An Examination of the Use of Peer Rating for Formative Assessment in the Context of the Theory of Consumption Values

The following paper discusses the use of peer rating as a learning tool in a coursework Masters programme at an Australian, east coast university. The use of peer assessment is discussed and the benefits of peer rating developed. The business theory of consumption values is then introduced. The use of peer rating is examined in the context of consumption values and evaluated by use of focus group. Conclusions suggest that the use of peer rating results in improved student motivation and learning but can be stressful for participants. Areas for future research are identified.

[1]  Stuart A. Fry.  IMPLEMENTATION AND EVALUATION OF PEER MARKING IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 1990 .

[2]  P. Orsmond,et al.  The Use of Student Derived Marking Criteria in Peer and Self-assessment , 2000 .

[3]  Merryl Hammond,et al.  Self-Directed Learning: Critical Practice , 1991 .

[4]  Judy Goldfinch,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PEER ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE FOR OBTAINING INDIVIDUAL MARKS ON A GROUP PROJECT , 1990 .

[5]  Judy Goldfinch,et al.  Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects , 1994 .

[6]  David Boud,et al.  THE ROLE OF SELF‐ASSESSMENT IN STUDENT GRADING , 1989 .

[7]  David Boud,et al.  Self and peer assessment in professional education: a preliminary study , 1979 .

[8]  Pamela L. Alreck,et al.  The Survey Research Handbook , 1984 .

[9]  Jeffrey S. Kane,et al.  Methods of peer assessment. , 1978 .

[10]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values , 1991 .

[11]  Hugh Somervell,et al.  Issues in Assessment, Enterprise and Higher Education: the case for self‐peer and collaborative assessment , 1993 .

[12]  Paul E. Spector.  Summated rating scale construction , 1991 .

[13]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing , 1983 .

[14]  Shirley Earl,et al.  STAFF AND PEER ASSESSMENT ‐ MEASURING AN INDIVIDUAL'S CONTRIBUTION TO GROUP PERFORMANCE , 1986 .

[15]  Barbara L. Gross,et al.  Consumption Values and Market Choices: Theory and Applications , 1991 .

[16]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  PRODUCT COMPARISONS AND PROCESS BENEFITS OF COLLABORATIVE PEER GROUP AND SELF ASSESSMENTS , 1986 .

[17]  R. Carswell,et al.  Self-evaluation for nursing students. , 1990, Nursing outlook.

[18]  Harry E. Roadman.  An industrial use of peer ratings. , 1964 .

[19]  J. MacAlpine,et al.  Improving and Encouraging Peer Assessment of Student Presentations , 1999 .

[20]  Judith L. Osborne,et al.  Integrating Student and Peer Evaluation of Teaching , 1998 .

[21]  Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al.  Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction , 1986 .

[22]  Winnie Cheng,et al.  Peer and Teacher Assessment of the Oral and Written Tasks of a Group Project , 1999 .

[23]  M. Cosser,et al.  Towards the design of a system of peer review of teaching for the advancement of the individual within the university , 1998 .

[24]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Self and peer appraisal in higher education , 1994 .

[25]  Mark Freeman,et al.  Peer Assessment by Groups of Group Work , 1995 .

[26]  E. Patterson,et al.  The analysis and application of peer assessment in nurse education, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder. , 1996, Nurse education today.

[27]  Eira Williams,et al.  STUDENT ATTITUDES TOWARDS APPROACHES TO LEARNING AND ASSESSMENT , 1992 .

[28]  David Kember,et al.  Peer Assessment of an Individual ‘s Contribution to a Group Project , 1993 .

[29]  Nancy Falchikov,et al.  Detecting Gender Bias in Peer Marking of Students' Group Process Work. , 1997 .

[30]  I. E. Hughes,et al.  Staff and peer-group assessment of oral communication skills , 1993 .

[31]  James Dalziel,et al.  Using Marks to Assess Student Performance, some problems and alternatives , 1998 .

[32]  R. Murphy,et al.  The changing face of educational assessment , 1988 .