Direction-dependent integration of vision and proprioception in reaching under the influence of the mirror illusion

Recent models of multisensory integration predict differential weighting of information from different sensory modalities in different spatial directions. This direction-dependent weighting account suggests a heavier weighting for vision in the azimuthal (left-right) direction and a heavier weighting for proprioception in the radial (near-far) direction. Visually induced reaching errors, as demonstrated in previous 'mirror illusion' reaching experiments, should therefore be greater under visual-proprioceptive conflict in the azimuthal direction than in the radial direction. We report two experiments designed to investigate the influence of direction-dependent weighting on the visual bias of reaching movements under the influence of a mirror-illusion. In Experiment 1, participants made reaches straight forward, and showed terminal reaching errors that were biased by vision in both directions, but this bias was significantly greater in the azimuthal as compared to the radial direction. In Experiment 2, participants made reaches from right to left, and showed a significant bias only in the azimuthal direction. These results support the direction-dependent weighting of visual and proprioceptive information, with vision relatively more dominant in the azimuthal direction, and proprioception relatively stronger in the radial direction.

[1]  Charles Spence,et al.  When mirrors lie: “Visual capture” of arm position impairs reaching performance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Merging the senses into a robust percept , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  J. Wann,et al.  Does limb proprioception drift? , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  James T. Enns,et al.  Mislocalizations of touch to a fake hand , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Touching a Rubber Hand: Feeling of Body Ownership Is Associated with Activity in Multisensory Brain Areas , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Charles Spence,et al.  Reaching with alien limbs: Visual exposure to prosthetic hands in a mirror biases proprioception without accompanying illusions of ownership , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Torsten Ingemann Nielsen,et al.  VOLITION: A NEW EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH , 1963 .

[10]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Multisensory Integration during Motor Planning , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  R Sullivan,et al.  Experimentally induced somatagnosia. , 1969, Archives of general psychiatry.

[12]  D. Wolpert,et al.  When Feeling Is More Important Than Seeing in Sensorimotor Adaptation , 2002, Current Biology.

[13]  Studies in the influence of abnormal position upon the motor impulse. , 1904 .

[14]  R. Passingham,et al.  That's My Hand! Activity in Premotor Cortex Reflects Feeling of Ownership of a Limb , 2004, Science.

[15]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[16]  R. Welch.  The effect of experienced limb identity upon adaptation to simulated displacement of the visual field , 1972 .

[17]  C. Spence,et al.  Visual Capture of Touch: Out-of-the-Body Experiences With Rubber Gloves , 2000, Psychological science.

[18]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Visual bias of unseen hand position with a mirror: spatial and temporal factors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[19]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Touching the phantom limb , 1995, Nature.

[20]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.