Effect of a new desensitizing material on human dentin permeability.

[1]  R. P. Rusin,et al.  Long-term adhesion and mechanism of bonding of a paste-liquid resin-modified glass-ionomer. , 2009, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  S. Belli,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of four self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[3]  I. About,et al.  Evaluation of a natural resin-based new material (Shellac F) as a potential desensitizing agent. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  B. Matthews,et al.  Pain and the rate of dentinal fluid flow produced by hydrostatic pressure stimulation of exposed dentine in man. , 2007, Archives of oral biology.

[5]  F. Tay,et al.  Effect of simulated pulpal pressure on dentin permeability and adhesion of self-etch adhesives. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  P. Spencer,et al.  Chemical profile of adhesive/caries-affected dentin interfaces using Raman microspectroscopy. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[7]  D. Pashley,et al.  Personal Reflections on a Sensitive Subject , 2007, Journal of dental research.

[8]  J. Frencken,et al.  Comparison between effectiveness of a low-viscosity glass ionomer and a resin-based glutaraldehyde containing primer in treating dentine hypersensitivity--a 25.2-month evaluation. , 2007, Journal of dentistry.

[9]  R. Orchardson,et al.  Managing dentin hypersensitivity. , 2006, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  P. Spencer,et al.  Micro-Raman imaging analysis of monomer/mineral distribution in intertubular region of adhesive/dentin interfaces. , 2006, Journal of biomedical optics.

[11]  J. M. ten Cate,et al.  Effect of Calcium Glycerophosphate on Demineralization in an in vitro Biofilm Model , 2006, Caries Research.

[12]  J. Hodges,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass-ionomer liner for cervical dentin hypersensitivity treatment. , 2006, American journal of dentistry.

[13]  N. King,et al.  Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerisation. II. Differential permeability reduction with an oxalate desensitiser. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[14]  Francesca Antoniolli,et al.  Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. , 2005, European journal of oral sciences.

[15]  J. C. Pereira,et al.  Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments--an in vitro study. , 2005, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[16]  G. Grégoire,et al.  Effect of self-etching adhesives on dentin permeability in a fluid flow model. , 2005, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  P. Wesselink,et al.  Effect of dentin perfusion on the sealing ability and microtensile bond strengths of a total-etch versus an all-in-one adhesive. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  D. Pashley,et al.  In vitro evaporative vs. convective water flux across human dentin before and after conditioning and placement of glass-ionomer cements. , 2004, American journal of dentistry.

[19]  P. Spencer,et al.  Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[20]  M. Addy,et al.  A cross-sectional study of dentine hypersensitivity. , 2002, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[21]  M. Addy.  Dentine hypersensitivity: New perspectives on an old problem , 2002 .

[22]  D. McComb,et al.  A clinical comparison of glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and resin composite restorations in the treatment of cervical caries in xerostomic head and neck radiation patients. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[23]  G. Christensen.  Preventing postoperative tooth sensitivity in class I, II and V restorations. , 2002, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[24]  Yong Wang,et al.  Quantifying adhesive penetration in adhesive/dentin interface using confocal Raman microspectroscopy. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  D. Dawson,et al.  Effect of desensitizing agents on dentin permeability and dentin tubule occlusion. , 2002, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[26]  P. Wesselink,et al.  The influence of resin composite and bonded amalgam restorations on dentine permeability in Class II cavities in vitro. , 2001, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  J. C. Pereira,et al.  The use of oxalate to reduce dentin permeability under adhesive restorations. , 2001, American journal of dentistry.

[28]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[29]  A. Segura,et al.  Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[30]  K. Fox,et al.  A fluid filtration and clearing technique to assess microleakage associated with three dentine bonding systems. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[31]  J. Déjou,et al.  Effects of desensitizing agents on human dentin permeability. , 1998, American journal of dentistry.

