Reduced basis technique for calculating sensitivity coefficients of nonlinear structural response

An efficient reduced basis technique is presented for calculating the sensitivity of nonlinear structural response to variations in the design variables. The structure is discretized by using two-field mixed finite element models. The vector of structural response and its sensitivity coefficients (derivatives with respect to design variables) are each expressed as a linear combination of a small number of basis (or global approximation) vectors. The Bubnov-Galerkin technique is then used to approximate each of the finite element equations governing the response and the sensitivity coefficients by a small number of algebraic equations in the amplitudes of these vectors. The path derivatives (derivatives of the response vector with respect to path parameters, e.g., load parameters) are used as basis vectors for approximating the response. A combination of the path derivatives and their derivatives with respect to the design variables is used for approximating the sensitivity coefficients. The potential of the proposed technique is discussed and its effectiveness is demonstrated by means of numerical examples of laminated composite plates subjected to mechanical and thermal loads.

[1]  M. Kamat Design Sensitivity Analysis Of Nonlinear Structures Iii: Shape Variation Of Viscoplastic Structures , 1993 .

[2]  Raymond H. Plaut,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design of Nonlinear Beams and Plates , 1985 .

[3]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Recent advances in reduction methods for instability analysis of structures , 1983 .

[4]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Multiple‐parameter reduced basis technique for bifurcation and post‐buckling analyses of composite plates , 1983 .

[5]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis and optimization of nonlinear structuralresponse using incremental procedure , 1987 .

[6]  A. Noor Recent advances in reduction methods for nonlinear problems. [in structural mechanics , 1981 .

[7]  K. Choi,et al.  Equivalence of continuum and discrete methods of shape design sensitivity analysis , 1989 .

[8]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Symmetry considerations for anisotropic shells , 1976 .

[9]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Sensitivity of tire response to variations in material and geometric parameters , 1992 .

[10]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis , 1989 .

[11]  R. Haftka,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Discrete Structural Systems , 1986 .

[12]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  First- and Second-Order Sensitivity Analysis of Linear and Nonlinear Structures , 1986 .

[13]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Structural design sensitivity analysis of nonlinear response , 1985 .

[14]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Variational method for design sensitivity analysis in nonlinear structural mechanics , 1988 .

[15]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  A design sensitivity analysis principle and its implementation into ADIANA , 1989 .

[16]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear thermal systems , 1989 .

[17]  Robert B. Haber,et al.  Adjoint sensitivity analysis for nonlinear dynamic thermoelastic systems , 1991 .

[18]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  Mixed models and reduced/selective integration displacement models for nonlinear shell analysis , 1982 .

[19]  Creto Augusto Vidal,et al.  AN ADJOINT VARIABLE METHOD FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS OF NON-LINEAR ELASTIC SYSTEMS , 1991 .

[20]  Ahmed K. Noor,et al.  On making large nonlinear problems small , 1982 .