Cross-layer protocols for energy-efficient wireless sensor networking

The Army's next generation distributed sensor networks provide stand-off situational awareness for future troops. A major factor for the performance and lifecycle of these sensor networks is their ability to conserve battery power. As advances in RF components reach the physical limits of energy efficiency, new network protocols operating at the link layer and above hold the greatest opportunities for additional improvements in energy efficiency. Recently, a number of power-saving solutions have been proposed that separately consider power-consumption of media access control (MAC) scheduling and routing algorithms, but have not considered the potential benefit of cross-layer optimization across these algorithms. In this paper, we present an approach that integrates pseudo-dynamic scheduling at the link-layer with diversity routing at the network-layer. The link-layer protocol also provides detailed control of the physical-layer's radio state. Our work focuses on reducing the energy loss due to idle listening, control signaling, congestion hot-spots, and packet collisions. We present analytical and simulation results that demonstrate the increased energy efficiency of this class of cross-layer protocols examine the throughput and latency impacts and define how parameters should be set to optimize the end-to-end performance. We anticipate that the technology presented here will have broad application to army sensor networks as well as public commercial wireless systems and plant automation

[1]  Timothy D. Andersen,et al.  A simple and effective cross layer networking system for mobile ad hoc networks , 2002, The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[2]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation Fine-grained Network Time Synchronization Using Reference Broadcasts , 2022 .

[3]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) Routing , 2001, RFC.

[4]  Dimitri P. Bertsekas,et al.  Dynamic behavior of shortest path routing algorithms for communication networks , 1982 .

[5]  Timothy J. Shepard,et al.  A channel access scheme for large dense packet radio networks , 1996, SIGCOMM '96.

[6]  Tamer A. ElBatt,et al.  Joint scheduling and power control for wireless ad hoc networks , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[7]  Mihail L. Sichitiu,et al.  Cross-layer scheduling for power efficiency in wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[8]  Pierre L'Ecuyer,et al.  Tables of linear congruential generators of different sizes and good lattice structure , 1999, Math. Comput..

[9]  Andy Hopper,et al.  Piconet: embedded mobile networking , 1997, IEEE Wirel. Commun..

[10]  Mung Chiang,et al.  To layer or not to layer: balancing transport and physical layers in wireless multihop networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[11]  Karl Entacher,et al.  Bad subsequences of well-known linear congruential pseudorandom number generators , 1998, TOMC.

[12]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks , 2002, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies.

[13]  David E. Culler,et al.  A transmission control scheme for media access in sensor networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[14]  R. R. Coveyou,et al.  Fourier Analysis of Uniform Random Number Generators , 1967, JACM.

[15]  Suresh Singh,et al.  PAMAS—power aware multi-access protocol with signalling for ad hoc networks , 1998, CCRV.

[16]  Gray Girling,et al.  The PEN low power protocol stack , 2000, Proceedings Ninth International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (Cat.No.00EX440).

[17]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Medium access control with coordinated adaptive sleeping for wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.