Multidetector CT of the liver and hepatic neoplasms: effect of multiphasic imaging on tumor conspicuity and vascular enhancement.

OBJECTIVE Our aim was to determine which of three contrast-enhanced phases (early arterial, late arterial, or portal venous) was optimal for achieving maximal enhancement of the celiac artery, portal vein, and hepatic parenchyma. We also wanted to learn which phase provided the maximal tumor-to-parenchyma difference when using multidetector CT (MDCT) with fixed timing delays. MATERIALS AND METHODS Fifty-two patients with suspected or known hepatic tumors underwent multiphasic contrast-enhanced MDCT using double arterial (early and late arterial) and venous phase acquisitions with fixed timing delays. All patients were administered 150 mL of IV contrast material at an injection rate of 4 mL/sec. Images were acquired at 20 sec for the early arterial phase, 35 sec for the late arterial phase, and 60 sec for the portal venous phase. Attenuation measurements of the celiac artery, portal vein, normal hepatic parenchyma, and the hepatic tumor were compared. Three reviewers independently and subjectively rated tumor conspicuity for each of the three phases. Ratings were compared using kappa statistics. RESULTS Late arterial phase images showed maximal celiac axis attenuation, whereas portal venous phase images revealed the highest portal vein and normal hepatic parenchymal attenuation. Maximal tumor-to-parenchyma differences for hypovascular tumors was superior in the portal venous phase, but we found no significant differences in maximal tumor-to-parenchyma differences for hypervascular tumors among the evaluated phases. On subjective analysis, interobserver agreement was moderate to very good for the three phases. All three reviewers graded both hypovascular and hypervascular tumor conspicuity as superior in either the late arterial phase or the portal venous phase in most patients. In only one patient was the early arterial phase graded as superior to the late arterial and portal venous phases (by two of the three reviewers). CONCLUSION When MDCT of the liver is performed using fixed timing delays, maximal vascular and hepatic parenchymal enhancement is achieved on either late arterial phase or portal venous phase imaging. In most patients, early arterial phase imaging does not improve tumor conspicuity by either quantitative or subjective analysis.

[1]  M. Macari,et al.  Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms at multi-detector row CT angiography: intravascular enhancement without a timing acquisition. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  T. Murakami,et al.  Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: detection with double arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. , 2001, Radiology.

[3]  J. Sandstede,et al.  Optimization of automatic bolus tracking for timing of the arterial phase of helical liver CT , 2001, European Radiology.

[4]  W. Foley,et al.  Multiphase hepatic CT with a multirow detector CT scanner. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  W D Foley,et al.  Four multidetector-row helical CT: image quality and volume coverage speed. , 2000, Radiology.

[6]  M. C. Han,et al.  Nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: variation of tumor conspicuity on single-level dynamic scan and optimization of fixed delay times for two-phase helical CT. , 2000, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  T. Murakami,et al.  Optimal phases of dynamic CT for detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of unenhanced and triple-phase images , 1999, Abdominal Imaging.

[8]  D. DeLong,et al.  Comparison of unenhanced, hepatic arterial-dominant, and portal venous-dominant phase helical CT for the detection of liver metastases in women with breast carcinoma. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[9]  J. Ellis,et al.  Aortic enhancement during abdominal CT angiography: correlation with test injections, flow rates, and patient demographics. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  M. Tublin,et al.  Effect of injection rate of contrast medium on pancreatic and hepatic helical CT. , 1999, Radiology.

[11]  T. Vogl,et al.  Biphasic spiral computed tomography for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma before resection or orthotopic liver transplantation. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[12]  D. DeLong,et al.  Carcinoid metastases to the liver: role of triple-phase helical CT. , 1998, Radiology.

[13]  M. Federle,et al.  Hypervascular liver metastases: do unenhanced and hepatic arterial phase CT images affect tumor detection? , 1997, Radiology.

[14]  M. Kanematsu,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: the role of helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT versus CT during arterial portography. , 1997, Radiology.

[15]  R. Jeffrey,et al.  Do arterial phase helical CT images improve detection or characterization of colorectal liver metastases? , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  R. Nelson,et al.  Helical CT for detecting focal liver lesions in patients with breast carcinoma: comparison of noncontrast phase, hepatic arterial phase, and portal venous phase. , 1997, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[17]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  Nodular hepatocellular carcinomas: detection with arterial-, portal-, and delayed-phase images at spiral CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[18]  M S van Leeuwen,et al.  Focal liver lesions: characterization with triphasic spiral CT. , 1996, Radiology.

[19]  R. Baron,et al.  Helical biphasic contrast-enhanced CT of the liver: technique, indications, interpretation, and pitfalls. , 1996, Radiology.

[20]  M Takahashi,et al.  Multiple-phase helical CT of the liver for detecting small hepatomas in patients with liver cirrhosis: contrast-injection protocol and optimal timing. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  R. Littell SAS System for Mixed Models , 1996 .

[22]  H E Rockette,et al.  Detecting hepatocellular carcinoma: value of unenhanced or arterial phase CT imaging or both used in conjunction with conventional portal venous phase contrast-enhanced CT imaging. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[23]  B L Holbert,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. , 1996, Radiology.

[24]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Helical CT of the liver: value of an early hepatic arterial phase. , 1995, Radiology.

[25]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Categorical Data Analysis Using The SAS1 System , 1995 .

[26]  J. Heiken,et al.  Dynamic incremental CT: effect of volume and concentration of contrast material and patient weight on hepatic enhancement. , 1995, Radiology.

[27]  R B Jeffrey,et al.  Dual-phase helical CT of the liver: value of arterial phase scans in the detection of small (< or = 1.5 cm) malignant hepatic neoplasms. , 1995, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .