faces are more than crosses , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[11]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Attentional effects of negative faces: Top-down contingent or involuntary? , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  L. Damjanovic,et al.  The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[13]  Adam K. Anderson,et al.  Affect-biased attention as emotion regulation , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Visual search for emotional expressions: Effect of stimulus set on anger and happiness superiority , 2016, Cognition & emotion.

[15]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Features and their configuration in face recognition , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[16]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Emotional triangles: A test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[17]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  In search of the emotional face: anger versus happiness superiority in visual search. , 2013, Emotion.

[18]  P. Lang,et al.  Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. , 2000, Journal of affective disorders.

[19]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Capture versus suppression of attention by salient singletons: Electrophysiological evidence for an automatic attend-to-me signal , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[21]  J. Wolfe,et al.  What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[22]  A. Young,et al.  Configural information in facial expression perception. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  O. Lipp,et al.  The effect of face inversion on the detection of emotional faces in visual search , 2015, Cognition & emotion.

[24]  R. West,et al.  ERP correlates of dual mechanisms of control in the counting Stroop task. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[25]  James Elder,et al.  A measure of closure , 1994, Vision Research.

[26]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Involuntary Attentional Capture is Determined by Task Set: Evidence from Event-related Brain Potentials , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[28]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Time Course of Attentional Bias in Anxiety: Emotion and Gender Specificity , 2022 .

[29]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  Christine L Larson,et al.  The shape of threat: simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. , 2007, Emotion.

[31]  Marina Schmid,et al.  An Introduction To The Event Related Potential Technique , 2016 .

[32]  Marianne Schmid Mast,et al.  Emotion Recognition: The Role of Featural and Configural Face Information , 2013, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[33]  Cody Ding,et al.  The “anger superiority effect” in the discrimination task is independent of temporal task demands , 2013, Neuroscience Letters.

[34]  D. Purcell,et al.  Still another confounded face in the crowd , 2010 .

[35]  Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression after involuntary capture of attention , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[37]  Lucy S. Petro,et al.  Dynamics of Visual Information Integration in the Brain for Categorizing Facial Expressions , 2007, Current Biology.

[38]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Attentional capture by masked colour singletons , 2010, Vision Research.

[39]  Joseph E LeDoux Emotional networks and motor control: a fearful view. , 1996, Progress in brain research.

[40]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  What causes the face inversion effect , 1995 .

[41]  Vincent Di Lollo,et al.  Electrophysiological Indices of Target and Distractor Processing in Visual Search , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[42]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[43]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Reward Changes Salience in Human Vision via the Anterior Cingulate , 2022 .

[44]  S. Luck An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique , 2005 .

[45]  G. Crombez,et al.  Does imminent threat capture and hold attention? , 2004, Emotion.

[46]  S J Luck,et al.  Spatial filtering during visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  Gernot Horstmann,et al.  Preattentive face processing: What do visual search experiments with schematic faces tell us? , 2007 .

[48]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The cost of visual filtering. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  S. Luck,et al.  A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[50]  H. Mayberg,et al.  An ERP study of the temporal course of the Stroop color-word interference effect , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  Anders Petersen,et al.  Attentional Capture by Salient Distractors during Visual Search Is Determined by Temporal Task Demands , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Senqing Qi,et al.  Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search , 2013, Brain Research.

[53]  Shwu-Lih Huang,et al.  Task-irrelevant angry faces capture attention in visual search while modulated by resources. , 2011, Emotion.

[54]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[55]  D. Purcell,et al.  Still another confounded face in the crowd , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[56]  A. Turken,et al.  Dissociation between conflict detection and error monitoring in the human anterior cingulate cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  T. Valentine Upside-down faces: a review of the effect of inversion upon face recognition. , 1988, British journal of psychology.

[58]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[59]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  P. Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect , 1976 .

[61]  G. Horstmann,et al.  Search asymmetries with real faces: testing the anger-superiority effect. , 2006, Emotion.

[62]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[63]  S. Baron-Cohen Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[64]  M. Eimer The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[65]  A. Ohman,et al.  The face in the crowd revisited: a threat advantage with schematic stimuli. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Daniel Lundqvist,et al.  Emotion regulates attention: The relation between facial configurations, facial emotion, and visual attention , 2005 .

