Correction to: Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines
暂无分享,去创建一个
Mary Hegarty | Sarah H. Creem-Regehr | Lace M. K. Padilla | Sarah H Creem-Regehr | Jeanine K. Stefanucci | Jeanine K Stefanucci | Lace M Padilla | M. Hegarty | S. Creem-Regehr
[1] Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al. How Do Decision Time and Realism Affect Map-Based Decision Making? , 2011, COSIT.
[2] S. Joslyn,et al. Decisions With Uncertainty: The Glass Half Full , 2013 .
[3] Susan Joslyn,et al. Probabilistic Interval Forecasts: An Individual Differences Approach to Understanding Forecast Communication , 2017 .
[4] Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al. Cognitively Plausible Information Visualization , 2005 .
[5] R. Engle,et al. Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex. , 1999 .
[6] Jonathan Evans,et al. Science Perspectives on Psychological , 2022 .
[7] Jacques Bertin,et al. Semiology of Graphics - Diagrams, Networks, Maps , 2010 .
[8] C. Melody Carswell,et al. Geospatial Perspective-Taking: How Well Do Decision Makers Choose Their Views? , 2007 .
[9] J Meyer,et al. Performance with tables and graphs: effects of training and a Visual Search Model , 2000, Ergonomics.
[10] Magnus Boman,et al. Implementing an agent trade server , 2003, Decis. Support Syst..
[11] Ruth Rosenholtz,et al. A computational form of the statistical saliency model for visual search , 2005 .
[12] John M. Findlay,et al. How People Extract Information from Graphs: Evidence from a Sentence-Graph Verification Paradigm , 2000, Diagrams.
[13] Edward T. Cokely,et al. Individual Differences in Graph Literacy: Overcoming Denominator Neglect in Risk Comprehension , 2012 .
[14] B. Balleine. The Neural Basis of Choice and Decision Making , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[15] M. Galesic,et al. Graph Literacy , 2011, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[16] R. Engle,et al. Working memory capacity and the scope and control of attention , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.
[17] Steven Pinker,et al. A theory of graph comprehension. , 1990 .
[18] Alisa Bandlow,et al. Evaluating Information Visualizations with Working Memory Metrics , 2011, HCI.
[19] Mary Hegarty,et al. Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animations , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[20] Harvey S. Smallman,et al. The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks , 2001, Hum. Factors.
[21] J. Gore,et al. Relevance of graph literacy in the development of patient-centered communication tools. , 2016, Patient education and counseling.
[22] Maria Riveiro,et al. Visually supported reasoning under uncertain conditions: Effects of domain expertise on air traffic risk assessment , 2016, Spatial Cogn. Comput..
[23] Mary Hegarty,et al. Assessing the effectiveness of different visualizations for judgments of positional uncertainty , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[24] D. Kahneman. Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .
[25] Paul R. Havig,et al. A human cognition framework for information visualization , 2014, Comput. Graph..
[26] G. Keren,et al. Two Is Not Always Better Than One , 2009, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[27] Mary Hegarty,et al. Cognitively Inspired and Perceptually Salient Graphic Displays for Efficient Spatial Inference Making , 2010 .
[28] P. Ubel,et al. Reducing the Influence of Anecdotal Reasoning on People’s Health Care Decisions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Statistics? , 2005, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.
[29] Yasmina Okan,et al. How People with Low and High Graph Literacy Process Health Graphs: Evidence from Eye‐tracking , 2016 .
[30] A. Miyake,et al. The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: an individual differences approach. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[31] Erika A. Waters,et al. Reducing aversion to side effects in preventive medical treatment decisions. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[32] Donald H. House,et al. Uncertainty Visualization by Representative Sampling from Prediction Ensembles , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[33] J. Wiley,et al. An examination of the seductive details effect in terms of working memory capacity , 2006, Memory & cognition.
[34] Limor Nadav-Greenberg,et al. The Effect of Uncertainty Visualizations on Decision Making in Weather Forecasting , 2008 .
[35] Eric R. Stone,et al. Effects of numerical and graphical displays on professed risk-taking behavior. , 1997 .
[36] David K. Simkin,et al. An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .
[37] R. García-Retamero,et al. Health Literacy, Numeracy, and Graphical Literacy Among Veterans in Primary Care and Their Effect on Shared Decision Making and Trust in Physicians , 2013, Journal of health communication.
[38] Mary Hegarty,et al. The Cognitive Science of Visual-Spatial Displays: Implications for Design , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[39] D. Kahneman,et al. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. , 2002 .
[40] Matt Duckham,et al. Evaluating the impact of visualization of wildfire hazard upon decision-making under uncertainty , 2016, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..
[41] Alan M. MacEachren,et al. Evaluating the effect of visually represented geodata uncertainty on decision-making: systematic review, lessons learned, and recommendations , 2017 .
[42] H. Smallman,et al. Choosing and using geospatial displays: effects of design on performance and metacognition. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[43] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[44] Jon Oberlander,et al. A cognitive theory of graphical and linguistic reasoning: logic and implementation. Cognitive Science , 1995 .
[45] H. Pashler. Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.
[46] R. Bednarz,et al. Effect of GIS Learning on Spatial Thinking , 2009 .
[47] Radhika Santhanam,et al. Emergency management information systems: Could decision makers be supported in choosing display formats? , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..
[48] H. Wainer,et al. Alternative Displays for Communicating NAEP Results: A Redesign and Validity Study , 1999 .
[49] Gerald L. Lohse,et al. A Cognitive Model for Understanding Graphical Perception , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..
[50] Jonathan Evans. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.
[51] S. Epstein,et al. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[52] Alan D. Castel,et al. Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning , 2008, Cognition.
