Scanpath analysis of expertise and culture in teacher gaze in real-world classrooms

Humans are born to learn by understanding where adults look. This is likely to extend into the classroom, making teacher gaze an important topic for study. Expert teacher gaze has mainly been investigated in the laboratory, and has focused mostly on one cognitive process: teacher attentional (i.e., information-seeking) gaze. No known research has made direct cultural comparisons of teacher gaze or successfully found expert–novice differences outside Western settings. Accordingly, we conducted a real-world study of expert teacher gaze across two cultural settings, exploring communicative (i.e., information-giving) as well as attentional gaze. Forty secondary school teachers wore eye-tracking glasses, with 20 teachers (10 expert; 10 novice) from the UK and 20 teachers (10 expert; 10 novice) from Hong Kong. We used a novel eye-tracking scanpath analysis to ascertain the importance of expertise and culture, individually and as a combination. Attentional teacher scanpaths were significantly more similar within than across expertise and expertise + culture sub-groups; communicative scanpaths were significantly more similar within than across expertise and culture. Detailed analysis suggests that (1) expert teachers refer back to students constantly through focused gaze during both attentional and communicative gaze and that (2) expert teachers in Hong Kong scan students more than experts do in the UK.

[1]  William H. Schmidt,et al.  General Pedagogical Knowledge of Future Middle School Teachers: On the Complex Ecology of Teacher Education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan , 2011 .

[2]  Halszka Jarodzka,et al.  Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes , 2016 .

[3]  L. Stark,et al.  Spontaneous Eye Movements During Visual Imagery Reflect the Content of the Visual Scene , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  L. Arnold.  Dialogic Embodied Action: Using Gesture to Organize Sequence and Participation in Instructional Interaction , 2012 .

[5]  E. Reingold,et al.  Eye movements and visual expertise in chess and medicine , 2011 .

[6]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Brain activity modulation during the production of imperative and declarative pointing , 2015, NeuroImage.

[7]  Hilary Hollingsworth.  Cultural differences in teaching and learning , 2013 .

[8]  Gene P. Sackett,et al.  Analysis of sequential social interaction data: Some issues, recent developments, and a causal inference model. , 1987 .

[9]  Dean E. Hewes.  The sequential analysis of social interaction , 1979 .

[10]  Julie E. Boland,et al.  Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Wmg Wim Jochems,et al.  First steps into understanding teachers' visual perception of classroom events. , 2014 .

[12]  K. Miller,et al.  Where Low and High Inference Data Converge: Validation of CLASS Assessment of Mathematics Instruction Using Mobile Eye Tracking with Expert and Novice Teachers , 2015, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

[13]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers , 2004 .

[14]  F. Paas,et al.  Uncovering the problem-solving process: cued retrospective reporting versus concurrent and retrospective reporting. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Natural gaze signaling in a social context , 2014 .

[16]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Gaze Following in Newborns , 2004 .

[17]  David McNeill,et al.  Gesture, Gaze, and Ground , 2005, MLMI.

[18]  N. Zhou,et al.  The Chinese classroom paradox: A cross-cultural comparison of teacher controlling behaviors. , 2012 .

[19]  G. Csibra,et al.  Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals , 2008, Current Biology.

[20]  Andreas Bartels,et al.  Rivalry between afterimages and real images: the influence of the percept and the eye. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[21]  Robert C. Pianta,et al.  Teacher-Student Relationships and Engagement: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Improving the Capacity of Classroom Interactions , 2012 .

[22]  M. Tomasello.  Culture and Cognitive Development , 2000 .

[23]  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE What and When of Cognitive Aging , 2008 .

[24]  Philip Smith.  Roger Bakeman John M. Gottman , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[25]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[26]  Zuzana Wozniaková.  Different approaches to the Czech and Chinese university students in Business Economics: A teaching experience , 2016 .

[27]  Kasey C. Soska,et al.  Head-mounted eye tracking: a new method to describe infant looking. , 2011, Child development.

[28]  Bruce L Sherin,et al.  Common sense clarified: The role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving , 2006 .

[29]  T. Foulsham,et al.  Comparing scanpaths during scene encoding and recognition : A multi-dimensional approach , 2012 .

[30]  T. Foulsham,et al.  What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[31]  G. Underwood,et al.  Domain knowledge moderates the influence of visual saliency in scene recognition. , 2009, British journal of psychology.

[32]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[33]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Is there an innate gaze module? Evidence from human neonates , 2000 .

[34]  John R. Searle,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1970 .

[35]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[36]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Eye contact detection in humans from birth , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  Social eye gaze modulates processing of speech and co-speech gesture , 2014, Cognition.