[32]  D. Pashley,et al.  The effects of Pain-Free Desensitizer on dentine permeability and tubule occlusion over time, in vitro. , 1998, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[33]  H. Newman,et al.  The Dentin Disc Surface: A Plausible Model for Dentin Physiology and Dentin Sensitivity Evaluation , 1997, Advances in dental research.

[34]  P. Schupbach,et al.  Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. , 1997, European journal of oral sciences.

[35]  D. Pashley,et al.  Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[36]  P. McCusker,et al.  Prevalence of dentine hypersensitivity in a general dental population. , 1997, Journal of the Irish Dental Association.

[37]  A. Versluis,et al.  Inhibitive effect of a resin-modified glass ionomer cement on remote enamel artificial caries. , 1997, Caries research.

[38]  K. Titley,et al.  SEM observations of the reactions of the components of a light-activated glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement on bovine dentine. , 1996, Journal of dentistry.

[39]  W. G. Matthews,et al.  Fluid shifts across human dentine in vitro in response to hydrodynamic stimuli. , 1996, Archives of oral biology.

[40]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. , 1995, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  J. M. Cate,et al.  Hypermineralization of Dentinal Lesions Adjacent to Glass-ionomer Cement Restorations , 1995 .

[42]  D. Pashley,et al.  Bonding mechanism of VariGlass to dentin. , 1995, American journal of dentistry.

[43]  D. Pashley,et al.  Permeability and microleakage of Class II resin composite restorations. , 1994, Journal of dentistry.

[44]  R. Orchardson.  Clinical measurement of hypersensitive dentine. , 1993, International endodontic journal.

[45]  E. K. Hansen.  Dentin hypersensitivity treated with a fluoride-containing varnish or a light-cured glass-ionomer liner. , 1992, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[46]  N. McIntyre,et al.  Studies on the Adhesion of Glass-ionomer Cements to Dentin , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[47]  D. Pashley,et al.  Relationship between bond strength and microleakage measured in the same Class I restorations. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[48]  M. Tyas,et al.  Cariostatic effect of glass ionomer cement: a five-year clinical study. , 1991, Australian dental journal.

[49]  S. Mitra.  In vitro Fluoride Release from a Light-cured Glass-ionomer Liner/Base , 1991, Journal of dentistry research.

[50]  Rosenthal Mw.  Historic review of the management of tooth hypersensitivity. , 1990 .

[51]  C. Flaitz,et al.  Secondary caries formation in vitro around glass ionomer restorations. , 1986, Quintessence international.

[52]  D. Pashley.  Dentin permeability, dentin sensitivity, and treatment through tubule occlusion. , 1986, Journal of endodontics.

[53]  M. Naylor,et al.  A four-year clinical study to determine the caries-inhibiting effect of calcium glycerophosphate and sodium fluoride in calcium carbonate base dentifrices containing sodium monofluorophosphate. , 1983, Caries research.

[54]  D. Pashley,et al.  Effects of the degree of tubule occlusion on the permeability of human dentine in vitro. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[55]  T. Grenby,et al.  Dental caries in laboratory rats from breakfast cereals and its control by a calcium glycerophosphate additive. , 1978, Archives of oral biology.

[56]  R. Pianotti,et al.  Cariostatic Activity of Calcium Glycerophosphate in Hamsters: Topical Vs Dietary Administration , 1976, Journal of dentistry research.

[57]  T. Grenby.  Trials of three Organic Phosphorus-Containing Compounds as Protective Agents Against Dental Caries in Rats , 1973, Journal of dental research.

[58]  M. Brännström,et al.  The hydrodynamics of the dentine; its possible relationship to dentinal pain. , 1972, International dental journal.

[59]  B. Matthews.  Sensory Mechanisms in Dentine , 1972, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[60]  M. Brännström,et al.  Sensitivity of dentine. , 1966, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[61]  A. Gysi,et al.  An attempt to explain the sensitiveness of dentine , 1900 .