[53] G Gigerenzer,et al. Using natural frequencies to improve diagnostic inferences , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.
[54] Winston R. Sieck,et al. Foreground:background salience: Explaining the effects of graphical displays on risk avoidance , 2003 .
[55] Bin Zhu,et al. Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..
[56] John C. Trueswell,et al. Perceiving and remembering events cross-linguistically: Evidence from dual-task paradigms , 2010 .
[57] Alan R. Dennis,et al. Using Geographical Information Systems for Decision Making: Extending Cognitive Fit Theory to Map-Based Presentations , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..
[58] G. Cumming,et al. Researchers misunderstand confidence intervals and standard error bars. , 2005, Psychological methods.
[59] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. Effects of ensemble and summary displays on interpretations of geospatial uncertainty data , 2017, Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications.
[60] Alan M. MacEachren,et al. How to Assess Visual Communication of Uncertainty? A Systematic Review of Geospatial Uncertainty Visualisation User Studies , 2014 .
[61] Mary Hegarty,et al. Where are you? The Effect of Uncertainty and its Visual Representation on Location Judgments in GPS-like Displays , 2016, CogSci.
[62] James A Schirillo,et al. The Greater Ability of Graphical Versus Numerical Displays to Increase Risk Avoidance Involves a Common Mechanism , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[63] Donald H. House,et al. Non-expert interpretations of hurricane forecast uncertainty visualizations , 2016, CogSci.
[64] Cynthia Frownfelter-Lohrke,et al. The effects of differing information presentations of general purpose financial statements on users' decisions , 1998 .
[65] Jessica S. Ancker,et al. The Practice of Informatics: Design Features of Graphs in Health Risk Communication: A Systematic Review , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..
[66] S. Sloman. Two systems of reasoning. , 2002 .
[67] M. H. Fischer,et al. Different clues from different views: The role of image format in public perceptions of neuroimaging results , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[68] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. Evaluating the Impact of Binning 2D Scalar Fields , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.
[69] Ben Shneiderman,et al. Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .
[70] Gerald L. Lohse,et al. The role of working memory on graphical information processing , 1997, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[71] Luciana Picucci,et al. WORKING MEMORY COMPONENTS AND VIRTUAL REORIENTATION: A DUAL TASK STUDY , 2011 .
[72] S. Yantis,et al. Visual Attention: Bottom-Up Versus Top-Down , 2004, Current Biology.
[73] Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al. The influence of different graphical displays on nonexpert decision making under uncertainty. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[74] Mirta Galesic,et al. When Higher Bars Are Not Larger Quantities: On Individual Differences in the Use of Spatial Information in Graph Comprehension , 2012, Spatial Cogn. Comput..
[75] Brian J Scholl,et al. Bar graphs depicting averages are perceptually misinterpreted: The within-the-bar bias , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[76] P. Todd,et al. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart , 1999 .
[77] Christof Koch,et al. A Model of Saliency-Based Visual Attention for Rapid Scene Analysis , 2009 .
[78] Andrew R. A. Conway,et al. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[79] Erika A. Waters,et al. Formats for Improving Risk Communication in Medical Tradeoff Decisions , 2006, Journal of health communication.
[80] Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al. Working Memory in Wayfinding - A Dual Task Experiment in a Virtual City , 2008, Cogn. Sci..
[81] A. Tversky,et al. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.
[82] J G Hollands,et al. Judgments of Change and Proportion in Graphical Perception , 1992, Human factors.
[83] Mary Hegarty,et al. Explicit Versus Actionable Knowledge: The Influence of Explaining Graphical Conventions on Interpretation of Hurricane Forecast Visualizations , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.
[84] V. Reyna,et al. How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. , 2009, Psychological bulletin.
[85] Mary Hegarty,et al. Thinking about the weather: How display salience and knowledge affect performance in a graphic inference task. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[86] Jeffrey V. Nickerson,et al. Representing Category and Continuum: Visualizing Thought , 2012, Diagrams.
[87] Dennis F. Galletta,et al. Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..
[88] Arzu Çöltekin,et al. An empirical evaluation of three elevation change symbolization methods along routes in bicycle maps , 2017 .
[89] Barbara Tversky,et al. Visualizing Thought , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[90] K. Holyoak,et al. Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[91] Priti Shah,et al. Bar and Line Graph Comprehension: An Interaction of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[92] G. Gigerenzer,et al. Using icon arrays to communicate medical risks: overcoming low numeracy. , 2009, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[93] Tamara Munzner,et al. Visualization Analysis and Design , 2014, A.K. Peters visualization series.
[94] Nelson Cowan,et al. The many faces of working memory and short-term storage , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[95] W. Singer,et al. Dynamic predictions: Oscillations and synchrony in top–down processing , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.
[96] Karl J. Friston,et al. Where bottom-up meets top-down: neuronal interactions during perception and imagery. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.
[97] Andrew Heathcote,et al. Cognitive workload measurement and modeling under divided attention. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[98] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Heuristic decision making in medicine , 2012, Dialogues in clinical neuroscience.
[99] Erran Carmel,et al. The Effectiveness of Different Representations for Managerial Problem Solving: Comparing Tables and Maps , 1997 .
[100] Priti Shah,et al. The Comprehension of Quantitative Information in Graphical Displays. , 2005 .
[101] Peter B. M. Vranas,et al. Gigerenzer's normative critique of Kahneman and Tversky , 2000, Cognition.
[102] Michael Siegrist,et al. Effect of Risk Ladder Format on Risk Perception in High‐ and Low‐Numerate Individuals , 2009, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[103] Amy Lobben,et al. Tasks, Strategies, and Cognitive Processes Associated With Navigational Map Reading: A Review Perspective* , 2004, The Professional Geographer.