[67]  P. Schyns,et al.  Show Me the Features! Understanding Recognition From the Use of Visual Information , 2002, Psychological science.

[68]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  The distractor positivity (Pd) signals lowering of attentional priority: evidence from event-related potentials and individual differences. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[69]  R. de Raedt,et al.  The influence of working memory on the anger superiority effect , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[70]  Iain D Gilchrist,et al.  The target velocity integration function for saccades. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[71]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Face Perception in the Mind’s Eye , 2011, Brain Topography.

[72]  Geert Crombez,et al.  Allocation of spatial attention to emotional stimuli depends upon arousal and not valence. , 2008, Emotion.

[73]  O. Lipp,et al.  No effect of inversion on attentional and affective processing of facial expressions. , 2009, Emotion.

[74]  W. Thompson,et al.  Visual search for schematic emotional faces risks perceptual confound , 2011, Cognition & emotion.

[75]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Attentional capture during visual search is attenuated by target predictability: evidence from the N2pc, Pd, and topographic segmentation. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[76]  Guy Wallis,et al.  The face-in-the-crowd effect: when angry faces are just cross(es). , 2011, Journal of vision.

[77]  Andrew W Young,et al.  The eyebrow frown: a salient social signal. , 2002, Emotion.

[78]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of face recognition in a flash: it's in the eyes , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[79]  Steven Todd,et al.  Attentional misguidance in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[80]  W. Sato,et al.  Emotional attention capture by facial expressions , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[81]  Axel Mecklinger,et al.  Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2002, Psychological science.

[82]  Fruzsina Soltész,et al.  Event-related potentials dissociate facilitation and interference effects in the numerical Stroop paradigm , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[83]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[84]  Mathias Weymar,et al.  The face is more than its parts — Brain dynamics of enhanced spatial attention to schematic threat , 2011, NeuroImage.

[85]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Mixed emotions: Holistic and analytic perception of facial expressions , 2010, Cognition & emotion.

[86]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Electrophysiological Evidence of the Capture of Visual Attention , 2013, J. Cogn. Neurosci..

[87]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces , 2017, Neuroscience Letters.

[88]  Steven J Luck,et al.  Active suppression of distractors that match the contents of visual working memory , 2011, Visual cognition.

[89]  David C. Zhu,et al.  Recognizing Threat: A Simple Geometric Shape Activates Neural Circuitry for Threat Detection , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[90]  Anna Schubö,et al.  You see what you have learned. Evidence for an interrelation of associative learning and visual selective attention. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[91]  S. Mineka,et al.  Fears, phobias, and preparedness: toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. , 2001, Psychological review.

[92]  M. Eimer,et al.  The Focus of Spatial Attention Determines the Number and Precision of Face Representations in Working Memory. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[93]  Nilli Lavie,et al.  Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces. , 2011, Emotion.

[94]  W. Sato,et al.  Detection of emotional facial expressions and anti-expressions , 2010 .

[95]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[96]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Perceptual grouping, not emotion, accounts for search asymmetries with schematic faces. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[97]  S. Kotz,et al.  ERP Evidence for a Sex-Specific Stroop Effect in Emotional Speech , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[98]  A. Strobel,et al.  Threatening shapes: The impact of simple geometric configurations on peripheral physiological markers , 2014, Physiology & Behavior.

[99]  G. Gendolla,et al.  Detecting emotional faces and features in a visual search paradigm: are faces special? , 2006, Emotion.

[100]  M. Herrmann,et al.  Early and late temporo-spatial effects of contextual interference during perception of facial affect. , 2009, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[101]  L. Leyman,et al.  The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces: A validation study , 2008 .

[102]  S. Gronlund,et al.  Top-down guidance in visual search for facial expressions , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[103]  L. Nummenmaa,et al.  Detection of emotional faces: salient physical features guide effective visual search. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[104]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[105]  Cody Ding,et al.  Value associations of emotional faces can modify the anger superiority effect: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 2014, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[106]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[107]  Stefanie I. Becker,et al.  Of toothy grins and angry snarls--open mouth displays contribute to efficiency gains in search for emotional faces. , 2012, Journal of vision.