Hypermedia Reading Materials: Undergraduate Perceptions and Features Affecting Their Reading Comprehension.

Due to the potential of the Internet and blended learning environment, students, especially L2 learners, are often required to read references available online. A study was conducted to identify the perceptions of L2 learners comprising TESL undergraduates towards TESL-related hypermedia reading materials and the factors contributing to their reading comprehension. This case study involved eleven third-year undergraduate TESL students enrolled in a course called ‘Teaching of Reading Skills in an ESL Context’. Data was collected using Think Aloud Protocol, semi-structured interviews, and reflective notes. The findings of this study revealed various participants’ perceptions regarding hypermedia reading materials. Among the factors that improved their reading comprehension include the design of the hypermedia materials and content in terms of the manner in which information was displayed. The participants highlighted the difficulties associated with reading long hypertexts and expressed preference for texts which come in point-form format. Other features cited as being helpful in their reading were the inclusion of pictures, tables, diagrams, audio materials, and videos along with the text. Some other features included hyperlinks and glossaries provided by the websites that the students found beneficial in helping them understand the text. Other less favorable aspects of reading hypermedia materials included advertisements on the websites, easy access to social media websites, and poor Internet connection and bandwidth speed. These were reported to affect the reading process in such a way that they distracted the participants’ concentration, and this ultimately affected reading comprehension to a certain degree. It is hoped that these findings could provide insights for course developers in developing or selecting websites to suit their teaching and learning purposes.

[1]  Ken Beatty,et al.  Teaching and Researching Computer-Assisted Language Learning , 2003 .

[2]  Alexandra Rankin Macgill,et al.  Teens and social media , 2008 .

[3]  Maya B. Eagleton,et al.  Strategies for supporting student Internet inquiry , 2002 .

[4]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[5]  L. Henry,et al.  SEARCHing for an Answer: The Critical Role of New Literacies While Reading on the Internet , 2006 .

[6]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Hypertext and hypermedia , 1990 .

[7]  J. Guthrie,et al.  Contributions of Student Questioning and Prior Knowledge to Construction of Knowledge from Reading Information Text , 2006 .

[8]  Mohamed Ally,et al.  FOUNDATIONS OF EDUCATIONAL THEORY FOR ONL INE LEARNING , 2004 .

[9]  Neil Salkind,et al.  Encyclopedia of educational psychology , 2008 .

[10]  F. Manganello Constructivist Instruction: Success or Failure? , 2010 .

[11]  James Neilsen,et al.  Multimedia and hypertext: The Internet and beyond , 1995 .

[12]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[13]  Zoltán Dörnyei,et al.  Research methods in applied linguistics : quantitative,qualitative, and mixed methodologies , 2007 .

[14]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[15]  Les Howles,et al.  Enhancing L2 Reading Comprehension with Hypermedia Texts: Student Perceptions. , 2014 .

[16]  Julie Coiro,et al.  Exploring the Online Reading Comprehension Strategies Used by Sixth-Grade Skilled Readers to Search for and Locate Information on the Internet. , 2007 .

[17]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Effects of Consumer Knowledge on Message Processing of Electronic Word of Mouth via Online Consumer Reviews , 2008, ECIS.

[18]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Synchronous Learning Experiences: Distance and Residential Learners' Perspectives in a Blended Graduate Course. , 2007 .

[19]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation , 2009 .

[20]  Anna Papst,et al.  Learning Vocabulary In Another Language , 2016 .

[21]  Min-chen Tseng Factors That Influence Online Reading: An Investigation into EFL Students' Perceptions , 2010 .

[22]  P. David Pearson,et al.  Moving From the Old to the New: Research on Reading Comprehension Instruction , 1991 .

[23]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Gilbert John,et al.  Exploring ESL students’ perceptions of their digital reading skills , 2014 .

[25]  M. Anstey,et al.  Teaching and Learning Multiliteracies: Changing Times, Changing Literacies , 2006 .

[26]  Wang Wei,et al.  Electronic literacies: language, culture, and power in online education , 2000 .

[27]  R. G. Duncan,et al.  Beyond the fringe: Building and evaluating scientific knowledge systems , 2009 .

[28]  Nicholas C. Burbules,et al.  Watch It: The Risks And Promises Of Information Technologies For Education , 2000 .

[29]  R. Yin,et al.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed. , 2009 .

[30]  Maik Moeller,et al.  How To Use The Internet In Elt , 2016 .

[31]  M. Anne Britt,et al.  Teaching Advanced Literacy Skills for the World Wide Web , 2001 .

[32]  M. Mohamad,et al.  Adult Learners' Perceptions of Designed Hypermedia in a Blended Learning Course at a Public University in Malaysia. , 2015 .

[33]  Seppo Sirkemaa Implementing Information Technology in the Learning Process , 2007 .

[34]  Michelle Ortlipp Keeping and Using Reflective Journals in the Qualitative Research Process. , 2008 .

[35]  Jean-François Rouet,et al.  The Skills of Document Use: From Text Comprehension to Web-Based Learning , 2006 .

[36]  Saeed Ketabi,et al.  Hypermedia Reading Strategies Used by Persian Graduate Students in TEFL: A Think-Aloud Study , 2012 .

[37]  A. Parry Handbook of Qualitative Research , 2002 .

[38]  P. Liamputtong Qualitative Research Methods , 2005 .

[39]  Taking Guided Learning Theory to School: Reconciling the Cognitive, Motivational, and Social Contexts of Instruction , 2009 .

[40]  J. Ruusuvuori,et al.  Analyzing talk and text , 2011 .