[38]  Paul Cobb,et al.  A cross-cultural investigation into the development of place-value concepts of children in Taiwan and the United States , 1995 .

[39]  F. Leung.  What can and should we learn from international studies of mathematics achievement? , 2014, Mathematics Education Research Journal.

[40]  Michelene T.H. Chi,et al.  EXPERTISE , 2009, Palliative and Supportive Care.

[41]  Rebecca M Foerster,et al.  Saccadic eye movements in a high-speed bimanual stacking task: changes of attentional control during learning and automatization. , 2011, Journal of vision.

[42]  N. Sebanz,et al.  (How) observed eye-contact modulates gaze following. An fMRI study , 2016, Cognitive neuroscience.

[43]  D. Berliner.  Learning about and learning from expert teachers , 2001 .

[44]  M. Tomasello,et al.  Reliance on head versus eyes in the gaze following of great apes and human infants: the cooperative eye hypothesis. , 2007, Journal of human evolution.

[45]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[46]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Communication via Pointing , 2011, PloS one.

[47]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  The Equivalence of Weighted Kappa and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient as Measures of Reliability , 1973 .

[48]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy , 2010 .

[49]  Sung Hyeon Cheon,et al.  A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students' amotivation , 2015 .

[50]  T. Foulsham,et al.  The influence of visual saliency on fixation patterns in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[51]  S. Baron-Cohen.  The Eye Direction Detector (EDD) and the Shared Attention Mechanism (SAM): Two cases for evolutionar , 1995 .

[52]  Laura M. Stough,et al.  Identifying Teacher Expertise: An Examination of Researchers' Decision Making , 2005 .

[53]  Fernand Gobet,et al.  Measuring Chess Experts' Single-Use Sequence Knowledge: An Archival Study of Departure from ‘Theoretical’ Openings , 2011, PloS one.

[54]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Blueprints for complex learning: The 4C/ID-model , 2002 .

[55]  J. Bartko,et al.  On Various Intraclass Correlation Reliability Coefficients , 1976 .

[56]  R. Klassen,et al.  Are you looking to teach? : Cultural, temporal and dynamic insights into expert teacher gaze , 2017 .

[57]  J. Hietanen,et al.  Attention to Eye Contact in the West and East: Autonomic Responses and Evaluative Ratings , 2013, PloS one.

[58]  G. Leinhardt.  Development of an Expert Explanation: An Analysis of a Sequence of Subtraction Lessons , 1987, Knowing, Learning, and Instruction.

[59]  Hilde Haider,et al.  Are strategy shifts caused by data-driven processes or by voluntary processes? , 2005, Consciousness and Cognition.

[60]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The development of adaptive competence: Why cultural psychology is necessary and not just nice , 2014 .

[61]  Li‐fang Zhang,et al.  Preferences in teaching styles among Hong Kong and US university students , 2005 .

[62]  Yun Choi,et al.  “Starkfest” Vision and Clinic Science Special Issue: String Editing Analysis of Human Visual Search , 1995 .

[63]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.10 October 2005 The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception , 2022 .

[64]  Steven E. Stemler,et al.  The Socially Skilled Teacher and the Development of Tacit Knowledge. , 2011 .

[65]  L W Stark,et al.  String editing analysis of human visual search. , 1995, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[66]  Andrew Kennedy,et al.  The use of eye-tracking to explore social difficulties in cognitively able students with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot investigation , 2015, Autism : the international journal of research and practice.

[67]  Renée M. Casbergue,et al.  Evolution of Novice through Expert Teachers' Recall: Implications for Effective Reflection on Practice. , 1997 .

[68]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[69]  Joseph A. Horvath,et al.  A Prototype View of Expert Teaching , 1995 .

[70]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Cognitive Load and Classroom Teaching: The Double-Edged Sword of Automaticity , 2007 .

[71]  Vladimir I. Levenshtein,et al.  Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals , 1965 .

[72]  Frederick K. S. Leung,et al.  The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong and London , 1995 .

[73]  H. Jarodzka,et al.  Keeping an Eye on Learning , 2015 .

[74]  Alan Kingstone,et al.  Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  David R. Wozny,et al.  Human trimodal perception follows optimal statistical inference. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[76]  den Pj Perry Brok,et al.  Teacher–Student Relationships and Student Achievement , 2016 .

[77]  C. Frith,et al.  Mechanisms of social cognition. , 2012, Annual review of psychology.

[78]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[79]  Li‐fang Zhang.  Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China , 2006 .

[80]  J. Henderson.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[81]  Shoji Itakura,et al.  Gaze Display When Thinking Depends on Culture and Context , 2008 .