Design and Analysis of a Novel L1 Adaptive Controller, Part I: Control Signal and Asymptotic Stability

In this paper, we develop a novel adaptive control architecture that ensures that the input and output of an uncertain linear system track the input and output of a desired linear system during the transient phase, in addition to the asymptotic tracking. These features are established by first performing an equivalent reparametrization of MRAC, the main difference of which from MRAC is in definition of the error signal for adaptive laws. This new architecture, called companion model adaptive controller (CMAC), allows for incorporation of a low-pass filter into the feedback-loop that enables to enforce the desired transient performance by increasing the adaptation gain. For the proof of asymptotic stability, the Lscr1 gain of a cascaded system, comprised of this filter and the closed-loop desired reference model, is required to be less than the inverse of the upper bound of the norm of unknown parameters used in projection based adaptation laws. Moreover, the new Lscr1 adaptive controller is guaranteed to stay in the low-frequency range. Simulation results illustrate the theoretical findings

[1]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Novel L1 Adaptive Controller, Part II: Guaranteed Transient Performance , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[2]  Robert R. Bitmead,et al.  Transient bounds for adaptive control systems , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Yu Tang,et al.  Adaptive control of robots with an improved transient performance , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[4]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Performance analysis and improvement in model reference adaptive control , 1994, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[5]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  A new linear adaptive controller: design, analysis and performance , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[6]  Naira Hovakimyan,et al.  Guaranteed Transient Performance with $\mathcal{L}_1$ Adaptive Controller for Systems with Unknown Time-varying Parameters: Part I , 2006 .

[7]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  On modifying model reference adaptive control schemes for performance improvement , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Miroslav Krstic,et al.  Transient-performance improvement with a new class of adaptive controllers , 1993 .

[9]  Kumpati S. Narendra,et al.  Improving transient response of adaptive control systems using multiple models and switching , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[10]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  Robust Adaptive Control , 1984, 1984 American Control Conference.

[11]  Weiping Li,et al.  Applied Nonlinear Control , 1991 .

[12]  J. Doyle,et al.  Essentials of Robust Control , 1997 .

[13]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Guaranteed Transient Performance with L1 Adaptive Controller for Systems with Unknown Time-varying Parameters and Bounded Disturbances: Part I , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[14]  Antonella Ferrara,et al.  Robustness and performance of an indirect adaptive control scheme in presence of bounded disturbances , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[15]  Chengyu Cao,et al.  Stability Margins of L1 Adaptive Controller: Part II , 2007, 2007 American Control Conference.

[16]  R. Ortega On Morse's new adaptive controller: parameter convergence and transient performance , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Daniel E. Miller,et al.  An adaptive controller which provides an arbitrarily good transient and steady-state response , 1991 .

[18]  B. Ydstie Transient performance and robustness of direct adaptive control , 1992 .

[19]  Ramon R. Costa Improving transient behavior of model-reference adaptive control , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[20]  Anuradha M. Annaswamy,et al.  Stable Adaptive Systems , 1989 .