Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea

An extensive series of two-speaker and four-speaker playback experiments using synthetic advertisement calls identified acoustic criteria that may be used by females of the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea, in choosing a mate. At a sound pressure level (SPL) of 75 dB (decibels re 20 μPa) females preferred signals which had a low-frequency spectral peak in the range 0·8–1·0 kHz and a high-frequency spectral peak in the range 2·4–3·6 kHz. Some frequency preferences were reduced or abolished by changing the absolute or relative SPLs of the experimental stimuli. Frequency selectivity in the low-frequency range decreased with playback level; selectivity in the high-frequency range increased with playback level. Females were less selective with respect to variation of the low-frequency peak in four-speaker experiments than in two-speaker experiments. Frequency preferences were independent of female body size. Females responded selectively to signals that differed in call duration and relative SPL; some preferences depended on absolute SPL. Females preferred signals with higher (15–100%) than average repetition rates to those with average rates, but did not respond at all to calls repeated at about four times the normal rate. These results are discussed in terms of current knowledge on auditory physiology and recent data on patterns of call variation and mating success among male green treefrogs.

[1]  D. C. Forester,et al.  Sexual Selection in the Spring Peeper, Hyla Crucifer (Amphibia, Anura): Role of the Advertisement Call , 1985 .

[2]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  The Vocalizations of Some Hybrid Treefrogs: Acoustic and Behavioral Analyses , 1974 .

[3]  H. Gerhardt MATING CALL RECOGNITION IN THE GREEN TREEFROG {HYLA CINEREA): THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SOME FINE-TEMPORAL PROPERTIES , 1978 .

[4]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mating behaviour and male mating success in the green treefrog , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  B. Sullivan Sexual selection in Woodhouse's toad (Bufo woodhousei). II. Female choice , 1983, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  S. Jacobson REPRODUCTIVE BEHAVIOR AND MALE MATING SUCCESS IN TWO SPECIES OF GLASS FROGS (CENTROLENIDAE) , 1985 .

[7]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  The significance of some spectral features in mating call recognition in the green treefrog (Hyla cinerea). , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[8]  I. Straughan,et al.  Functional aspects of anuran middle ear structures. , 1974, The Journal of experimental biology.

[9]  D. Rubenstein,et al.  SEXUAL SELECTION IN TOADS: THE ROLES OF FEMALE CHOICE AND MALE BODY SIZE , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  J. Doherty,et al.  Evolutionary and neurobiological implications of selective phonotaxis in the spring peeper (Hyla crucifer) , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[11]  K. Wells,et al.  THE EFFECT OF VEGETATION ON THE PROPAGATION OF CALLS IN THE NEOTROPICAL FROG CENTROLENELLA FLEISCHMANNI , 1982 .

[12]  C. Moss,et al.  Behavioral audiograms of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) and the green tree frog (Hyla cinerea). , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Robert R. Capranica,et al.  Neurobehavioral Correlates of Sound Communication in Anurans , 1983 .

[14]  G. Fellers,et al.  Mate Selection in the Gray Treefrog, Hyla versicolor , 1979 .

[15]  H. Gerhardt Sound Pattern Recognition in Some North American Treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for Mate Choice , 1982 .

[16]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Behavioral Isolating Mechanisms of the Treefrogs Hyla cinerea and H. gratiosa , 1975 .

[17]  Gerhardt Hc Recognition of spectral patterns in the green treefrog: neurobiology and evolution. , 1986 .

[18]  P. Narins,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for a traveling wave in the amphibian inner ear. , 1984, Science.

[19]  Edmund S. Muskie Communication and the Environment , 1970 .

[20]  M. Andersson,et al.  Sexual selection, natural selection and quality advertisement , 1982 .