A process proof test for model concepts: Modelling the meso-scale

Abstract In hydrological modelling the use of detailed soil data is sometimes troublesome, since often these data are hard to obtain and, if available at all, difficult to interpret and process in a way that makes them meaningful for the model at hand. Intuitively the understanding and mapping of dominant runoff processes in the soil show high potential for improving hydrological models. In this study a labour-intensive methodology to assess dominant runoff processes is simplified in such a way that detailed soil maps are no longer needed. Nonetheless, there is an ongoing debate on how to integrate this type of information in hydrological models. In this study, dominant runoff processes (DRP) are mapped for meso-scale basins using the permeability of the substratum, land use information and the slope in a GIS. During a field campaign the processes are validated and for each DRP assumptions are made concerning their water storage capacity. The latter is done by means of combining soil data obtained during the field campaign with soil data obtained from the literature. Second, several parsimoniously parameterized conceptual hydrological models are used that incorporate certain aspects of the DRP. The result of these models are compared with a benchmark model in which the soil is represented as only one lumped parameter to test the contribution of the DRP in hydrological models. The proposed methodology is tested for 15 meso-scale river basins located in Luxembourg. The main goal of this study is to investigate if integrating dominant runoff processes, which have high information content concerning soil characteristics, with hydrological models allows the improvement of simulation results models with a view to regionalization and predictions in ungauged basins. The regionalization procedure gave no clear results. The calibration procedure and the well-mixed discharge signal of the calibration basins are considered major causes for this and it made the deconvolution of discharge signals of meso-scale basins problematic. From the results it is also suggested that DRP could very well display some sort of uniqueness of place, which was not foreseen in the methods from which they were derived. Furthermore, a strong seasonal influence on model performance was observed, implying a seasonal dependence of the DRP. When comparing the performance between the DRP models and the benchmark model no real distinction was found. To improve the performance of the DRP models, which are used in this study and also for then use of conceptual models in general, there is a need for an improved identification of the mechanisms that cause the different dominant runoff processes at the meso-scale. To achieve this, more orthogonal data could be of use for a better conceptualization of the DRPs. Then, models concepts should be adapted accordingly.

[1]  W. J. Shuttleworth,et al.  Parameter estimation of a land surface scheme using multicriteria methods , 1999 .

[2]  K. Beven Towards a coherent philosophy for modelling the environment , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[3]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Predicting the daily streamflow of ungauged catchments in S.E. Australia by regionalising the parameters of a lumped conceptual rainfall-runoff model , 1999 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Dalton Medal Lecture: How far can we go in distributed hydrological modelling? , 2001 .

[5]  Wolfgang-Albert Flügel,et al.  Delineating hydrological response units by geographical information system analyses for regional hydrological modelling using PRMS/MMS in the drainage basin of the River Bröl, Germany , 1995 .

[6]  S. Uhlenbrook,et al.  Hydrological process representation at the meso-scale: the potential of a distributed, conceptual catchment model , 2004 .

[7]  Gebhard Schüler,et al.  Identification of flood-generating forest areas and forestry measures for water retention , 2006 .

[8]  P. Lagacherie,et al.  Fuzzy k-means clustering of fields in an elementary catchment and extrapolation to a larger area , 1997 .

[9]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration , 2002 .

[10]  Patrick Matgen,et al.  The rivers are alive: on the potential for diatoms as a tracer of water source and hydrological connectivity , 2009 .

[11]  Keith Beven,et al.  Towards a coherent philosophy for environmental modelling. , 2002 .

[12]  Kellie B. Vaché,et al.  Gauging the ungauged basin: a top-down approach in a large semiarid watershed in China , 2008 .

[13]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Scale issues in hydrological modelling , 1995 .

[14]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  Equifinality, a blessing in disguise? , 2001 .

[15]  J. Melack,et al.  Understanding and modeling basin hydrology: interpreting the hydrogeological signature , 2005 .

[16]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Advances in the use of observed spatial patterns of catchment hydrological response , 2002 .

[17]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  Spatio-temporal variability of event runoff coefficients , 2006 .

[18]  R. Vogel,et al.  Regional calibration of a watershed model , 2000 .

[19]  J. Kalma,et al.  Model identification by space–time disaggregation: a case study from eastern Australia , 2002 .

[20]  C. Müller,et al.  Identification and regionalization of dominant runoff processes - a GIS-based and a statistical approach. , 2009 .

[21]  Anthony J. Jakeman,et al.  Predicting daily flows in ungauged catchments: model regionalization from catchment descriptors at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory, North Carolina , 2003 .

[22]  Göran Lindström,et al.  Development and test of the distributed HBV-96 hydrological model , 1997 .

[23]  Z. Kundzewicz Ecohydrology—seeking consensus on interpretation of the notion / Ecohydrologie—à la recherche d'un consensus sur l'interprétation de la notion , 2002 .

[24]  Felix Naef,et al.  A decision scheme to indicate dominant hydrological flow processes on temperate grassland , 2003 .

[25]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  ON THE REPRESENTATIVE ELEMENTARY AREA (REA) CONCEPT AND ITS UTILITY FOR DISTRIBUTED RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELLING , 1995 .

[26]  Hubert H. G. Savenije,et al.  A comparison of alternative multiobjective calibration strategies for hydrological modeling , 2007 .

[27]  RUDI VAN DEN BOS,et al.  Regional runoff prediction through aggregation of first-order hydrological process knowledge: a case study , 2006 .

[28]  Felix Naef,et al.  Identifying runoff processes on the plot and catchment scale , 2006 .

[29]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[30]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[31]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models , 2003 .