Usefulness of MEG magnetometer for spike detection in patients with mesial temporal epileptic focus

The present study investigated the sensitivity of magnetoencephalography (MEG) for spikes depending on sensor type in patients with mesial temporal epileptic focus. We recorded MEG in 6 patients with mesial temporal epileptic focus using two sensor types (magnetometer and gradiometer) simultaneously. The number of spikes detected and the corresponding equivalent current dipole (ECD) parameters (distance from the coordinated head center (radius), and dipole moment) were evaluated with respect to sensor type. Among 426 MEG 'consensus spikes' determined by 3 reviewers, 378 spikes satisfied the predetermined criteria for source localization. Comparing ECD parameters, spikes detected by magnetometer alone displayed a smaller radius and larger dipole moment than those detected by gradiometer alone. Spikes estimated in the mesial temporal area were more frequently detected by magnetometer alone (38.5%) than by gradiometer alone (11.5%), whereas spikes in the lateral temporal area were detected less by magnetometer alone (3.7%) than by gradiometer alone (53.9%). The present results suggest that a magnetometer is advantageous for spike detection in patients with mesial temporal epileptic focus. This also implies the higher sensitivity of magnetometer for deep sources.

[1]  J S Ebersole,et al.  Non-invasive pre-surgical evaluation with EEG/MEG source analysis. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[2]  Maeike Zijlmans,et al.  Modality-specific Spike Identification in Simultaneous Magnetoencephalography/Electroencephalography: A Methodological Approach , 2002, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[3]  大石 誠 Epileptic spikes : Magnetoencephalography versus simultaneous electrocorticography , 2003 .

[4]  坂本 真一 Interictal patterns of cerebral glucose metabolism, perfusion, and magnetic field in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy , 2004 .

[5]  Y Mayanagi,et al.  Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Clinical Features and Seizure Mechanism , 1996, Epilepsia.

[6]  Joshua R. Smith,et al.  A Comparison of Magnetoencephalography, MRI, and V‐EEG in Patients Evaluated for Epilepsy Surgery , 1999, Epilepsia.

[7]  G Lindinger,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in Focal Epilepsy , 2000, Epilepsia.

[8]  Christoph Baumgartner,et al.  Combined MEG/EEG analysis of the interictal spike complex in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy , 2005, NeuroImage.

[9]  Timothy A. Pedley,et al.  Epilepsy : a comprehensive textbook , 2008 .

[10]  Martina Bebin,et al.  Electroclinical and magnetoencephalographic studies in epilepsy patients with polymicrogyria , 2004, Epilepsy Research.

[11]  M. Scherg,et al.  EEG and MEG Source Analysis of Single and Averaged Interictal Spikes Reveals Intrinsic Epileptogenicity in Focal Cortical Dysplasia , 2004, Epilepsia.

[12]  M. Scherg,et al.  MEG Versus EEG: Influence of Background Activity on Interictal Spike Detection , 2006, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[13]  J. Ebersole,et al.  Intracranial EEG Substrates of Scalp EEG Interictal Spikes , 2005, Epilepsia.

[14]  P. G. Larsson,et al.  The value of multichannel MEG and EEG in the presurgical evaluation of 70 epilepsy patients , 2006, Epilepsy Research.

[15]  R. Ilmoniemi,et al.  Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain , 1993 .

[16]  Kristen Riley,et al.  Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram in epilepsy surgery: A prospective study , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[17]  K Abraham-Fuchs,et al.  Magnetic source localization and morphological changes in temporal lobe epilepsy: comparison of MEG/EEG, ECoG and volumetric MRI in presurgical evaluation of operated patients , 1994, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[18]  J S Ebersole,et al.  Magnetoencephalography/Magnetic Source Imaging in the Assessment of Patients with Epilepsy , 1997, Epilepsia.

[19]  Masaki Iwasaki,et al.  Does magnetoencephalography add to scalp video-EEG as a diagnostic tool in epilepsy surgery? , 2004, Neurology.

[20]  F. E. Posthumus Meyjes,et al.  Recommendations for the practice of clinical neurophysiology Made by the international federation of societies for electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, xiii + 191 pages, illustrated, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1983, US$ 9.95, Dfl 35.00 , 1984, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[21]  Arent de Jongh,et al.  Differences in MEG/EEG Epileptic Spike Yields Explained by Regional Differences in Signal-to-Noise Ratios , 2005, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[22]  Richard Wennberg Magnetic source imaging versus intracranial electroencephalogram: Neocortical versus temporolimbic epilepsy surgery , 2006, Annals of neurology.

[23]  P Berg,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic spikes not detected by conventional electroencephalography , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Gabriela Scheler,et al.  Utilization of magnetoencephalography results to obtain favourable outcomes in epilepsy surgery. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  L. T. Ho,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic yield of interictal spikes in temporal lobe epilepsy Comparison with scalp EEG recordings , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  Christoph Baumgartner,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in presurgical epilepsy evaluation , 2002, Neurosurgical Review.

[27]  G. Barkley,et al.  MEG and EEG in Epilepsy , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[28]  E. Halgren,et al.  Application of Magnetoencephalography in Epilepsy Patients with Widespread Spike or Slow‐wave Activity , 2005, Epilepsia.

[29]  Jerome Engel,et al.  Surgical treatment of the epilepsies , 1993 .

[30]  José Maria Fernandes,et al.  What Does an Epileptiform Spike Look Like in MEG? Comparison Between Coincident EEG and MEG Spikes , 2005, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[31]  H. Lüders,et al.  Detection of Epileptiform Activity by Human Interpreters: Blinded Comparison between Electroencephalography and Magnetoencephalography , 2005, Epilepsia.

[32]  Shirin Sarkari,et al.  Toward the Substitution of Invasive Electroencephalography in Epilepsy Surgery , 2005, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[33]  Hiroshi Shibasaki,et al.  Simultaneous Recording of Epileptiform Discharges by MEG and Subdural Electrodes in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy , 1997, NeuroImage.

[34]  G Lindinger,et al.  Neuromagnetic recordings in temporal lobe epilepsy. , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[35]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[36]  Kenneth D Laxer,et al.  Magnetoencephalography source localization and surgical outcome in temporal lobe epilepsy , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[37]  Tomás Ortiz,et al.  MEG in the presurgical investigation of temporal lobe epilepsy. , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[38]  R. Fagaly,et al.  Neuromagnetic instrumentation. , 1990, Advances in neurology.

[39]  Oswaldo Baffa,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in epilepsy. , 2003, Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria.

[40]  Jerome Engel,et al.  Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. , 1993 .

[41]  R Salmelin,et al.  The 3D topography of MEG source localization accuracy: effects of conductor model and noise , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[42]  Takashi Yoshimoto,et al.  Comparison of magnetoencephalographic spikes with and without concurrent electroencephalographic spikes in extratemporal epilepsy. , 2004, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine.

[43]  G. Barkley,et al.  Controversies in neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Pro , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  T. Otsuki,et al.  Neuroimaging and presurgical evaluation of symptomatic epilepsies , 2004, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[45]  Frans S S Leijten,et al.  High-resolution Source Imaging in Mesiotemporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Comparison Between MEG and Simultaneous EEG , 2003, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[46]  C. Baumgartner Controversies in clinical neurophysiology. MEG is superior to EEG in the localization of interictal epileptiform activity: Con , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.