Adaptive foraging and the rewiring of size-structured food webs following extinctions

Abstract Over the past decade, attempts have been made to characterise the factors affecting the robustness of food webs. Many studies have been carried out using a “topological” approach, in which secondary extinctions in ecological networks are determined by the structure of the network alone. These studies have led to numerous insights; for example how robustness is highly dependent on the order of extinctions, the fraction of basal species, as well as the connectance of the webs. But there has been criticism of these investigations for their lack of biological realism, such as the inability of species to alter their diets when species are lost, or the reliance on the criterion that a species only suffers a secondary extinction once it loses all its resources. Here, building on past approaches, we address these issues by introducing allometric optimal foraging theory to explore the consequences of species adaptively responding (by altering feeding links) to loss of prey in size-structured food webs. We also explore the effect on robustness of a secondary extinction criterion based on a threshold of energy loss, rather than merely the absence of a connection to at least one prey. We show that both rewiring and energetic extinction criteria greatly affect the robustness of model food webs, and that these new factors interact with each other as well as with the body mass distribution of the community, to shape the complexity–robustness relationship.

[1]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[2]  David H. Wright,et al.  Species-energy theory: an extension of species-area theory , 1983 .

[3]  Alison J. Gilbert,et al.  Connectance indicates the robustness of food webs when subjected to species loss , 2009 .

[4]  Michio Kondoh,et al.  Response to Comment on "Foraging Adaptation and the Relationship Between Food-Web Complexity and Stability" , 2003, Science.

[5]  Rodrigo Ramos-Jiliberto,et al.  Consequences of adaptive behaviour for the structure and dynamics of food webs. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[6]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  Network structure and robustness of marine food webs , 2004 .

[7]  Anna Eklöf,et al.  Species loss and secondary extinctions in simple and complex model communities. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[8]  Improving nature conservancy strategies by ecological network theory , 2010 .

[9]  Owen L Petchey,et al.  Size, foraging, and food web structure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Michio Kondoh LINKING FLEXIBLE FOOD WEB STRUCTURE TO POPULATION STABILITY: A THEORETICAL CONSIDERATION ON ADAPTIVE, FOOD WEBS , 2005 .

[11]  Robert E. Ulanowicz,et al.  Aquatic food webs : an ecosystem approach , 2005 .

[12]  H. D. Cooper,et al.  Scenarios for Global Biodiversity in the 21st Century , 2010, Science.

[13]  Peter C de Ruiter and Volkmar Wolters DYNAMIC FOOD WEBS: MULTISPECIES ASSEMBLAGES, ECOSYSTEM DEVELOPMENT, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE , 2005 .

[14]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[15]  M. Pascual,et al.  Ecological networks : Linking structure to dynamics in food webs , 2006 .

[16]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Googling Food Webs: Can an Eigenvector Measure Species' Importance for Coextinctions? , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[17]  Bruce B. Collette,et al.  The Impact of Conservation on the Status of the World’s Vertebrates , 2010, Science.

[18]  J. Emlen The Role of Time and Energy in Food Preference , 1966, The American Naturalist.

[19]  Jennifer A Dunne,et al.  Cascading extinctions and community collapse in model food webs , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Marta Coll,et al.  Structural Degradation in Mediterranean Sea Food Webs: Testing Ecological Hypotheses Using Stochastic and Mass-Balance Modelling , 2008, Ecosystems.

[21]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  The consequences of size dependent foraging for food web topology , 2011 .

[22]  Tomas Jonsson,et al.  Biodiversity lessens the risk of cascading extinction in model food webs , 2000 .

[23]  M. Mckinney Extinction Vulnerability and Selectivity: Combining Ecological and Paleontological Views , 1997 .

[24]  Neo D. Martinez,et al.  Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance , 2002, Ecology Letters.

[25]  Owen T Lewis,et al.  Structural dynamics and robustness of food webs. , 2010, Ecology letters.

[26]  John Harte,et al.  Response of complex food webs to realistic extinction sequences. , 2007, Ecology.

[27]  Owen L. Petchey,et al.  Foraging biology predicts food web complexity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Massimo Marchiori,et al.  Error and attacktolerance of complex network s , 2004 .

[29]  J. Greenwood,et al.  The roles of extinction and colonization in generating species–energy relationships , 2005 .

[30]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Who dominates whom in the ecosystem? Energy flow bottlenecks and cascading extinctions. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Ricard V. Solé,et al.  Complexity and fragility in ecological networks , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[32]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The assembly and disassembly of ecological networks , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  R. Solé,et al.  Ecological networks and their fragility , 2006, Nature.

[34]  Jennifer A. Dunne,et al.  The Network Structure of Food Webs , 2005 .

[35]  Kate E. Jones,et al.  Multiple Causes of High Extinction Risk in Large Mammal Species , 2005, Science.