Effect of carcass suspension and cooking method on the palatability of three beef muscles as assessed by Korean and Australian consumers

A total of 36 steer carcasses (18 slaughtered in Australia and 18 slaughtered in Korea), where one side had been suspended by the hip (tenderstretch) and the other by the Achilles tendon were used to provide sensory and shear force samples from the Mm. triceps brachii, longissimus lumborum and semimembranosus. Sensory samples were cooked using grill (25 mm thick) and barbeque (BBQ, 4 mm thick) methods and served to 360 untrained Australian and 720 untrained Korean consumers. Australian consumers sensory tested grill and BBQ samples from Australian carcasses (216 samples), while Korean consumers sensory tested grill and BBQ samples from both Australian and Korean carcasses (a total of 432 samples). The three-way interaction between carcass suspension, cooking method and muscle was significant (P < 0.05) for tenderness, overall liking and a composite palatability score (MQ4), where the combination of BBQ cooking and hip suspension resulted in large increases in sensory scores for the M. semimembranosus. Variation in sensory scores and shear force are discussed in the context of possible interactions with cooking temperature. There was a significant (P < 0.05) first order interaction between consumer group and muscle for juiciness score. Consumer effects were significant (P < 0.05) for all sensory scores, being largest for juiciness (~8 sensory units), like flavour and overall liking (both ~6 sensory units) and MQ4 (~5 sensory units) scores, with the smallest effect on tenderness (~2 sensory units).

[1]  R. Polkinghorne,et al.  Consumer assessment of eating quality – development of protocols for Meat Standards Australia (MSA) testing , 2008 .

[2]  J. Thompson,et al.  Evolution of the Meat Standards Australia (MSA) beef grading system , 2008 .

[3]  Soohyun Cho,et al.  Beef quality grades as determined by Korean and Australian consumers , 2008 .

[4]  I. Hwang,et al.  Demographic and design effects on beef sensory scores given by Korean and Australian consumers , 2008 .

[5]  G. Gardner,et al.  Genetic and environmental effects on the muscle structure response post-mortem. , 2006, Meat science.

[6]  J. Thompson.  The effects of marbling on flavour and juiciness scores of cooked beef, after adjusting to a constant tenderness , 2004 .

[7]  A P Moloney,et al.  Decreasing variation in the eating quality of beef through homogenous pre- and post-slaughter management. , 2004, Meat science.

[8]  E S Lee,et al.  Effects of quality grade on the chemical, physical and sensory characteristics of Hanwoo (Korean native cattle) beef. , 2003, Meat science.

[9]  John Thompson,et al.  Managing meat tenderness. , 2002, Meat science.

[10]  J. O. Reagan,et al.  Beef customer satisfaction: factors affecting consumer evaluations of clod steaks. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[11]  O. Sørheim,et al.  Influence of beef carcass stretching and chilling rate on tenderness of m. longissimus dorsi. , 2001, Meat science.

[12]  S. Shackelford,et al.  Relationship of beef longissimus tenderness classes to tenderness of gluteus medius, semimembranosus, and biceps femoris. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[13]  J. D. Tatum,et al.  An evaluation of current and alternative systems for quality grading carcasses of mature slaughter cows. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[14]  F. Smulders,et al.  Effect of pelvic suspension and cooking temperature on the tenderness of electrically stimulated and aged beef, assessed with shear and compression tests. , 1998, Meat science.

[15]  R. Field,et al.  Tenderness variation among loin steaks from A and C maturity carcasses of heifers similar in chronological age. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[16]  E. Tornberg.  Biophysical aspects of meat tenderness. , 1996, Meat science.

[17]  B. C. Breidenstein,et al.  Muscle Foods: Meat Poultry and Seafood Technology , 1994 .

[18]  H. Cross,et al.  USDA MATURITY INDICES AND PALATABILITY OF BEEF RIB STEAKS1 , 1988 .

[19]  E. Kirkegaard,et al.  Tenderness of pork muscles as influenced by chilling rate and altered carcass suspension. , 1987, Meat science.

[20]  G. W. Davis,et al.  Relationship of USDA Maturity Groups to Palatability of Cooked Beef , 1982 .

[21]  T. R. Dutson,et al.  Comparison of methods for measuring sarcomere length in beef semitendinosus muscle. , 1981, Meat science.

[22]  P. V. Harris,et al.  Influence of animal age on the tenderness of beef: Muscle differences. , 1978, Meat science.

[23]  P. V. Harris,et al.  POSSIBLE RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN SHEAR, TENSILE, AND ADHESION PROPERTIES OF MEAT AND MEAT STRUCTURE , 1975 .

[24]  J. Romans.  The Meat We Eat , 1974 .

[25]  H. Fitzhugh,et al.  EFFECT OF CARCASS SUSPENSION METHOD ON SENSORY PANEL SCORES FOR SOME MAJOR BOVINE MUSCLES , 1973 .

[26]  H. Fitzhugh,et al.  EFFECT OF CARCASS SUSPENSION ON SARCOMERE LENGTH AND SHEAR FORCE OF SOME MAJOR BOVINE MUSCLES , 1972 .

[27]  W. L. Tucker,et al.  INFLUENCE OF CARCASS MATURITY AND MARBLING ON THE PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF BEEF. I. PALATABILITY, FIBER DIAMETER AND PROXIMATE ANALYSIS. , 1965, Journal of animal science.