Insulin Sensitivity Index-Based Optimization of Insulin to Carbohydrate Ratio: In Silico Study Shows Efficacious Protection Against Hypoglycemic Events Caused by Suboptimal Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM The insulin to carbohydrate ratio (CR) is a parameter used by patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to calculate the premeal insulin bolus. Usually, it is estimated by the physician based on patient diary, but modern diabetes technologies, such as subcutaneous glucose sensing (continuous glucose monitoring, CGM) and insulin delivery (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion, CSII) systems, can provide important information for its optimization. In this study, a method for CR optimization based on CGM and CSII data is presented and its efficacy and robustness tested in several in silico scenarios, with the primary aim of increasing protection against hypoglycemia. METHODS The method is based on a validated index of insulin sensitivity calculated from sensor and pump data (SISP), area under CGM and CSII curves. The efficacy and robustness of the method are tested in silico using the University of Virginia/Padova T1D simulator, in several suboptimal therapy scenarios: with nominal CR variation, over/underestimation of meal size or suboptimal basal insulin infusion. Simulated CGM and CSII data were used to calculate the optimal CR. The same scenarios were then repeated using the estimated CR and glycemic control was compared. RESULTS The optimized CR was efficacious in protecting against hypoglycemic events caused by suboptimal therapy. The method was also robust to possible error in carbohydrate count and suboptimal basal insulin infusion. CONCLUSIONS A novel method for CR optimization in T1D, implementable in daily life using CGM and CSII data, is proposed. The method can be used both in open- and closed-loop insulin therapy.

[1]  G. Steil,et al.  Impact of Fat, Protein, and Glycemic Index on Postprandial Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: Implications for Intensive Diabetes Management in the Continuous Glucose Monitoring Era , 2015, Diabetes Care.

[2]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  Method for automatic adjustment of an insulin bolus calculator: In silico robustness evaluation under intra-day variability , 2015, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[3]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Minimal model estimation of glucose absorption and insulin sensitivity from oral test: validation with a tracer method. , 2004, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[4]  Johnny Ludvigsson,et al.  Continuous subcutaneous glucose monitoring improved metabolic control in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: a controlled crossover study. , 2003, Pediatrics.

[5]  C. Cobelli,et al.  In Silico Preclinical Trials: A Proof of Concept in Closed-Loop Control of Type 1 Diabetes , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[6]  T. Bailey,et al.  Guidelines for Optimal Bolus Calculator Settings in Adults , 2011, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[7]  Christofer Toumazou,et al.  Advanced Insulin Bolus Advisor Based on Run-To-Run Control and Case-Based Reasoning , 2015, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[8]  FacchinettiAndrea,et al.  Retrofitting of continuous glucose monitoring traces allows more accurate assessment of glucose control in outpatient studies. , 2015 .

[9]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Quantitative Estimation of Insulin Sensitivity in Type 1 Diabetic Subjects Wearing a Sensor-Augmented Insulin Pump , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[10]  T. Bailey,et al.  Clinical Accuracy of a Continuous Glucose Monitoring System With an Advanced Algorithm , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[11]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Outcome Measures for Artificial Pancreas Clinical Trials: A Consensus Report , 2016, Diabetes Care.

[12]  Giovanni Sparacino,et al.  Improving Accuracy and Precision of Glucose Sensor Profiles: Retrospective Fitting by Constrained Deconvolution , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  F. Kaufman,et al.  A pilot study of the continuous glucose monitoring system: clinical decisions and glycemic control after its use in pediatric type 1 diabetic subjects. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[14]  P. Davidson,et al.  Analysis of guidelines for basal-bolus insulin dosing: basal insulin, correction factor, and carbohydrate-to-insulin ratio. , 2008, Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

[15]  A. King,et al.  A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy. , 2003, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[16]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Diurnal Pattern of Insulin Action in Type 1 Diabetes , 2013, Diabetes.

[17]  Howard C. Zisser,et al.  Calculating the insulin to carbohydrate ratio using the hyperinsulinaemic‐euglycaemic clamp—a novel use for a proven technique , 2007, Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews.

[18]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Twelve-Week 24/7 Ambulatory Artificial Pancreas With Weekly Adaptation of Insulin Delivery Settings: Effect on Hemoglobin A1c and Hypoglycemia , 2017, Diabetes Care.

[19]  Marco Forgione,et al.  Run-to-Run Tuning of Model Predictive Control for Type 1 Diabetes Subjects: In Silico Trial , 2009, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[20]  David C Klonoff,et al.  The current status of bolus calculator decision-support software. , 2012, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[21]  C. Cobelli,et al.  The UVA/PADOVA Type 1 Diabetes Simulator , 2014, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[22]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Adjustment of Open-Loop Settings to Improve Closed-Loop Results in Type 1 Diabetes: A Multicenter Randomized Trial. , 2015, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[23]  John Walsh,et al.  Guidelines for Insulin Dosing in Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Using New Formulas from a Retrospective Study of Individuals with Optimal Glucose Levels , 2010, Journal of diabetes science and technology.

[24]  W. Tamborlane,et al.  Limitations of conventional methods of self-monitoring of blood glucose: lessons learned from 3 days of continuous glucose sensing in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes. , 2001, Diabetes care.

[25]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Insulin Secretion, Insulin Action, Glucose Effectiveness, and Postprandial Glucose Metabolism , 2009, Diabetes Care.

[26]  C Cobelli,et al.  Minimal model assessment of hepatic insulin extraction during an oral test from standard insulin kinetic parameters. , 2009, American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism.

[27]  Eyal Dassau,et al.  Bolus calculator: a review of four "smart" insulin pumps. , 2008, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[28]  A. King,et al.  A Prospective Evaluation of Insulin Dosing Recommendations in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes at near Normal Glucose Control: Basal Dosing , 2007, Journal of diabetes science and technology.